Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
The original iPad was released April 2010 and was replaced by iPad 2 in march 2011.

If someone bought an orig. iPad new from Apple in let us say Feb 2011, that machine has a lifespan/support of roughly 1,5 year according to Apple.

I bought mine during the summer of 2010 so it is 2 years old now and as customer I atleast expect 3-4 years of lifespan/support for a computer or an iPad in this case.

I feel really screwed by Apple! :(
 
While I am very bothered by IOS 6 not running on my iPad 1 and I really don't like Apple's planned obsolesence I do have to say, my iPad 1 has been running really slow for about the last 2-3 months. I get frequent crashes in Safari and my keyboard lag is terrible. I had already planned on buying a new iPad this Fall. So the issue really won't effect me all that much but it is Apple's policy that bothers me. They really should be supporting a two year old device with new software updates longer than this.
 
I feel really screwed by Apple! :(
The only two options here are: 1) have Apple shoehorn iOS 6 onto the first iPad and deal with increased slowdowns and lag or 2) leave the first iPad at iOS 5 and have some apps not be compatible with the device.

Using the first gen iPad and iOS 5, it is pretty slow already. While certainly still usable, it's no longer has the fluid look and feel of the OS it originally shipped with (iOS 3).

I just checked the iOS App Store and of the first top 15 paid apps currently in the store, only the three Apple apps require iOS 5.

Your likely to see similar minimum OS requirements for a while even once iOS 6 comes out. Some apps will not be compatible with the older OS, but most will. Developers want to be able to sell their apps to the largest audience possible, so they aren't going to restrict that unless there is a very good reason to do so.
 
This is a bummer, but it has to be foreseen. As the tech gets older and the iOS gets more robust there are going to be faster model line drops. This is the first upgrade where my Gen3 Touch is on the outside and I'm fine with it. I hate the way it performs since upgrading from 5.0 anyway.

Besides it could be like Windows where they give really general specs and let people load it onto their machines to find out it won't work.
 
Uh. No point in me buying an iPad 3 when the iPad 4 will probably come out in March of 2013.
 
Since they support the iPhone 3gs which is even older and slower? I can't see that speed would be the issue?

The only two options here are: 1) have Apple shoehorn iOS 6 onto the first iPad and deal with increased slowdowns and lag or 2) leave the first iPad at iOS 5 and have some apps not be compatible with the device.


----------

Are the 3GS newer technology?

The iPad is old technology PERIOD!
I understand why the don't support it.
 
Uh. No point in me buying an iPad 3 when the iPad 4 will probably come out in March of 2013.
The performance between the 2 and 3 are not that far apart so yeah if you can get by with your original iPad i'd wait till next year. I'm going to wait for iOS6 performance impressions first before updating my iPad 2.
 
The performance between the 2 and 3 are not that far apart so yeah if you can get by with your original iPad i'd wait till next year. I'm going to wait for iOS6 performance impressions first before updating my iPad 2.
Yeah true I know what you mean =)
 
I kinda expected the iPad 1 not to be support cause Apple usually does 2 major iOS before ditching it.

They did. Remember it shipped with 3.x (2?). It took a few updates before the different strains of iOS were merged.
 
How is it not being supported? Do you expect them to throw in a free processor upgrade every two years?

I am not crazy, and no I don't expect that. But for company that prides itself on superior products I would like to think they would develop a product that won't be considered old and outdated in a one year period of time. Apple hasn't always been in the new model out every year game until around the birth of the iPod.

From my point of view, and that is all this is, doesn't seem like they should be releasing a product every year. Make one good solid product that will survive a two year period, then release the latest and great version with the newer technology. Unless there is some ground breaking new technology the first Gen device would still be powerful enough to run the software updates for up to a four year period. I mean, just because you add a new screen , slightly tweaked CPU, and a updated camera doesn't make it some ground breaking device. It's like taking a Harley and changing the pipes, and adding some after market chrome... It's just a face lift in the end.

They already had retina display at the time of the iPad two, and they already had better cameras. So why wasn't the iPad two the current three? I would have to think they did it just so they could continue on this one year cycle because they knew they had nothing truly ground breaking to offer in that time frame. So rather then break the one year cycle or have an iPad 3 released with just a software update, they held out and rationed the hardware.

