microLED is better than OLED. miniLED is not better than OLED.I thought mini led was supposed to be superior to oled
microLED is better than OLED. miniLED is not better than OLED.I thought mini led was supposed to be superior to oled
Considering all iPhone 12 models have an OLED screen with the exception of the budget SE 2020, I am guessing that the iPad Pro will get the OLED treatment in 2021/22 and iPad Air and Mini will receive the mini-led treatment while the budget stays at led.So which is cheaper? OLED or miniLED? Burning issues of OLED? These screen are on 12h a day at least. Any issue with the menu bar being permanently "on" after awhile.
Apple Marketing will call it "MagicOLED" or something, never underestimate AppleMagic.Text looks like crap on pentile displays so I hope they get that worked out.
My iPad just gets used as a HUGE media Player for Audio and Video
When they start making 15 to 17 inch models with True Split screen , more RAM , An IOS file system so you can actually save files, more ports.......
THEN My iPad will be a REAL COMPUTER
Digitimes and Forbes are both useless, one should never take anything they say seriously.Of course..digitimes is always wrong when they come up with their own predictions and not copy paste from others
Apple develops a ton of tech. Including microprocessors, customized LCDs, custom display driver circuitry, GPUs, apple pencil, etc. etc. Just because they don’t manufacture those things doesn’t mean they didn’t develop them.
Wrong. Apple can make a few worthless customizations to a manufacturer's reference design to call it customized, but the underlying technology belongs to the manufacturer to improve yield rates, reduce ramp-up risk and lower costs.
As the great Elon Musk said, manufacturing is the most difficult and important part of tech development. Designing is one the easiest steps. It's the magic of manufacturing that determines the limits of your design. Designers only need to carefully play around the limits of the manufacturing process, but their overall impact to performance and quality is very minimal.
IE. Look at AMD vs Intel processors. When AMD had the process advantage, their CPUs started outperforming Intel's.
Mini-LED... OLED ... somebody is wrong.
Oh damn how expensive it will be.. 😱
The M1 is on a 5nm process while AMD's latest are on 7nm. You haven't disproven anything; in fact, you only made my argument stronger.I worked at AMD designing processors. The statement above is so lacking in factual basis it’s unclear where even to begin to address it. But simply comparing AMD to M1 now, and seeing how apple trounces AMD in performance per watt, disproves your entire hypothesis.
Yeah, that's what I read also.. Same upside of OLED without the burn out issues (TV no issues) but would be on a computer screen.. I doubt OLED will ever come to normal displays we use for computers on scale, unless they iron out the burn out problems..I thought mini led was supposed to be superior to oled
MiniLED is still LCD just more advanced backlighting and doesn't come near OLEDYeah, that's what I read also.. Same upside of OLED without the burn out issues (TV no issues) but would be on a computer screen.. I doubt OLED will ever come to normal displays we use for computers on scale, unless they iron out the burn out problems..
That's the micro-LED technology you're talking about.I thought mini led was supposed to be superior to oled
It depends on what you mean by developing tech, but they certainly do develop tech by every definition of develop that i am aware of.Apple doesn't develop tech. They do testing to see which suppliers have the best tech, but they don't develop them. It's like building a PC.
It’s better to admit you are wrong and have no idea what you are talking about rather than doubling down on intellectual dishonesty.The M1 is on a 5nm process while AMD's latest are on 7nm. You haven't disproven anything; in fact, you only made my argument stronger.
The M1's magic comes from TSMC's 5nm process. Anyone can design something similar to the M1. It's not hard. Fab-less "Designing" is more about cost-benefit analysis than actual technological progress. It most certainly is not as hard as designing the actual fabbing process (There is only 1 company in the world that can do it), nor is it that important. Anyone can do it.
It's the magic of manufacturing that determines the limits of your design. Designers only need to carefully play around the limits of the manufacturing process, but their overall impact to performance and quality is very minimal.
Troll...108 comments of anti Apple nonsense... get a life dude!Wrong. Apple can make a few worthless customizations to a manufacturer's reference design to call it customized, but the underlying technology belongs to the manufacturer to improve yield rates, reduce ramp-up risk and lower costs.
As the great Elon Musk said, manufacturing is the most difficult and important part of tech development. Designing is one the easiest steps. It's the magic of manufacturing that determines the limits of your design. Designers only need to carefully play around the limits of the manufacturing process, but their overall impact to performance and quality is very minimal.
IE. Look at AMD vs Intel processors. When AMD had the process advantage, their CPUs started outperforming Intel's.
You need both the design and the fab competence to succeed and they are equally important. Do you think it is easy to fab chips with 5 nm features? I bet the processes protocols are under strict NDA and that knowledge is the edge that TMSC has at the moment. Otherwise, all others would just copy and paste. Not far ago, Samsung was the leader in fab. The reason Intel is behind on the node scale is not lack of funding for buying machines for photopatterning at 5 nm scale but they lack people with the knowledge to operate said machines to get good chips out.It’s better to admit you are wrong and have no idea what you are talking about rather than doubling down on intellectual dishonesty.
Not sure what OLED he's using but text on my iPhone X looks pretty sharp.Apple Marketing will call it "MagicOLED" or something, never underestimate AppleMagic.
The M1 is on a 5nm process while AMD's latest are on 7nm. You haven't disproven anything; in fact, you only made my argument stronger.
The M1's magic comes from TSMC's 5nm process. Anyone can design something similar to the M1. It's not hard. Fab-less "Designing" is more about cost-benefit analysis than actual technological progress. It most certainly is not as hard as designing the actual fabbing process (There is only 1 company in the world that can do it), nor is it that important. Anyone can do it.
Nobody said one trumps another, only @AppleShareholder, but we went this road before. Before it's Samsung fab that made A processors beats everyone, including Samsung's own. Now in 2021 it's because of TSMC. Looks like Apple never get credit it deserves.You need both the design and the fab competence to succeed and they are equally important. Do you think it is easy to fab chips with 5 nm features? I bet the processes protocols are under strict NDA and that knowledge is the edge that TMSC has at the moment. Otherwise, all others would just copy and paste. Not far ago, Samsung was the leader in fab. The reason Intel is behind on the node scale is not lack of funding for buying machines for photopatterning at 5 nm scale but they lack people with the knowledge to operate said machines to get good chips out.