Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
By spoofing an Apple device ID?

Palm was wrong in their approach, and Apple was wrong in theirs first. Apple doesn't have the right to block Palm's vendor ID. 2 wrongs don't make a right, and so Palm should be punished under the USB consortium's wrath the same as Apple... That being said, Apple was still wrong, and that's the problem here.
 
And that is fair and true... As long as Apple doesn't BLOCK others souly based on their VIDs.

Let me try this on for size: Apple can support, or not, any player they want. But if they don't want to support one, they don't have the privilege, under the agreements they signed with the USB consortium, to simply block everything else based on USB VIDs. THEREFORE, if Palm wants to choose to support the transfer protocols, Apple has to find SOME OTHER way to block it. That is the debate here, not weather or not Apple CAN block the Pre.

I'm not sure they did block them simply based on their USB VID. I think the way it was done was like this:

iTunes: Hello USB device. What are you?

Pre: Hello iTunes, I'm an iPod.

iTunes: Really? Who makes you?

Pre: Palm.

iTunes: Liar. Palm doesn't make iPods. You are an invalid, unrecognizable device. Good bye.

I could be wrong, but I don't think this is a violation of the USB rules.

Now, What Palm did... That is a HUGE violation.
 
Well played, and I agree. While Amarok does plug it's self into 2 different music stores, they are not, even combined, worth comparing to the iTunes music store in terms of variety of music. If they added Amazon, they might get closer, but that's a ways off. Therefore, your right that the iTMS is better.

And until Amarok is stable on the mac, and has a better music store, no one will be crying to Apple loud enough for them to hear.

That does not, however, make it right for Apple to block us. I only hope that Amarok one day DOES get a bit of a foothold so the users can have a loud enough voice to get Apple to stop taking our freedoms away.

And I stand corrected: http://amarok.kde.org/en/node/446
It would appear that Amarok DOES support the iTunes Music Store, and therefore, one argument less in the name of iTunes.

Now I'm just waiting for the stable windows and mac ports for users to clammer behind!
 
That's well said except for one point...Apple never has to grant third-party software seeking to replace iTunes access to the Music, Movie or App Stores. Those are paid for by Apple, hosted on Apple server farms, and subject to licensing agreements between Apple and the various music labels, movie studios and app developers.

So it's fine for software developers to offer alternatives to iTunes as music/media organization and jukebox software, but people shouldn't expect to get all the other features that are provided by iTunes (just because they "want" them or feel entitled to them).


I'm really sorry for taking a side rant... But this needed to be said.


Really? And why not? If I was a software developer and I wanted to make a piece of software similar to iTunes. Why shouldnt I be allowed to do so? People need to realize that there are plenty of other people willing and wanting to make alternatives to commercial software, that are not only better, but are not run by the big huge corp. I would like it if Apple at least told us WHAT exactly iTunes DOES, so we can at least have people make other alternatives.

I will not go as far as to say that iTunes is a music/media organization software... Because frankly there is no power in the 'verse that will get me to click that "do you want iTunes to organize your music folder?".
 
I'm not sure they did block them simply based on their USB VID. I think the way it was done was like this:

iTunes: Hello USB device. What are you?

Pre: Hello iTunes, I'm an iPod.

iTunes: Really? Who makes you?

Pre: Palm.

iTunes: Liar. Palm doesn't make iPods. You are an invalid, unrecognizable device. Good bye.

I could be wrong, but I don't think this is a violation of the USB rules.

Now, What Palm did... That is a HUGE violation.

:D I really like that dialogue. And if that were the case, then Apple might be safe from the USB wrath, and your right, Palm is VERY MUCH in the cross-hairs... However, I would be very disappointed in Palm to find that to be true... If palm is going to lay themselves on the cutting board in that fashion, you would think they would have asked their lawyers first, and made sure Apple was going down with them... I mean, there is a huge risk in being wrong. In their minds, Apple screwed up, and Apple's going down. If Apple goes down, Palm will go down with them, taking one for the team. In your case, Palm goes down, and Apple reigns supreme.

I'm now VERY curious to see how this plays out...
 
I know everyone here is an Apple fan but Apple's iTunes is truly just an mp3 store/player. Apple's current situation with palm is reminding me more or less with Microsoft's browser wars and only time can tell what the outcome of this craziness shall be. If you bought music from one store, you should be able to play it on any MP3 player in my opinion. Being locked to one hardware vendor is lame. I like my iPod but I would like to opportunity to switch to an other brand if I wished to do so.

Totally and completely agreed.
 
I'm really sorry for taking a side rant... But this needed to be answered.


Really? And why not? If I was a software developer and I wanted to make a piece of software similar to iTunes. Why shouldnt I be allowed to do so? People need to realize that there are plenty of other people willing and wanting to make alternatives to commercial software, that are not only better, but are not run by the big huge corp. I would like it if Apple at least told us WHAT exactly iTunes DOES, so we can at least have people make other alternatives.

I will not go as far as to say that iTunes is a music/media organization software... Because frankly there is no power in the verse that will get me to click that "do you want iTunes to organize your music folder?".

Let me alter my statement just a bit. As long as you are not making money off of this third-party software, then have at it, develop a freeware alternative. Otherwise, you don't have the right to piggyback on Apple's investment in all of the things I originally mentioned to help you make a quick buck.

But then again, Apple might not really care, as they don't make any money directly off of iTunes and people would still be buying content from them using your software. So I guess this would probably go unchallenged.
 
