Assuming Apple transitions from Intel to ARM CPUs for the Mac platform, it would actually be “optimized for desktop on ARM/MacOS. The same MacOS we have now. But running on a different architecture, as Apple has done twice before.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Potential Benchmark for iPhone XR Successor Shows 4GB RAM, Moderate Performance Gains
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well, Apple did release the iPhone 4, and the number 4 is uber bad luck in Chinese and Japanese culture.
Sure, it's an interesting vision (like I said, Ubuntu and Microsoft have also had it). It's also possible existing approaches were basically sound, but slightly ahead of their time.
For now, Apple seems to prefer the different approach of Continuity — separate devices that try to smoothly exchange information, with several levels of iteration (Handoff, then Universal Clipboard later on, soon Sidecar).
I can’t believe they will put an upgraded A12 in the new XR as the fact that the XR had the same processor as the XS and the XS Max was a major factor in making it the best seller. If they don’t do the same this time then it might not make it as successful as the old one.
I'm still on my 8+, so I'm right there with ya but double check those dim's. The physical size of the XR is < 2mm narrower and < 7mm shorter. It's mainly the screen that's smaller. And the resolution of that screen is smaller than than the XS. Choosing between these 3 phones is a paradox of choice for sure.
sorry, I was reading some earlier posts that were suggesting it would be an A12+. If that’s not the case then scratch my comment.
I haven’t checked out the XR in person really and with the 2019 edition about to drop, obviously will wait on the new dim’s, screen type and res specs before considering. Thanks for the heads up. Good idea to compare to the X for res and to the X and older Plus models for body comparison.
XR and its younger brother.
The XR displays as much on-screen information as the XS Max and has the same SoC, but is much, much cheaper, particularly if you want more than 64 GB.
The SoC upgrades are likely partially for the camera, AR, gaming etc.
That along with the RAM upgrades also are good for device longevity.
It's a big-little architecture. Four small cores are generally reserved for low power mode. There are advantages for both 2 and 4 big core architectures. You are correct about the web browser scenarios although Chrome and Mozilla browsers now support some forms of multithreading in their rendering engines. On the other hand, having very power hungry cores may be one reason why Apple screw up the power management in the infamous case where they had to introduce throttling in older phone models because the phones were crashing because of power usage spikes when the battery charge levels were still at above 30%.By having 33% more cores
Most apps and especially websites will benefit more from single-core. Almost zero apps will use the 855’s eight cores.
Say what? Apple cores are more efficient that anything ARM, Samsung or Qualcomm have. Anandtech has already proven this with their extensive deep dive into all three processors. Some quotes:
"Apple’s small cores are just such an incredible contrast here: Even though the absolute power isn’t that much bigger than the Cortex A55 cores, the Tempest and Mistral cores are 2.5x faster than an A55, which also results in energy efficiency that is around 2x better."
"Apple’s SoCs have better energy efficiency than all recent Android SoCs while having a nearly 2x performance advantage. I wouldn’t be surprised that if we were to normalise for energy used, Apple would have a 3x performance lead."
Seriously, where do you come up with this stuff?
I was talking about the big cores. The excerpt you quoted is about the small cores. The simple scenario where Apple CPU may be at disadvantage is when the CPU needs to use a single BIG core. Apple's BIG core is way bigger than Qualcomm's BIG core and probably is more power hungry. But again, any design involves tradeoffs.
No, the one excerpt is about the small cores. The other is about the SoC overall.
Yes Apples big cores can take more power when running wide open, but they are still more efficient than anything else on the market when you compare power consumed to work performed.
""there's nothing obviously wrong with the result."
One thing obviously wrong with it is that it appears to reflect LPDDR4 at the exact same speed as today's iPhone.
This is not absolutely dispositive (Apple could be avoiding LPDDR5 because not enough can be supplied to meet their needs) but it is a red flag.
It is also possible that, with rebranding higher-end iPhones as iPhone Pro, Apple will feel free to provide more differences between them, especially when this is forced on them. So, eg the iPhone Pro could get the limited supplies of LPDD5, while the iPhone XRnext gets LPDDR4.
It's not clear how much segmentation for the SoC itself makes sense (as opposed to eg RAM and flash) but one can imagine ways they might do it: For example THIS phone could be getting what is essentially a slightly faster A12 (maybe a few bug fixes, nothing more), while the Pro phone gets the real A13. (cf the way iPads are split into the Pro models that get the super cool SoC, and the non Pro models get a phone SoC).
Then next year the mid-range iPhones (ie iPhone XRnext_next) gets A13 while iPhone Pro gets A14.
A business model like this actually makes a whole lot of sense...
One thing obviously wrong with it is that it appears to reflect LPDDR4 at the exact same speed as today's iPhone.
This is not absolutely dispositive (Apple could be avoiding LPDDR5 because not enough can be supplied to meet their needs) but it is a red flag.
It is also possible that, with rebranding higher-end iPhones as iPhone Pro, Apple will feel free to provide more differences between them, especially when this is forced on them. So, eg the iPhone Pro could get the limited supplies of LPDD5, while the iPhone XRnext gets LPDDR4.
It's not clear how much segmentation for the SoC itself makes sense (as opposed to eg RAM and flash) but one can imagine ways they might do it: For example THIS phone could be getting what is essentially a slightly faster A12 (maybe a few bug fixes, nothing more), while the Pro phone gets the real A13. (cf the way iPads are split into the Pro models that get the super cool SoC, and the non Pro models get a phone SoC).
Then next year the mid-range iPhones (ie iPhone XRnext_next) gets A13 while iPhone Pro gets A14.
A business model like this actually makes a whole lot of sense...
Your example of "all sorts of useful software" is an app that doesn't even exist yet?
Being specialised is why it took until 2019 for an iPad to even connect to an external hard drive, while Android tablets have fully featured OSs.
If you're talking about Photoshop, it's been in beta since last year. There have even been Photoshop for iPad previews published already.
I suspect the release version is going to be announced in the next 1-2 months, at either the September event, or else a separate October/November event.
BTW, LumaFusion on the iPad is making major inroads. There is nothing even remotely comparable on the Android side.
I mentioned Photoshop because I know it’s a sore point for many who pretend the iPad is a “toy”. Even without Photoshop iOS is still light years ahead of Android on tablets. We currently have Apps like Pixelmator, Affinity or Procreate, which have nothing on Android that’s even close. Also LumaFusion mentioned above.
But hey, if you think there are comparable Apps on Android then why not list them?
Adobe Premiere Clip
FilmoraGo
KineMaster
PowerDirector
Aviary Photo Editor
Bonfire
Snapseed
Sorry, none of those are even close to the ones I mentioned. Try to actually run some of these Apps instead of doing a search and making up a list.
Being able to briefly untether your watch is a FAR cry from it being “standalone”!
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204641
The instructions for updating it begin with “make sure your iPhone is on the latest version.
Standalone would imply that you could own and use an Apple Watch, WITHOUT owning/using an iPhone... which you simply cannot.
It is my understanding that the Apple Watch doesn’t have its own # registered on a network or anything, rather it does a fancy “cloning” of your iPhone SIM & passes the calls/messages/notifications sent to that device... so, if you canceled service on your iPhone, your Apple Watch would not do that anymore.
That is, by definition, a companion device (with limited autonomy), again... NOT a standalone device.
I already tried to explain it. I was accused of "lying" and "taking things out of context" just for copy pasting Apple's own website. Good luck.