I'd rather be poor in America than rich in many other countries in this world.
In the past I had a part time job for a local social services provider and I had to go to peoples homes to have them fill out forms to receive social services if they weren't able to make it to our office to fill out forms. I lost count of how many "poor" people had a big screen TV, xbox, decent car and enough money to stock up on cigarettes and alcohol.
Assuming "America" is referring to the U.S. (remember "America" could be any country in Northern, Central, or Southern America), then we absolutely have our share of the homeless and hungry, including those without big screen televisions, cars, xboxes, or iPhones.
If we're going to have this argument, I'm thinking it shouldn't be anecdotal accounts of what particular "poor" families possess. We should define "poor" and compare numbers. I'm guessing that the U.S. will have lower poverty than some "first-world" countries, but also greater poverty than others. This will become even more interesting if we account for health and life satisfaction.
Anyway, even if we find our "poor" don't have it bad as say Mexico, or the Philippines, India, Africa, whatever, that doesn't mean we should accept poverty or that our poor somehow deserve their situation just because they're poor.
We're seeing greater concentration of wealth, especially in the U.S., than ever before. We're also seeing significant socializing of costs and privatizing of profits here in the U.S. with major efforts and spending to continue and expand that practice. That makes me think that if we wanted to, we could probably further address our poverty situation.
But yeah, statistically we certainly aren't the worst, and selfishly, thank goodness for that. But it's hard to comfort any of the dozen homeless I'll encounter on my way home tonight with that.
Anyway, you'll find the down-vote arrow just to the right there... click away.