She is not only the best girlfriend a man could ask for, but she is also an avid Mac user and was well aware of the coming update.
Here is where she sits on it. She is the one who originally convinced me to get the ACD 30", and she watched me go through the process of tethering my MBP to it (I gave her my iMac 24" when I got the display) with its fans howling. Then she saw me get the Mini as a stop-gap and saw the change in resolution (and loss of power) and went through the steps in the wait for Penryn 8-cores (for the price of 4) through the November phantom event.
She knows that the Penryns will probably come in January, and will offer slightly faster 8-cores for the price of the 2.66 4-core, and come with 2GB of RAM and a 500GB drive (which all means less upgrading).
She bought it knowing that we might want to exchange, but just wanted me to have what I wanted.
Now, I am not impressed by a bump to 2.83, and I can drop in drives and RAM. What we are wondering is not if the machine will physically last longer, but whether 8-cores will become more important in a few years and that hence an 8-core machine will have a longer functional lifespan.
I don't think I need a better graphics card. If I do one day, I can always upgrade. I think 16GB of RAM should be enough for a long time, never mind 32GB. But if multi-core support is going to become more prevalent, programmers have a way of requiring users to eat up ever increasing resources, and I do want this machine to last.
On the other hand, I also want to load this baby up and hook it up today!
If anybody has any insight into whether 8-cores would extend the functional like of the machine as a fire-breathing beast, I'd appreciate it. Conversely, I am dying to unleash this beast from its box and start enjoying this great machine.
For those who think me not grateful, trust me, that has nothing to do with it. We are just on the doorstep of Apple doubling the cores for the same price, and that is giving me pause.