Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
User-serviceable battery?

Someone on engadget seems to think so:

iphone%204g.jpg


That's a fairly good argument for what we're looking at regarding the seams...
 
No way.

Ugly.

Seams are very noticeable

Square, Apple hates squares.

80GBs nope. There is not 80GB chips.


Chinese made POS attempt at a iphone

Doesn't work yea believable.

Doesn't fit apple design at all.

I would keep my 3GS over this ugly thing.


Kindergarten fail. Refresher course below..

A Square:

Square.gif


A Rectangle:
shape-rectangle.gif


Hope that helps the few, dimmer bulbs among us on the forums :)
 
New individual volume buttons make sense

While the back story does sound a bit dubious (if it's true, whoever lost it also lost their head), I'm inclined to believe that this could be a prototype.

It has seams? Yeah? It's a prototype. Apple never intended for the public to see it.

I think that some of the physical features in this alleged prototype might make it into the next generation iPhone:

- Individual volume buttons: Given that iPhone 4's camera will sport a 5mp (or higher) sensor, this new iPhone will assume the role of of main point and shoot for many people. Not having a physical shutter button is a limitation in this regard for existing iPhones.
Having individual buttons would solve that. When in the camera app, one of those buttons could function as a shutter.

Also, a combination of pressing both buttons could activate a screen orientation lock. You can't do that with the existing volume rocker.

The bottom line is that the iPhone needs more physical buttons and separating the volume rocker into two, achieves this without adding more clutter.

- Metal side, glass top, plastic back.

- Front facing camera
 
The 80GBs of storage really gets me. The iPad tops out at 64GBs right now, and yet an iPhone released about three months later will have 80?
 
Someone on engadget seems to think so:

iphone%204g.jpg


That's a fairly good argument for what we're looking at regarding the seams...

Except for the fact it uses a standard sized SIM card.

Again, clearly a fake. Apple would not produce 2 comparable components when they have the exact same functionality.


Not user replaceable. That side has the the "headphone jack", silent switch and toggle buttons. Unless they came up with some "magical" way to connect all that so the user doesn't damage when taking off the side - uh NO.

What am I missing on the sim? Aren't all iPhones using full size sims?
 
No way this is the next gen iphone.100 % chinese knock-off.

Its impossible to conceive something so horrendous the second time after creating products like the iphone and the ipad.

This must be like a $100 Win OS version that made to appear iphone like.

:eek:
 
Very un Apple like, could be a prototype but I doubt its the finished product.
 
It wouldn't have all the FCC logos and crap on there.

*Sorry

If it were real it would not have all that on there. I can guarantee you that the FCC has NOT approved the new iPhone yet.
 
The design looks nice. It's time Apple implemented some new hardware concepts, so I'm hoping this will be legit.

The volume rocker controls are hideous though.

If it is a fake, it's DAMN fine. Kudos to you Chinese KIRF makers, you rock!
 
This says fake to me: Apparently the phone was found on the floor of a San Jose bar inside of an iPhone 3G case.

1. No one but a real moron would forget they were carrying around a prototype iPhone 4G and leave it in a bar.

2. Why would Apple go from beautiful design to something so plain and boring as that?
 
And for the fact it uses a standard sized SIM card....

The iPhone will continue to use a standard SIM. They will not put the micro-SIM in an iPhone. The whole point of the micro-SIM in the iPad is so that users won't stick their iPhone SIMs in an iPad and use that data.
 
It wouldn't have all the FCC logos and crap on there.

Why not? Fakes put all kinds of crap on devices to make them seem legit.

This is a fake. Not anywhere near Apple's design style, the specs don't make sense, and the story is dubious. Someone "loses" it AND it won't boot? Not likely. Even if it were remote wiped, it would still boot.
 
Why are we saying it's fake? It has a pretty realistic story.. being left in a bar, etc. And what looks to be legit pics. Just because it looks like garbage doesn't mean its fake, it could be a prototype.

Because it's really unlikely Apple would let this get out of their facility, let alone let it get into a bar.
 
I'm really amazed at how many people are taking sides even after themselves admitting this is at best a prototype...

Prototypes are rarely sexy, they rarely have flashing lights and aesthetically pleasing curves.

The pictures are rather blurry, it's also a little hard to see how big the thing actually is. It would be cool if they took a picture of it side by side with a 3g so we could see the actual physical difference in size (if any).
 
1. IF this is an iPhone, then sad to say it is the final design, as no prototypes should have the brand and regulatory data on it.

Using bare minimum extrapolatory skills, this is NOT something Johnny Ive would approve of and thus this is NOT an iPhone.

2. Metal case? I'm sorry, are we able to drive radio signals through metals so much more efficiently that we no longer even need a plastic radio access port such as on the original iPhone and all iPod Touch models? Have we advanced that much since the last iPhone release? What's next? Transparent aluminum?

Just like the iPad video from the year's start, I'm calling it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.