Cutting and pasting on Windows:
1.Open Folder 1
2.Select Files you need to cut
3.Right click >> Cut/ CTRL +X
4.Open Folder 2
5.Right click >>Paste/CTRL+V
Cutting and pasting on OS X:
1.Open Folder 1
2.Open Folder 2
3.Select the files you need to cut
4.CMD + DRAG from Folder 1 to Folder 2
It's EXACTLY the same thing. You just need to get used to it. It does not require ANY extra work at all, so your analogy is flawed.
And about Append folders...it is NOT the more logical way. It's the most "Windowish" way.
If you copy a file to a place where another file with a same name is located, you don't expect them to be merged, but the older one to be replaced. So, append folders is just an extra feature, which some people may find useful and some not.
Why are you so blind to see??? Let me put it in simple terms for you... cut and paste works and i'm aware of that... here is where your understanding is very limited.. I'll give you some base-work first.
you are moving a file...
the file moves, the operating system checks to see if it completed, then deletes the original file... simple logic everybody understands this, you are stupid if you don't.
Now...
If you were to repeat this same BRILLIANT logic to folder moving then everything is perfect.
BUT
Instead of checking if the operation which you wanted to perform completed successfully, ie. MOVING THE WHOLE FOLDER!!!!! REGARDLESS of communication failure, and THEN and ONLY THEN delete the original folder and it's contents!! Not each individual file as it is moved. That would be like deleting byte by byte as a file is moved to the other location (completely illogical data loss can occur).
To move from one hard-drive in your system to another hard-drive in your system is totally different to moving to a network drive. MTBF increases 1000 fold depending on network quality.
The method i mentioned above is one solution, whereas, windows adopted a more efficient method which does delete files separately as they are moved BUT at least they made it default to append as folders are moved again incase of network failure.
Apple's finder does neither and because of this... Finder = Fail!!!
Instead they decided to program a not so useful feature - coverflow for finder.