3:2 would be unwieldy at 4.7" and 5.5". Works great in smaller sizes and tablet/labtop sizes, just not big screen phones.
That doesn't make any sense
3:2 would be unwieldy at 4.7" and 5.5". Works great in smaller sizes and tablet/labtop sizes, just not big screen phones.
I won't be happy until Apple crams 'em so full of pixels that they need to store some in extra dimensions!
And, please, for the love of my precarious sanity: GET. THE. PHONES. OFF. THE. GROUND.
Image
That doesn't make any sense
Fragmentation only occurs when you have scores of iOS versions that are unable to allow great apps to be created. Different hardware, sensor miscalibration, skins, hacks and more.
In comparison, more than 90% of devices run iOS 7 which contains the SDK needed to handle dynamic scaling of content. iOS 8 even more so. I know as a developer that I need to change my very old app (2010) to use these more modern frameworks.
But... you can bet your bottom dollar that my app will work on the newer version with maybe some letter boxing or something. I can then get the device and test thoroughly and be done.
So I wouldn't call it fragmentation if it doesn't pull any additional resources on the developer to support those devices (which it won't).
so the 5.5inch iPhone is going to have more pixels in the long direction than the 7.9 and 9.7 inch iPads??
That doesn't make any sense
They did that with the 5, where I everything was the same size and all we got was a few additional lines of text. The whole point in going towards a larger screen size is so that zooming in to see/read content is no longer required.
I don't quite understand the 5.5" bandwagon. I mean we've all seen the galaxy note. it's just way too big to be a functional phone.
just like a 27" MacBook Pro wouldnt be very practical, after a point it just becomes too much and nonsensical really. a phone in the 4" range seems good. any bigger and you need a tablet, not a phone. thoughts?
Waiting for 1080p to prove us wrong here.
Typing this one-handed on my Samsung Galaxy S5. Works perfectly well.
Those resolutions give the 5.5" iPhone 2.7x more pixels than the 4.7" iPhone. It'll be interesting to see if Apple does anything with the GPU besides just a small clock speed bump otherwise the 5.5" may be underpowered to run things at native resolution. Given how the iPad 3 struggles handling it's native resolution compared to the previous iPad 2 hopefully this won't be repeated.
Let's hope the 4.7" is not the iPhone 6C.
If they give me a lot of down specs and features from 5.5" i will go with Samsung Alpha. From the 3.5" is ok for a phone to 5.5" for Apple is a long way.
And Eddy Cue said that Steve death not affects the culture of Apple
yes i would buy and love a 5.5" with the dimensions of Lg G3 but this will not be the case
I don't quite understand the 5.5" bandwagon. I mean we've all seen the galaxy note. it's just way too big to be a functional phone.
just like a 27" MacBook Pro wouldnt be very practical, after a point it just becomes too much and nonsensical really. a phone in the 4" range seems good. any bigger and you need a tablet, not a phone. thoughts?
461ppi on the 5.5"? Yes, please.
Oh, and don't forget the ~2900mAh battery!![]()
It does because how well the phone fits in human hands depends mostly on how wide (portrait orientation) it is, not how long. That's why I like the iPhone 5. It's longer, but you can hold it the same way.
He writes and hosts a podcast about Apple products, software, and strategy. If you read this page, you'll see that he grosses almost $500K/year for website advertising sales. He also gets significant chunk revenue from his podcast, although I'm guessing it's significantly less the website revenue.
He's a professional that writes about Apple. You don't have to like it, clearly there are thousands of people who value his writing highly. His compensation is north of the 95th percentile for traditional journalists.
What alternative descriptor would you use for someone who writes and discusses the tech industry -- and has a viable business model for his writing? Unless you can suggest some alternative that makes sense, "journalist" sounds just fine to me.
Prominent Apple journalist John Gruber has now given his in-depth take on the subject, suggesting that the 4.7-inch iPhone 6 will likely feature a resolution of 1334 x 750 with 326 pixels per inch, while the 5.5-inch iPhone 6 would most likely have a resolution of 2208 x 1242 with 461 pixels per per inch.
Well, if the 5.5" has a higher ppi, then that's what I'll get. Now I just need to find jeans with larger pockets.
Well, if the 5.5" has a higher ppi, then that's what I'll get. Now I just need to find jeans with larger pockets.
Umm, the current A7 runs iPads at 2048x1536 just fine and dandy. Same exact CPU/GPU that's inside the iPhone. I imagine a new and improved A8 will have ZERO problems driving this hypothetical 461ppi 5.5" display smooth as butter.
People seem to forget that iPads much higher resolution is being powered by the same chip inside iPhones.