When will we reach Mac OS 11!?
3) iOS Apps to work on the Mac. It's absurd that they don't. Use wrappers if you gotta.
Yes. Flat is trendy. It is not functionally better. Certain aspects of a flat design are actually inferior from a usability perspective, which is why Windows 3.11 was relegated to the past. But today's trendy users are too young to remember DOS and Win 3.11 so this step backwards actually feels new to them.People should realize that this 'flat design' is a trend, not an evolution.... and trends are bad to follow for operating systems...
Honestly kind of feels like Windows. 😕
How can it be called 10.10???? 10.10 is the same number as 10.1!!!!
It has to be OS11 already!!
How can it be called 10.10???? 10.10 is the same number as 10.1!!!!
It has to be OS11 already!!
This was done way better by Edgar Rios on Behance:
http://www.behance.net/gallery/The-next-Mac-OS/9995849
Image
I am not against a flat design, but I feel like it should come with better performance.
For example, the OS could take up less space and/or be able to render things faster if it does not have to constantly redraw big 3D icons, but instead simple flat icons.
Although, I presume the perceivable difference between flat and more complex 3D icons would be minimal at best even if everything was optimized to use smaller file sizes.
This was done way better by Edgar Rios on Behance:
http://www.behance.net/gallery/The-next-Mac-OS/9995849
Image
Looks like Windows 7. Don't look like Windows 7, please.
Why don't people get this? The dot in software version numbers is not a decimal point, it's just a separator - could just as easily been a ':' or '-', etc. - so the bit after the '.' is not a decimal fraction.
If it was a decimal point, how could you have 10.9.2? or 32.0.1700.107 (the current version of Chrome on OS X)?