I'm reminded while seeing all this of some really excellent stuff about trends and marketing that Seth Godin talks about, the true innovator in a field almost always wins out, the followers and copiers don't. Doesn't even matter if the follower or copier can do some things better than the innovator, in the end, it won't matter.
iPhone/Apple = Innovator
Palm Pre = Follower
iPhone > Palm Pre
The competition is good mind you as Apple does need to raise the bar, there's no question in anyone but a troll (and I see a few in this thread) the iPhone can multitask and do things probably much better than the Pre could, but doesn't, that said, the iPhone already does quite a few things better than the Pre, and no competition does everything better than it's other competitors. Where the iPhone has succeeded, also taking into consideration what it is, and that it's NOT the first smart phone (by a long shot), but that it innovated itself into the one to watch, and everyone else now is just copiers, is that it's the bar. When a company, be it Palm or Blackberry, is doing it's darndest to outdo the top dog and basically play follower, which is all I guess they can do, it shows their weakness, NOT iPhones. So I have to LOL at all the jockular "that's it, iPhone is toast" from people very uneducated in how markets work. iPhone has momentum and the other day I heard someone calling their (woefully laughably bad) Instinct an "iPhone," not the first time, but "iPhone" has slowly to some taken over as ubiquitous for "any smart phone," all the copiers out there are against a pretty much never-going-to-be top spot position. It's laughable and ignorant to think otherwise.