Am I the only one that thinks the quality looks too good to be a knock-off? Also aren't knockoffs not allowed to have logos of the actual product at all?
Could be wrong on that second point but I remember hearing that somewhere.
BULL
Apple isn't in the habit of putting their brands and FCC information on TEST devices. Idiocy is alive and well on the net.
That matte iPhone back had the model # and FCC branding on it, Both turned out to be correct.
That matte iPhone back had the model # and FCC branding on it, Both turned out to be correct.
Looks convincing to me. I think it's a prototype and what we'll see in June may be somewhat similar, but very different at the same time (more refined, pleasant looking). I'm just excited there was a front facing camera and a new OS!
Hm...this is odd, it's syntactical yet non-sensical...explanation needed*
I only have one question after reading this post. Why in the heck would someone leave the next generation iPhone laying around in a bar in San Jose?!? The only thing I can think of is someone left it there as a hoax.
I have read other posts stating that the design is very un-Apple and I totally agree. I'm not a big fan of this design at all.
You need explanation on what?
Come on!!!!! this is an insult to Apple if we thought they designed something this uninspiring. its prob a chinese fake or something
You need to clarify exactly what you mean. What matte iPhone and when? Cundolini wants his hand back.
Right, ready for production, however if I remember right the prototype MacBook Air does NOT have MacBook Air badging...