Now don't get me wrong I am not Apple bashing, tons of other companies do this these days. I just think its sad that at the consumer level we have people who think this is an acceptable business practice. I see tons of people on here and other places basically saying , shut up or buy a new iPad. Here is my problem, the iPad one wasn't able to run some apps only a year after it's release because it couldn't handle some of the games designed for the iPad twos CPU. Fast forward a year after that and now the iPad two cannot run apps designed for the retina display. At the current price of these devices they are most certainly not a one year trend item. If I wanted a device that would have issues supporting software only a year later, there are much cheaper solutions out there for that. I think I paid $400 for my Ps3 5 years ago and it still plays they latest games. My tv I bought three years ago still able to display the latest HD movies and TV shows. My fridge I bought 6 years ago still makes ice cubes and keeps all the latest and greatest food cold lol.

But my iPad is already outdated and will need to be replaced within a two year period of time from purchase date to still be able to function as designed. Which by design and iPad is a portable devices capable of running software from a app store. Once apps no longer support your device in this said market place, that makes your devices out dated and obsolete in a sense. I bought a different type of apple last week.. Fuji apples to be exact. And I'll be damned if they still didn't stay cold in my fridge like the fridge is designed to do.


Point being in the end, Apple can do this because it's target consumer doesn't seem to care if the object they bought is pretty much obsolete or out dated the moment they walk out the door. Because next year the die hards will have the next generation no matter what. I'll still be happy with my little old man of an iPad two next year. And possibly the year that follows. Unless they release one with an ivy bridge :)
 
Last edited:
Everyone keeps using the wrong term. The iPad 1 will be supported by Apple (serviced) it just will not receive iOS6. I bet it will even get an updated (5.2?) iOS5 to include Maps.

This is completely normal throughout industry. Look at Google's ICS for the closest analogy. Only 7% of Androids have been updated. If you buy a TV do you expect firmware updates year after year after year?
 
Apple has spoiled their customers with continuous updates long after the device gets released, hence why people are upset. I was expecting them to not allow iOS 6 on my iPad, but I also understood why. Then came along the info that the 3GS would be supported. Now I'm just confused. Why support an older iPhone, but not a newer iPad? It has the same specs does it not? Also, my MacBook is over five years old, yet I can install Lion if I wish. This type of lifespan is one reason I prefer Apple products. I'm saddened by the fact they don't offer this kind of support for their iOS devices any longer. It makes my decision to get an iPhone more difficult.
 
Everyone keeps using the wrong term. The iPad 1 will be supported by Apple (serviced) it just will not receive iOS6. I bet it will even get an updated (5.2?) iOS5 to include Maps.

This is completely normal throughout industry. Look at Google's ICS for the closest analogy. Only 7% of Androids have been updated. If you buy a TV do you expect firmware updates year after year after year?

Gotta agree with all of this. I'm not what you would call an Apple fanbois but people seem to forget that the iPad is an electronic appliance and it's priced accordingly. Besides how you used it 2 years ago, you will still use it 4 years from now if it's still functioning.

And for the record my original Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 has received only to updates from Samsung and it's quite possible it won't get ICS which I was hoping for.
 
Only 7% reported are running ICS lol. Those numbers are much larger thanks to devs at XDA. I run ICS on both of my android based devices though it hasn't been released for either yet. And that is one selling point for Android devices, that they can still be updated after the first year of official updates. I currently run ICS with out issue on my kindle fire and Evo 3d. And even the original Evo can run ICS smoothly.
 
Everyone keeps using the wrong term. The iPad 1 will be supported by Apple (serviced) it just will not receive iOS6. I bet it will even get an updated (5.2?) iOS5 to include Maps.

This is completely normal throughout industry. Look at Google's ICS for the closest analogy. Only 7% of Androids have been updated. If you buy a TV do you expect firmware updates year after year after year?

The record doesn't point to this outcome. Within 1 month after iOS 6 is released, all devices that cannot run iOS 6 will stop receiving even minor patches to iOS 5 containing security-related bug fixes. This, in the computing industry, counts as "unsupported".
 
The record doesn't point to this outcome. Within 1 month after iOS 6 is released, all devices that cannot run iOS 6 will stop receiving even minor patches to iOS 5 containing security-related bug fixes. This, in the computing industry, counts as "unsupported".

Keep in mind that the iPad is in Apple's walled garden ecosystem. So unless you JB it you should be fine and if Apple discovered a major security risk they would patch it regardless of the OS.

But because you are boxed in Apple's locked world any security risk would be minimal.
 
The device has been out for 2 years and has gone through 3 iterations of iOS already. Deal with it.

