Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Some people can tell the difference in quality...

You're right, Phil- we're not asking for it anymore; we've given up hope. Self-fulfilling prophecy much?

As for me, I'll stop being interested in Blu-ray as soon as there's something better. There isn't yet- certainly not iTunes.

Couldn't agree more. :) Phil, can we please legally watch BluRay on the Mac?
 
There's no real reason to have the Blu-ray drive built in to your device.
I mean why not just have a separate drive for your iMac, if you really want to watch movies on it that is.
Most people watch Blu-ray movies on their wide screen TV's on a Blu-ray player. if you own a MacBook and say you're planning on travelling and want to take some Blu-ray movies with you to watch, it would be better to rip them to a portable hard drive rather than carry a bundle of discs.

I dont think Phil is saying "people dont want Blu-ray quality movies anymore" but like the thread title states, he's talking about "built-in" blu-ray.

However Apple should come up with a WiFi capable external Blu-ray player so you can stream blu-ray movies to your Mac's. Now that would be cool! :cool:
I think the Apple TV needs to evolve or Apple should sell an additional Apple TV model, larger of course, that has Blu-Ray. I'd certainly buy one. :D
 
I suppose it's not such a big deal considering we have a proper home theatre setup downstairs for watching movies (Bluray all the way, digital distribution can go **** itself).

However, not asking for it and not wanting it anymore are two different things.
 
This! All these so-called videophiles espousing the the virtues of blu-ray quality...which is completely lost on a 27" screen. Gimmee a break.

An 27" iMac and my rMBP has more resolution than my 55" screen. But that's not the point. If the Mac mini had a BR player, it would make for a sweet HTPC/desktop PC in one small package and there wouldn't be a need for a separate BR player.
 
Internet

There are still many of us denied broadband internet because of where we live. One option is through a Internet provider with a 5 gig/month limit. The size of an os update.
 
An 27" iMac and my rMBP has more resolution than my 55" screen. But that's not the point. If the Mac mini had a BR player, it would make for a sweet HTPC/desktop PC in one small package and there wouldn't be a need for a separate BR player.

And if they put a document scanner in my iMac there wouldn't be a need for a separate scanner. Whats your point?
 
What? I'm using an internal Blu-Ray drive and burner with software that supports playing Blu-Ray disks and I also have software for burning blu-Ray disks. So what are you talking about? This is on my Mac, not in Bootcamp.

And what software is that? Is it as simple to use as a standalone player? Does it play all discs, or is every new Blu Ray release unplayable until they patch the software? Do you have to insert the disc, rip it, then play it, or can you simply insert and play commercial movies?

Most of the reviews I've read for macblurayplayer.com say that software is horrible. I have an older version of dvdfab, and that software is pretty junky and grossly overpriced; I don't trust them enough to buy their new product that supposedly plays Blu Rays.
 
And if they put a document scanner in my iMac there wouldn't be a need for a separate scanner. Whats your point?

I know a lot of people find this odd, we still need the huge scanner printer combo yet the idea of a small external drive is a no go. A lot of that comes from just the principle of the matter and value, like on another post on this topic I talked about how I was okay with a sub two hundred dollar netbook not having a drive, yet a it is not okay leaving it out of a fifteen hundred dollar laptop or desktop.

At some point I will think if an external is that bad (laptops) depending how often I end up using them along with there being a real reason for it not to be there (more power? battery?)
 
*You* can "pretty much" guarantee it? Ok good. Great. If I have issues in the next half-century finding a Blu-Ray compatible drive that will work with a then-modern computer, I should come find *you* and you'll take care of it? I should only have 3-4 exabytes of data for you to recover by then.

Let me give you a few exercises so you can demonstrate the quality of your 'guarantee'.
  1. Find me a cassette drive so that I can pull some software for an Apple II from it.
  2. Find me a working 8" floppy drive that I can plug into my system.
  3. Find me a punch-card reader that will interface with a Windows 8 laptop.
  4. Now find me some software that will run on my computer (under either OS X 10.8 or Windows 7, your choice) that will allow me to read and recover the data I have stored in a Microsoft Works word processor file from 1993.

