Reminds me of the new Lumia phones. I wonder if it'll have the same $130 price tag?
Considering the iPhone five is $129 with a contract; I would say that this phone is going sell for about $99 (or less) to prepaid carriers.
Reminds me of the new Lumia phones. I wonder if it'll have the same $130 price tag?
You can tell it's going to be junk just from that photo?
Tim loves these colors Image
I think its very arrogant by using the name "Lower-end" to describe the non-premium iphone that is going to be introduced in the near future. Its like the customers who purchase the non Lower-end iphone is privileged or rich or something like that. It doesnt roll with me and think its very childish. Thanks.
Looks very fake to me. Apple will not use cheap plastic like that.
Why do you care what it looks like? It's only going to be available in "emerging markets" so you wont be able to get it even if you did want it.Just what i've always wanted, a bright neon green iPhone![]()
Why do you care what it looks like? It's only going to be available in "emerging markets" so you wont be able to get it even if you did want it.
Why do you care what it looks like? It's only going to be available in "emerging markets" so you wont be able to get it even if you did want it.
As in now, for example, the low cost iPhone for consumers is the iPhone 4 & 4S, are they not? The options already exist for those reasons.
huge mistake, this will only do damage to apple's brand
Not sure about those colours tbh.
I don't think you quite understood my post. The thing is there is no gap....the 4 and 4S do not "exist for those reasons" lol... they simply still exist because they are OLD MODELS. They aren't an "option" that Apple came out with to fill a gap... they are just old models.
These new phones will exist to fill a gap. That is the point of them.
----------
How so? More people will be able to purchase Apple products... that's the goal. How would expanding your customer base be a bad thing?
Unless, of course, you think they are opening the door to endless options and therefore spreading themselves too thin. I hardly think offering a slightly less expensive option to the world is opening said door. That's just my opinion.
Appleboys "Samsung are stupid for having a cheaper range".....nek minnit.
For me it will come down to spec, I don't want a new iPhone 5c (c for color) only to have it based on the 5 or 4s which I can get now.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...93336.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hpp_MIDDLEFourthNews
According to the WSJ Apple has lost 44% of their stock value since sep last year. This phone could represent a potential move into the Chinese market where low cost devices are much more in demand.
The implication of this action could however mean that Apple is about to turn into any other of the short term stock price chasing companies like HP, Dell etc. A company that don´t care about great products. Only stock prices.
What do you think?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...93336.html?mod=WSJEUROPE_hpp_MIDDLEFourthNews
According to the WSJ Apple has lost 44% of their stock value since sep last year. This phone could represent a potential move into the Chinese market where low cost devices are much more in demand.
The implication of this action could however mean that Apple is about to turn into any other of the short term stock price chasing companies like HP, Dell etc. A company that don´t care about great products. Only stock prices.
What do you think?