Yes, but the post-move rearrangment isn't as pretty in 10.5...![]()
But it was more natural. This ordered layout makes me feel suffocated.
Yes, but the post-move rearrangment isn't as pretty in 10.5...![]()
But it was more natural. This ordered layout makes me feel suffocated.
This made me laugh hard.
Cause you're really gonna open that amount of Windows? Just take a look at how many open programs are down there!
Why are you so blind to see??? Let me put it in simple terms for you... cut and paste works and i'm aware of that... here is where your understanding is very limited.. I'll give you some base-work first.
you are moving a file...
the file moves, the operating system checks to see if it completed, then deletes the original file... simple logic everybody understands this, you are stupid if you don't.
Now...
If you were to repeat this same BRILLIANT logic to folder moving then everything is perfect.
BUT
Instead of checking if the operation which you wanted to perform completed successfully, ie. MOVING THE WHOLE FOLDER!!!!! REGARDLESS of communication failure, and THEN and ONLY THEN delete the original folder and it's contents!! Not each individual file as it is moved. That would be like deleting byte by byte as a file is moved to the other location (completely illogical data loss can occur).
To move from one hard-drive in your system to another hard-drive in your system is totally different to moving to a network drive. MTBF increases 1000 fold depending on network quality.
The method i mentioned above is one solution, whereas, windows adopted a more efficient method which does delete files separately as they are moved BUT at least they made it default to append as folders are moved again incase of network failure.
Apple's finder does neither and because of this... Finder = Fail!!!
Instead they decided to program a not so useful feature - coverflow for finder.
But it was more natural. This ordered layout makes me feel suffocated.
The new one is better. You've just enjoyed the mess and haven't really tried out a cleaner desktop.
I agree that the original expose feels more "natural" but it is quite useless. I am a developer and find it probably one of the most pointless window features (every single window looks the same since I code on them, so i have to mouse over every window... further more, windows aren't always in the same places so if makes it even more annoying. The SL expose solves a lot of these problems)
Furthermore, previewing windows is expose is a HUGE deal for coders. You can now just expose, no... Dock expose! into your xCode, everything is laid out properly, preview the mainApplication class to get a general overview of the class structure, and go back to your original file. Gotta keep this kind of user interaction up Apple, doing well here.
I do a bit of work in HyperCard, and getting an user-friendly interface for a seemingly simple Tic-Tac-Toe game took me months to complete.
Completely unusable.
Finder is a joke that's still waiting for its last laugh. I still can't believe Apple hasn't fixed it. Yes, the apologists will say whatever they want to fool themselves into thinking Finder just "works".
Things that seriously need consideration for Finder:
- Quit ALL windows on a single keystroke
- Decide what it wants to be. Currently it's skirting the line between a file manager and a file browser.
- Cut. Windows does this marvelously and don't give me some convoluted bullcrap about how it's "destructive" or what not. (like dragging icons out of the Dock isn't destructive enough, or how about the side bar?)
- Sidebar being more useful than just a bunch of shortcuts that poof out of existence when I drag them out (destructive again!)
----Suggestion: Items in the left sidebar can be dragged to the dock, since they both seem to be on the same plane of existence (poof to nothing)
- Better icon spacing. Holy cow, the next time Finder opens with a 50 row x 2 column view that doesn't automatically fit to content space when I drag the window border. Currently I have to drag it to a more rectangular view, and the right click and clean up (why does it not have auto cleanup??)
- Quick Look being tied to the window behind and overwrites the window commands behind it. How many times have I focused out of the quick look window to find that I'm now focused on the Finder window behind it? What ever window has Quick Look open will select quicklook whenever I select the window. I hate Quick Look blocks part of the window, when I select it, QUicklook still looks but is now out of focus.
- Quick Look having its own shortcuts, cmd - F in Quick Look sounds like it's going to go Full Screen, but NO! cmd-F makes the Finder window BEHIND it do a full system wide search, making your quick look screen show a pointlessly stupid looking search icon.
Now that Finder is in Cocoa, I can now take it more serious as it's in a platform to expand hugely over the next few years. Adding features to an age old Carbon app is quite a pain. iTunes, better hurry up!
Indeed. "Windows Explorer" IZ THE RULEZ![]()
I have a sneaking suspicion the Finder is going to take a back seat when SL is released. I've been using SL for a while now and I find myself using the finder less and less as each seed comes out. This is probably why Apple said they decided not to change the finder.
Now that Finder is in Cocoa, I can now take it more serious as it's in a platform to expand hugely over the next few years. Adding features to an age old Carbon app is quite a pain. iTunes, better hurry up!
And this made me laugh even harder.This made me laugh hard.
I can confirm CS4 works fine, but I haven't tried CS3. Sorry.
It's something with CS3, tried it on my MacBook and the same thing happened.
hmm, hopefully this is a bug that will get fixed before release, I have CS3 also, and am not looking to upgrade until CS5
hmm, hopefully this is a bug that will get fixed before release, I have CS3 also, and am not looking to upgrade until CS5
And this made me laugh even harder.
The Finder is a piece of crap compared to Windows Explorer.
well, they better do something to make up for how crap it is. Apple has no neat way of organizing large libraries of movies. Don't say itunes because itunes is a joke when it comes to movies and support for different formats.
I will be relieved if they make something to offset finder's incompetence, but i still think we deserve a descent file browser.
Any way to turn off icon preview mode inside stacks in Grid/Fan view? This is one thing that seems to still really cause problems for the system - dotted-line outlines FTW though right?
The 'recent items' stack that you can add with the help of Terminal does not load icon previews, and is all the better for it. Speaking of that, I wonder if it will ever make it in as a more visible option.
Edit: If that's the future of file browsing, count me out. I have to say I'm quite surprised that they're turning off HDs on the Desktop in SL by default (so far), and Grid view in stacks is my least favourite view - filenames longer than 10 characters = curtains, and no on-the-fly sorting = fail, not to mention no view customisation. They spent so long trying to kill off icon view in Finder, and now they're pushing something far worse - and the sorting that can be done in stacks doesn't work so far in SL either. Maybe there is more to come, but I think I'll stick to Finder windows.