These are the issues with what most people think of as 'long-term' archives. Changes to undocumented formats, changes to hardware so profound that you've got to chain 3 or more adapters in order to allow you to plug it in, and that doesn't even guarantee it'll actually do the job at that point. And I'm not even talking about spans of time as long as the life-spans claimed by 'archival quality' optical media today. (Most notably because we weren't using electronic, or even electromechanical, computers yet that long ago.)

The fact of the matter is you *can't* guarantee it. You can't even guarantee that the 'archival quality' disc will last more than a decade. In practice, many 'archival quality' CD-Rs, with manufacturer estimated life spans of 50+ years, failed inside of 10 years despite being stored according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Burnable DVDs are a bit better, but still have the same root issue. Why? Because those life spans are estimated (based on standard tests, yes, but those test give numbers that cannot be verified, because even *pressed* CDs haven't been around long verify a life-span that long). Even 'archival quality' discs commonly have an *unburned* shelf-life of 5-10 years, even the *best* 'archival quality' discs have dyes which will degrade in less than a month of exposure to sunlight.

No, you can't guarantee that *any* individual instance of media will last as long as its manufacturer claims, but no optical media labeled 'archival quality' by it's manufacturer has lived up to those claims in practice yet. (As you said, CD-Rs, one of the earliest wide-spread writable optical formats, are less than 30 years old, and the manufacturers claim terms longer than that for their life spans, though quite a large number of those discs have since failed.) Pressed discs, I'd give decent odds on that front, but pressed discs aren't used or archives. They're used for mass reproduction of the same data on thousands or millions of blanks.

Even with proper storage, the National Archives site recommends that you test your optical archive media "at least every two years to assure your records are still readable", presumably so you can catch the 'bit-rot' in the dyes before it exceeds the capabilities of the format's error correction measures. And this is in their FAQ on how to deal with storing *Temporary Records*.

Professional archival groups are busy looking for *actual* long-term storage solutions, because none of what we have now actually fit the bill.



Very, very, very well said.

For anyone who has any doubts (or disputes), they should go read Clifford Sthol's book from the 1990s, "Silicone Snake Oil...". In a nutshell, the task of data archiving is going to become less robust (= more fragile) because the days of "file and forget" are gone - - it is going to take a recurring investment to actively monitor and maintain the systems...and it is not just data, but also data formats, the applications that support the same, the OS versions that support those applications' versions, etc, etc.

Stohl has an example in his book of some NASA data that had been professionally archived ... and it was "successful" in the sense that the data was still intact - - but the problem was that the physical means to read in the data from its media form had been lost.

FWIW, I'm sure that Apple's belief paradigm is that the Cloud is going to solve all these problems. On the one hand it does, since it is continuously maintained - - but on the other hand, it won't be a free service forever, so when Uncle Bob dies and his account goes dormant for a year and a day (or whatever metric), we can pretty much be assured that his data will go **poof** and gone forever.


-hh
 
Yes, in the future. Yes, I said optical discs will die a slow death.
Oh, so "in the future"! You've "been saying it on here for 3 years: physical media is DEAD." So is it DEAD or it will die in the future "a slow death"? It sounds like you are taking back your words?

And yes, Blu-Ray will never have the market success that DVD had.
No one said it will. There are more Toyota owners then Mercedes owners. There are also more Windows users vs. Mac users. Some are OK with mediocre quality video streaming and limited title availability, for others it's best or nothing. To each its own.

We have entered the "post-optical disc" era.
Netflix is reporting in Aug 2012 that 62% optical media rental and only 38% streaming dvds-blu-ray-disc-rentals-still-surpass-streaming/ It does not look like "post-optical disc" era. Does it?

