Ultimately, apple's ads make reference to YOU. Not the universe, your universe.
Damn, and I was hoping for a new app ...
iWarp?
iFlux?
iFTL?
You know, something that folds time/space?
Ultimately, apple's ads make reference to YOU. Not the universe, your universe.
Not to dig up old rumors... (but isn't that what this site is about?)
What if expanding your universe was about the ability to deploy applications in windows (I believe they used to refer to it as Yellow Box). This could attract more developers to the platform since you could write once and deploy for both platforms....
Just thought I'd stir the pot a little.![]()
![]()
Not to dig up old rumors... (but isn't that what this site is about?)
What if expanding your universe was about the ability to deploy applications in windows (I believe they used to refer to it as Yellow Box). This could attract more developers to the platform since you could write once and deploy for both platforms....
Just thought I'd stir the pot a little.![]()
![]()
Err.. Java already IS a core part of Mac OS X (note the lowercase "c"). It certainly doesn't deserve "Core" status (like Core Image, Core Audio, etc.), though.
i could almost see that this time, revering to "universe" as "universal" expand your universal app?
I'm calling it:
OS XI will be named after planets or something with astronomy.
Anyone yhink apple is kicking themselves in the teeth a bit here?
leopard is really cool, it does this and this and this and you cant live with out it. All that buzz, but its not ready! Ouch. If i was apple i would downlplay te leopard slightly and open iphone to developers, and throw in a product announcement to take attention away from the nonexistant leopard.
What do you think about the possibility of having the option to have Windows embeded into Leopard? Perhaps one could get Leopard alone for X dollars or Leopard with full windows functionality (? Vista) for X + $100. For those of us who need windows to run some work applications (VPN) this would be an ideal solution. I would rather have it embedded (and secure) than to have to install it myself and worry about updating it regularly (service packs, etc). Basically, what if the recent cozy Jobs/Gates session signalled a degree of partnership coming?
Definitely true that virtual desktops are not a new concept. I've been using them for at least a decade and I highly doubt the concept was brand new at that point.
Apple is really pushing the idea of "Space". The time machine theme, universe theme, and of course spaces.
I think we could probably see a lot more 3D GUI.
Yes, I agree with the point you were trying to make. I just wanted to point out something that you may have missed.Right, but a direct OS X port of PLG would be failing to utilize better technologies and have the whole UI running off a Java-based program that's clunky as hell. E.g. flipping windows would mean every window would be running directly off java.
I always presumed PLG was more of a conceptual development to experiment with working in a 3d environment rather than a serious attempt at a replacement GUI.
As i say, we can taker some cool ideas from it (flippy windows in Dashboard, etc.) but porting the whole project into OS X would be crazy.
Anybody think that the 'expand your universe' banner could be the new finder?
I.e. Apps all over like stars and planets and you probably click and drag to move them around to find what you want then click the app to open?
Just a thought although its not very workflow efficient unless spotlight search is a big part of it.
![]()
This was already mentioned earlier in this thread, and the Quick Look feature in Leopard's Finder is the answer to fill this need....or maybe "coverflow" type option for the finder.
Anybody think that the 'expand your universe' banner could be the new finder?
I.e. Apps all over like stars and planets and you probably click and drag to move them around to find what you want then click the app to open?
Just a thought although its not very workflow efficient unless spotlight search is a big part of it.
![]()