It’s pretty clear, you can’t read.
“Of course it does, don’t be so stupid. Unless it’s owned by the British government/general public, then it’s privatized.”
edit: all my edits are marked as such, again posting troll crap.
You wrote that in reply to my saying that adverts are not exclusively shown on privatised tv stations.
I said, as an example, that Channel Four is a publicly owned tv channel with adverts, so therefore it’s clear it doesn’t matter who the owner is in relation to whether it runs adverts or not. Public or private, either can and do run adverts.
You called me stupid and ever since have been trying to suggest the same saying I ‘can’t read’ and ‘it’s not about channel four so therefore I’m trolling’ etc.
The problem, though, is that I was debunking your assumption that just becuase it’s publicly owned doesn’t mean it can’t have adverts. I used channel four as and example of a public British tv channel showing adverts. It fits nicely in a conversation about any British telly as at the moment the is a massive discussion in the UK about the government trying to privatised the channel. This is to what the op you originally responded to was referring
Here look- it’s very clear, even with your edits.
Me: “[when showing adverts]…makes no difference who owns them”
You: “Of course it does don’t be stupid…”
![4DE4525C-3289-4898-B610-93F2F52D70B1.jpeg]( "4DE4525C-3289-4898-B610-93F2F52D70B1.jpeg")
But, you know - it doesn’t make a difference.
The bbc which is, publicly owned doesn’t show adverts but has a license fee.
ITV and Channel 5 do show adverts and are privately owned.
Channel Four is publicly owned and does show adverts.