And BR player sales are booming:

2woa88y.jpg



Selection is constantly improving. I never claimed streaming was the same quality as Blu-Ray. It will improve as bandwidth increases. We are at the start of a new paradigm, the transition will take a while. That doesn't change the fact that it's happening.
"It will" yes, but for now it's a long way to go. 3 main problems with streaming today:
1. Limited movie selection, about a third (compare to optical disk)
2. Average video/audio quality (compare to BR disk)
3. Fast Internet connection is not available in all areas or not affordable to everyone.


um, okayyyy. I thought everyone knew that. What's your point?
Well, you've said that digital is the future. So Blu-Ray is digital.
 
Last edited:
Backing up

I do IT work and I am burning DVD data disks a lot. It would be much better if I can have 25 Gigs on a 5 inch disk instead of 4 Gigs. I don't care about the movies and never did.

Think about it like this, to make a stable backup of a hard drive with 250 Gigs on it, I would need 63 DVD's or 32 DVD/DL Disks, I would like to use 10 BlueRays disks, if Apple ever supports BlueRay drives and gives us the choice to get one.

I cant help but to wonder, if they ever allowed people the option, how well they would sell? Even as an external drive with out the BlueRay move support. I know I would get one, even for $300+!
 
Was there a single post in this thread that pointed out the following:

1. The people asking for Blu-ray playback support in OS X are not necessarily the same people who want Apple to provide built-in Blu-ray drives in their computers. They are two separate issues. I could care less about built-in Blu-ray drives. What I do care about is built-in codec and software support for Blu-ray playback. Most people in this thread are erroneously conflating the two, including Phil Schiller himself.

2. Apple optical drives suck, and always have, therefore, getting rid of them was a good thing. Anyone who knows the slightest thing about optical drives (hello, my fellow CDFreaks/MyCE!) knows that the slim style drives that Apple used in every machine except for the Mac Pro don't even remotely compare to what are often termed half-height drives, the kind that can only be installed in a full size desktop machine or a 5 1/4" external enclosure. Not only that, but they are the part that is absolutely and without a doubt the most prone to error and failure. Good riddance. If you care about optical media, then you shouldn't give a damn about Apple optical drives.

+1

I think this is the most valuable post I've seen on this thread. I've always assumed [incorrectly] that anyone could just buy a third party drive, then plug & play.

How good are the third party codecs offered out there for Mac? I see some available on the web but have never tried them. Do they support drives or rips of BRs only?

As an owner of 5 Macs (past & present), I agree their optical drives are terrible, so not offering the option on a drive is fine, but not supporting the codecs is something else.
 
Apple doesn't ignore anyone, just get yourself an external optical drive. It fits your usage perfectly. What's your problem? Don't you see your type of usage is quite specific and therefore doesn't justify Apple needing to build this into every Mac?

Optical drives are old tecnology, you don't incorporate old technology into your products, you make them available additionally for those who do want it.

I really, really, really do NOT see the problem. External drives are fine, perfect.

Well, I thought I was pretty clear. To me (and I am entitled to my opinion) the Apple sales pitch is "everything built to work together." If a percentage of the population needs this media (and I believe it is a larger percentage than you clearly do -- we can agree to disagree), then Apple faces a choice: give people what they want, or understand that they will choose otherwise. "I really, really really, do NOT see" why the Apple "fan boys" are so offended when people provide their honest opinion. I have been the route of "aftermarket upgrades" with Dell/Windows -- didn't like it, which is why I went Mac a few years ago. I am simply saying that, as a consumer, I may make a choice to switch back because Apple is ignoring my desires. Sorry, that's just the free market, whether you like it or not.
 
Well, I thought I was pretty clear. To me (and I am entitled to my opinion) the Apple sales pitch is "everything built to work together." If a percentage of the population needs this media (and I believe it is a larger percentage than you clearly do -- we can agree to disagree), then Apple faces a choice: give people what they want, or understand that they will choose otherwise. "I really, really really, do NOT see" why the Apple "fan boys" are so offended when people provide their honest opinion. I have been the route of "aftermarket upgrades" with Dell/Windows -- didn't like it, which is why I went Mac a few years ago. I am simply saying that, as a consumer, I may make a choice to switch back because Apple is ignoring my desires. Sorry, that's just the free market, whether you like it or not.

