Still grabbing at straws eh?
Once again, this is not akin to jailbreaking. Who is Apple gonna sue? And for what exactly? Lets say the Dev team is the authority on this. The fact that they are not
A) A publicly traded company with a competing product
or B) not charging for their software
means that they are nothing alike. Don't you know Woz is in full support of the jailbreaking community? I'd bet the "responses" have been in response to heat from ATT, and that apple could probably care less, just like OSX86, but these, sir, are nothing alike. Apple loses nothing from jailbreakers, but palm perpetrating this tomfoolery could cost them actual tangible sales of iPods and iPhones from customers who want bonafide iTunes syncing, something that's an Apple only feature.
Anyway, i'll keep posting this image until people get it through their thick skulls that Palm is wrong, point blank, and have no valid reasoning for doing this:
Courtesy DVD Jon.