Came here for the bitchy anti-Cook/anti-Schiller/anti-Apple comments. More salty than a force nine storm at sea. You guys should def. bitch more in every single article.
It is absolute nonsense to describe the iPhone as 'earth-shattering'. It was a significant step forward in the art, but it was only an evolutionary step. Palm/Treo had been offering smart phones for a number of years before the iPhone emerged, and had a significant third-party developer base offering a wide-range of applications (including satnav).
This is a demonstrably incorrect statement. OLED is great for television, not so great for displays that are mostly static, white, used in daylight.Just a heads up Phil, the iPhone display has been matched and beaten - in both overall quality and resolution - by the many manufacturers using OLED.
iPhone still is amazing. But yeah, as for unmatched, this new Xiaomi Mi Mix is ridiculously amazing.Unmatched? Is he taking the piss?
I will probably move away from the iPhone after my SE gives up the ghost. There are better value and options now and with my withdrawal of away from expensive and obsolete Macs continue I see no need to stay in the ecosystem at this point.
I am an Apple loyalist, but not a blind one. The iPhone is surpassed in a few ways. For example, still no way to handle local attachments in email, still can't choose default apps, still stuck on an arbitrary grid for icons, and maybe one or two more things I can't think of right now. Nothing major, just small things.
The Mac doesn't change that much and it's still better than windows. Why? Because it's more polished.
Do you really want your iPhone to look like a swiss army knife??
I don't think there are really. The only Android phone that's safe to use is the Pixel, and it costs $250 more than the SE, and will probably only be supported for 2 years (through late 2018 in other words). The SE's cheaper, I think better, and will be supported almost for sure longer than that. (Apple seems to be doing 5 years from the time a new CPU/GPU gets released, which isn't great by Windows PC standards, but is fantastic by ultra mobile standards, unfortunately).
Microsoft's phones are nice too, but usually cost as much or more, and of course so far don't have as good "app" support, although can do quite a few things better.
Because a grid of apps is an efficient way to list them. I have no trouble attaching things in email but yeah, there is room for improvement. Not sure why Apple seems to be dragging their feet on setting defaults. Still, overall I do not think anyone else is perfect either.I am an Apple loyalist, but not a blind one. The iPhone is surpassed in a few ways. For example, still no way to handle local attachments in email, still can't choose default apps, still stuck on an arbitrary grid for icons, and maybe one or two more things I can't think of right now. Nothing major, just small things.
It is absolute nonsense to describe the iPhone as 'earth-shattering'. It was a significant step forward in the art, but it was only an evolutionary step. Palm/Treo had been offering smart phones for a number of years before the iPhone emerged, and had a significant third-party developer base offering a wide-range of applications (including satnav).
To commemorate the tenth anniversary of the iPhone, Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller sat down with tech journalist Steven Levy for a wide-ranging interview about the smartphone's past, present, and future.
![]()
The report first reflects upon the iPhone's lack of support for third-party apps in its first year. The argument inside Apple was split between whether the iPhone should be a closed device like the iPod, or an open platform like the Mac, a discussion that Schiller said was ultimately "shut down" by then-CEO Steve Jobs.Levy suggested that the iPhone's great moment was when the App Store launched a year later, creating a world where for "every imaginable activity" there was "an app for that." Schiller, perhaps unsurprisingly as Apple's marketing chief, said that belief undermines how truly "earth-shattering" the iPhone was at the time.
![]()
Nowadays, some critics are wondering whether Apple is playing it safe as of late, arguing that recent iPhone models have only incremental improvements rather than revolutionary new features. But, again, Schiller downplayed this notion and said the changes in more recent iPhones are "sometimes even bigger now."Schiller positioned the iPhone as a top smartphone. "The quality is unmatched. The ease of use is still unmatched. The integration of hardware software is unmatched. We're not about the cheapest, we're not about the most, we're about the best."
In a press release yesterday, Schiller said Apple is "just getting started" with the iPhone, while CEO Tim Cook promised "the best is yet to come." Building upon those comments, Schiller told Levy that he hopes in 50 years, people will indeed look back and realize how much was yet to come.Levy, however, went on to question "whether a pocket-sized device like the iPhone will still be as relevant decades hence," particularly as "a lot of observers have been saying we are at the start of the era of the conversational interface."
![]()
At CES last week, for example, a number of reputable publications said Amazon's Alexa platform "stole the show" or offered similar accolades, after companies showed off everything from new cars and robots to fridges and laundry machines integrated with the voice-controlled assistant, which launched in late 2014.
Apple itself had an early lead in this artificial intelligence space when it debuted Siri on the iPhone 4s in 2011.
Schiller opined that "the best intelligent assistant is the one that's with you all the time," such as the iPhone. Schiller added that "people are forgetting the value and importance of the display," which he said is "not going to go away."Full-Length Article: Phil Schiller on iPhone's Launch, How It Changed Apple, and Why It Will Keep Going for 50 Years
Article Link: Phil Schiller Says iPhone Was 'Earth-Shattering' Ten Years Ago and Remains 'Unmatched' Today
Sensors that can integrate with Siri so she knows when the phone is being held (and therefore a display can be read) vs when she is set down on a surface and therefore needs to respond audibly to a query. I think the phone already has that ability to communicate to Siri in such a way but if it does, it's not working for me.So those of you who snicker at Apple's perceived lack of innovation, tell me: what would you add to the iPhone in 2017 that would be a "revolutionary" feature?
iPhone still is amazing. But yeah, as for unmatched, this new Xiaomi Mi Mix is ridiculously amazing.