I agree. For years and years I avoided, even despised, Apple products because of this seemingly overly rigid path all customers were forced onto. However, in the last few years, I jumped in with both feet (iPhone, iPad, Apple TV, iPod nano, and an iMac) because it seemed like my interests were actually being carefully considered.

This feels like the bad old days. I am being excluded because, as others have posted, I cannot get unlimited Internet access in my area. So, it seems unlikely the next computer will be an optical drive-free Mac.
 
Well, I thought I was pretty clear. To me (and I am entitled to my opinion) the Apple sales pitch is "everything built to work together." If a percentage of the population needs this media (and I believe it is a larger percentage than you clearly do -- we can agree to disagree), then Apple faces a choice: give people what they want, or understand that they will choose otherwise. "I really, really really, do NOT see" why the Apple "fan boys" are so offended when people provide their honest opinion. I have been the route of "aftermarket upgrades" with Dell/Windows -- didn't like it, which is why I went Mac a few years ago. I am simply saying that, as a consumer, I may make a choice to switch back because Apple is ignoring my desires. Sorry, that's just the free market, whether you like it or not.

Yea, it's a free market. Sony offers excellent all-in-one iMac alternative:

1. BluRay optical drive
2. Brilliant LED display (made by Sony not LG) utilizing Sony’s X-Reality picture processing engine.
3. Touchscreen. Comes with the ArtRage Studio: a stylish, intuitive painting and drawing package
4. NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M 2GB graphics, HDMI
5. Sony's Rapid Wake technology - instant on
6. Sony S-Master amplifier, and HD Audio with S-FORCE Surround
7. Media remote control
8. TV tuner

and of course you will find all the stuff imac has: wireless keyboard/mouse, hd webcam, SD/memory stick, i7, USB3, bluethooth, wifi, etc.
 
43 pages of posts and people are still saying "the only options are a built-in optical drive or high-speed Internet". I love it.
 
Death to Optical Drives

I'm glad to see optical drives go. I don't want them part of my computer. If I want one, let me get a USB or other external. Frankly, I prefer streaming movies to physical data anytime. I have an Apple TV and pull movies off my hard drive, it works great. Netflix and Hulu are becoming must have.

I'm planning on buying a new iMac next year and like the direction they are going. I'm also going to get a Thunderbolt Drobo for backup. It's a much better solution than stacks of plastic.
 
Netflix is reporting in Aug 2012 that 62% optical media rental and only 38% streaming dvds-blu-ray-disc-rentals-still-surpass-streaming/ It does not look like "post-optical disc" era. Does it?

And BR player sales are booming:

Image

Blu Ray player sales are anything but booming. The increases are expected for a new format, but they continue to disappoint the industry as they fall far short of the growth that DVD saw at this point in its life cycle. Its just another illustration that Blu Ray came too late to the party.

While revenue from Blu Ray disc sales and rentals increased 23% in Q1 2012 over Q1 2011, overall physical media sales (DVD & Blu Ray combined) dropped .63%. In other words, Blu Ray's increases are coming from DVD's losses, and the combined physical disc market continues to decline. (http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/30/netflix-blu-ray-lead-home-entertainment-back-to-growth/)

In contrast, subscription streaming during the same quarter was up a whopping 545%.

Consumers have spoken. Blu Ray will continue to replace DVD as the format of choice for physical media, while at the same time the overall market for physical discs continues to crater.
 
I do IT work and I am burning DVD data disks a lot. It would be much better if I can have 25 Gigs on a 5 inch disk instead of 4 Gigs. I don't care about the movies and never did.

Think about it like this, to make a stable backup of a hard drive with 250 Gigs on it, I would need 63 DVD's or 32 DVD/DL Disks, I would like to use 10 BlueRays disks, if Apple ever supports BlueRay drives and gives us the choice to get one.