I know everyone here is an Apple fan but Apple's iTunes is truly just an mp3 store/player. Apple's current situation with palm is reminding me more or less with Microsoft's browser wars and only time can tell what the outcome of this craziness shall be. If you bought music from one store, you should be able to play it on any MP3 player in my opinion. Being locked to one hardware vendor is lame. I like my iPod but I would like to opportunity to switch to an other brand if I wished to do so.

Totally and completely agreed.

You do know you can already do that, right?
 
Except for the part where the poster was totally and completely WRONG.

In what way was the original poster wrong? He's right that this is similar to the browser wars, in that if you buy an ipod, you have no choice but to use iTunes, and Apple is seeing to it that that fact continues to be true by encrypting the newer iProduct's libraries. The OP was also correct that only time will tell how the outcome will be. It is also true that, while there are work arounds, there isn't an easy way of getting your iTMS music onto another device; Certainly not a way of doing it without installing half a dozen music applications.
 
and where pray tell was that original poster wrong on his opinions?

You can already use your iTMS purchases on any player that supports AAC.

there isn't an easy way of getting your iTMS music onto another device; Certainly not a way of doing it without installing half a dozen music applications.

I played my DRM-free iTMS purchases on my blackberry by merely dragging the files to the memory card.
 
:D I really like that dialogue. And if that were the case, then Apple might be safe from the USB wrath, and your right, Palm is VERY MUCH in the cross-hairs... However, I would be very disappointed in Palm to find that to be true... If palm is going to lay themselves on the cutting board in that fashion, you would think they would have asked their lawyers first, and made sure Apple was going down with them... I mean, there is a huge risk in being wrong. In their minds, Apple screwed up, and Apple's going down. If Apple goes down, Palm will go down with them, taking one for the team. In your case, Palm goes down, and Apple reigns supreme.

I'm now VERY curious to see how this plays out...

I'm not sure they did ask their lawyers before going through with this. What lawyer would have let them say "it works with iTunes" when they have no control over the iTunes software. They are now forced to make their device work with a 3rd party software, without the 3rd party's approval, because they advertised it as a feature. That is a legal nightmare. You can't advertise a feature that you can't deliver. Not without some legal trouble.
 
And that is fair and true... As long as Apple doesn't BLOCK others souly based on their VIDs.

Let me try this on for size: Apple can support, or not, any player they want. But if they don't want to support one, they don't have the privilege, under the agreements they signed with the USB consortium, to simply block everything else based on USB VIDs. THEREFORE, if Palm wants to choose to support the transfer protocols, Apple has to find SOME OTHER way to block it. That is the debate here, not weather or not Apple CAN block the Pre.


palm_pre-usb_info.png


Palm is wrong. That is all.
 
um. no. ENCRYPTED AAC yes. & I would love to see a list of MP3 players out there that play encrypted AAC...besides the obvious Apple products. :cool:

You're right, I should have been more clear.

DRM-free purchases can be used on any player that supports AAC. Which is the entire store, and your entire library should you choose to upgrade.
 
In what way was the original poster wrong?

and where pray tell was that original poster wrong on his opinions?

I'm sorry, I thought you said you had "been reading through this whole message thread". Did you mean the WHOLE thread, or just the posts that you were in agreement with? Because this poster was rebutted quite effectively earlier. Not to say his "opinions" were wrong per se, but that he was basing them on a completely fallacious premise. I could outline the counter-argument again, but I really shouldn't have to for someone who read the whole thread.
 
You can already use your iTMS purchases on any player that supports AAC.



I played my DRM-free iTMS purchases on my blackberry by merely dragging the files to the memory card.

And if you used Amarok, you wouldn't have had to take that "Drag and Drop" step. Now try using a non-Apple product to transfer to an iPhone....
 
And if you used Amarok, you wouldn't have had to take that "Drag and Drop" step. Now try using a non-Apple product to transfer to an iPhone....

And if I used Amarok, I would be using Linux, and not have the complete user experience with my computer that I enjoy right now. I've used Linux, for years, and as a primary system on several machines. I'd rather use my computer than tweak it.
 
Thank you

I'm sorry, I thought you said you had "been reading through this whole message thread". Did you mean the WHOLE thread, or just the posts that you were in agreement with? Because this poster was rebutted quite effectively earlier. Not to say his "opinions" were wrong per se, but that he was basing them on a completely fallacious premise. I could outline the counter-argument again, but I really shouldn't have to for someone who read the whole thread.

Thank you for correcting me. I re-read back and saw the counter argument. I tend to skim when there are 22 freaking pages of comments lol.

So again thank you. I was wrong. it does happen occasionally. :D
 
Ouch

And if I used Amarok, I would be using Linux, and not have the complete user experience with my computer that I enjoy right now. I've used Linux, for years, and as a primary system on several machines. I'd rather use my computer than tweak it.

OUCH, I felt that way over here...
 
Now try using a non-Apple product to transfer to an iPhone....

Why are people going on about things that have nothing to do with the issue at hand? Whether I want to be able to use a Cuisinart Food Processor to transfer songs to my iPhone is not the issue here surely, the issue is that Palm have a device that is pretending to be something it isn't, by using vendor IDs that belong to another company. It doesn't matter whether Apple would be better served in your opinion by letting us sync our blackberry smoothie using iTunes, nor whether you think overall their business practices are sensible. You can transfer purchases made with iTunes to other devices, but even if you couldn't, that would be the risk you took by buying them from iTunes, much as those who bought from the "playsforsure" camp did. It has no relevance to the current thread.

Palm is stealing vendor IDs. Surely that's where the discussion ends.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.