I agree. I stopped scrolling when I saw that. The bokeh is excellent and I love the colors in the piece. It's beautiful.
That makes me feel I have some bit of talent.
I agree. I stopped scrolling when I saw that. The bokeh is excellent and I love the colors in the piece. It's beautiful.
Fort Frederik, in Frederiksted, St. Croix, constructed to protect the town from pirate raids and attacks from rival imperialist nations...
![]()
Keep them coming!If anyone's tired of my Caribbean beach shots... let me know
That's quite special.Love the colours and mood.
Here is a photo I took the other night: (Hope you can see it properly)
![]()
Picture taken in Low, Province of Québec, Canada. I find it a bit too tight at the top and back of the bird. I'll see if I can "decrop" it a bit. What are your taughts ? I love those eyes
Canon 40D, 400mm, ISO 800, 1/500sec, f/6.3
![]()
You're on a roll, Reef. I love how the V-shapes of light at the top and right echo the V-shape of the two hills meeting in the foreground. My eye keeps going back to that uppermost 'chevron' and resting there before following the diagonals around the frame again. It's a very good example of a photo that doesn't really have a distinct 'subject' but nevertheless has a strong focal point.
A while back Doylem asked how I put together these triptychs. Shortly after I had someone else ask me, so I decided to try my hand at writing a tutorial about it. If you're interested, you can read my tutorial here. Critiques of my tutorial are welcome.
Pretty cliche shot, but the sky had a painterly look to it. I wish there was a plane or maybe a flock of birds to add something of interest to all the empty space. Oh well
![]()
Ah god what have I started..Equipment doesn't make a good shot.
see above pleaseSo true.
and again, I'm not focused on gear. I had a 1000D for my first year of photography and I got some cracking shots out of it. I didn't upgrade my camera for better pictures as such, It did more (especially the video.) I upgraded my 50mm 1.8 to a 1.4 because I knew, technically (reviews, test etc) it was a better lens and it's focus ring is much better for video. I'm not some fool who thinks having the best will make him the best. I'd like to make that quite clear as I like this place and don't want to be seen as your typical idiot. But thanks for your comment, I do understand lighting and composition.People that are focused on gear instead of the photograph always amaze me. He thinks that if he used his 50mm 1.4, the should would have came out phenomenal. IMO, he could have got the exact same shot because he doesn't understand lighting, nor composition...
Henri Cartier Bresson had a worse lens than your "crappy" 18-55, but somehow took striking photos. I wonder...
What? That makes it a totally different lens. Thats like saying 'ha! the canon 50mm 1.8 is a great lens! And its not even canon, it's nikon!' hahaNot to mention the 18-55 is nothing nowhere near "crappy". I only have that lens, and it's not even Canon, it's Sony![]()
ANYWAY I didn't even really mean what I said, just rushed meaningless drabble really.
Fog shots tend to work the best when there's something that leads the eye into the distance as the light and detail fade out, or when there's a looming shape working against some featureless negative space. Next time, try a shot along a tree-lined path, with fewer distracting branches and leaves- or shoot a wider angle or from father back if you've got a lot of stuff going in all directions- the eye likes leading lines to lead it around a picture and a jumble of lines tends to confuse the composition.
Paul
Interesting shot, the red walls paint a different picture to that of what I'm use to situated by the ocean.
I've noticed you've been making good use of your new ND filters as of late![]()