I cant help but to wonder, if they ever allowed people the option, how well they would sell? Even as an external drive with out the BlueRay move support. I know I would get one, even for $300+!
I put a BD-R in my Mac. You can get 50GB BD-R discs, which is only 5 discs for 250GB of data.

I only use Verbatim disc media, and if you buy in spindles, you can find them for right around $1 per 25GB disc.
 
It will take a long time for blu-ray to disappear. And any "theory" that it will be soon is right up there with other tin foil hat theories.

Yes. Streaming is up. But that's irrelevant to the fact that there's still a large audience and value to having true high definition video and uncompressed audio.

VHS didn't die quickly. DVDs aren't dying quickly. So I don't know why people think that Blu-Rays are going to be gone anytime soon.

More odd - is how some people for some whacked reason - seem to take "glee" in the fact that streaming is winning over blu-ray and accept it as a good thing.

I've said it before on this thread - I find it a complete "switch" of logic coming from Apple fans who more often than most prides themselves on having the best quality products.

Blu Ray player sales are anything but booming. The increases are expected for a new format, but they continue to disappoint the industry as they fall far short of the growth that DVD saw at this point in its life cycle. Its just another illustration that Blu Ray came too late to the party.

While revenue from Blu Ray disc sales and rentals increased 23% in Q1 2012 over Q1 2011, overall physical media sales (DVD & Blu Ray combined) dropped .63%. In other words, Blu Ray's increases are coming from DVD's losses, and the combined physical disc market continues to decline. (http://paidcontent.org/2012/04/30/netflix-blu-ray-lead-home-entertainment-back-to-growth/)

In contrast, subscription streaming during the same quarter was up a whopping 545%.

Consumers have spoken. Blu Ray will continue to replace DVD as the format of choice for physical media, while at the same time the overall market for physical discs continues to crater.
 
I don't often watch movies on my TV at home, but when I do, I prefer BluRay.

Nice!!!

Yea, it's a free market. Sony offers excellent all-in-one iMac alternative:

1. BluRay optical drive
2. Brilliant LED display (made by Sony not LG) utilizing Sony’s X-Reality picture processing engine.
3. Touchscreen. Comes with the ArtRage Studio: a stylish, intuitive painting and drawing package
4. NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M 2GB graphics, HDMI
5. Sony's Rapid Wake technology - instant on
6. Sony S-Master amplifier, and HD Audio with S-FORCE Surround
7. Media remote control
8. TV tuner

and of course you will find all the stuff imac has: wireless keyboard/mouse, hd webcam, SD/memory stick, i7, USB3, bluethooth, wifi, etc.

I wish Sony still made a traditional desktop. I had a Vaio desktop in 2003 and it was rock solid, + Sony has nice style to their stuff as well. Always preferred their stuff to Samsungs. Personal preference of course.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not really see why people are so pissed about the blue ray ... :confused:

Because our 2-3 year old dSLR has 1080p which we've been experimenting with for home movies ... only to find that Apple's kicked HD to the doorstop.


Wow, I'm a pretty big fan of :apple: stuff but so many of you are sipping the :apple:kool aid way too hard.

I actually can't believe how many of you are actually buying movies on iTunes...

Tried downloading one trailer to my AppleTV. After a half hour, killed the session.

Perhaps Apple will get a clue from this as to why I've not yet tried to download my FREE upgrade copy of Mountain Lion .. either.

must be nice to live where you do and have super fast broadband in every home capable of downloading/streaming everything

IMNSHO, someone should go force the Apple leaders to go live in a mid-level Hotel room for a weekend, and give them a Mac that needs a re-install. Tell them that they don't eat/drink until the download's successfully run. Oh, and no cheating by recovering from the hidden partition.


You may jest (I can't tell how much) but I can see a day when serious Pros will indeed jump from OS X...

My photography stuff costs a couple of multiples of what my Mac Pro setup cost - - to switch to Windows is a very logical decision when the PC is merely a peripheral.

The way I see it overall, Phil is absolutely correct in that most Apple customers aren't asking for built-in Blu-Ray ... of course that's because an optical drive won't fit in an iPhone.

-hh
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.