I'll deal with it by not buying another iPad. These things are NOT cheap. They are not computers, but they're also not subsidized smartphones either.

I don't understand why a user would defend such a policy that enforces planned obsolescence in 2 years for a device that was up to about $900 when it was new.

I find people defending apple on this completely mystifying. The iPad is MORE capable technically than other devices that will be supported and this will lead to more iOS fragmentation that we all love to slam Android about. Adding support for the original iPad will NOT hold iOS 6 back. It is in large part the same components that are in all of the other devices, so it's not like they're having to write new different drivers or anything.

Apple receives the benefit of great user loyalty. I would simply expect some loyalty back to its users in return.
 
I don't understand why a user would defend such a policy that enforces planned obsolescence in 2 years for a device that was up to about $900 when it was new.

Apple receives the benefit of great user loyalty.

It really is tough to defend and I wouldn't but Apple is banking on (no pun intended) that you'll be back again for the latest and greatest because they've moved on. It's the same with videogame DLC and I do my best to refuse buying DLC especially since it's already on the media and you're just paying to unlock it after already paying $60.

The best way to send the message to Apple and other companies is not to buy the product. Look at Apple releasing the Smart Cover Case. They caved because others were doing it, so it was market driven. You can drive the market by not caving in.

But we all know resistance is futile. Even though I have an iPad 2 and 3 I know i'll buy the iPad 4 when it's released next year.
 
I'll deal with it by not buying another iPad. These things are NOT cheap. They are not computers, but they're also not subsidized smartphones either.

I don't understand why a user would defend such a policy that enforces planned obsolescence in 2 years for a device that was up to about $900 when it was new.

I find people defending apple on this completely mystifying. The iPad is MORE capable technically than other devices that will be supported and this will lead to more iOS fragmentation that we all love to slam Android about. Adding support for the original iPad will NOT hold iOS 6 back. It is in large part the same components that are in all of the other devices, so it's not like they're having to write new different drivers or anything.

Apple receives the benefit of great user loyalty. I would simply expect some loyalty back to its users in return.

I simply don't get the level of outrage in your post. The device is self-limiting; it has a processor/RAM combination that is capable of only so much. On the plus side, it will continue to do all of that well into the future.

I don't see where Apple has an ongoing responsibility to provide you with the latest functionality in every device they've sold in the past.
 
I simply don't get the level of outrage in your post. The device is self-limiting; it has a processor/RAM combination that is capable of only so much. On the plus side, it will continue to do all of that well into the future.

I don't see where Apple has an ongoing responsibility to provide you with the latest functionality in every device they've sold in the past.

Exactly, I may never see ICS on my Galaxy Tab 10.1 in the future. Am I mad at Samsung that they released an inferior Galaxy Tab 2 10.1 that has ICS? No, I accept it and move on to something else. Tablets are consumption devices that are designed for lots of turnover where customers move on and buy the latest device.

All one needs to do is sell their current device, gift it to a relative or donate it to charity but it will not stop functioning because the mfg has moved on to an updated product.

I'm not defending Apple because EVERYBODY does it in the Tablet world.
 
[/COLOR]
I'm not defending Apple because EVERYBODY does it in the Tablet world.
But Apple keeps on telling us that they are different and better than the competition, then mocking the competition for fragmentation. Do you really want to hold them to the standard of the inferior competition or do you want to expect something more out of hte company that tells us we should expect something more?
 
Keep in mind that the iPad is in Apple's walled garden ecosystem. So unless you JB it you should be fine and if Apple discovered a major security risk they would patch it regardless of the OS.

But because you are boxed in Apple's locked world any security risk would be minimal.

Major security breach such as the ability to accidentally view a PDF file that installs arbitrary code that can run with full administrator privileges? That sort of vulnerability has existed before -- you could have stayed completely within the walled garden and still you could have fallen victim to it.

This was the vulnerability that originally allowed version 2.0 of jailbreakme.com to function on devices running iOS 3.x.

The vulnerability was patched as part of iOS 4.0.2.

Therefore, any device which is incompatible with iOS 4, such as the original iPhone and original iPod touch, did not receive a patch and are still open to attack by such a technique. (Unless, of course, you actually did leave the walled garden by installing a jailbreak. In that case, you can use Cydia to install a 3rd party patch. How ironic...)

There you go: Major security vulnerability, with no official patch available to devices locked in to an old version of iOS, and able to attack people who choose to remain fully inside Apple's walled garden. Your whole argument kinda fell apart, didn't it?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.