The reason I don't focus on the past of computers in order to gain perspective on the present (with regards to value) is because using such a past as the computer industry has, as a viewpoint through which to perceive the present, is so distorting, that they may as well be entirely separate subjects, due to the incredible differences in proportion, and the fact that computers were in their very utmost infancy, back then. Compared to that time, sure, space is dirt cheap, but it's also used much quicker now. Those once expensive grains of special megabyte sand have been formed into the glass that is your modern, very high density hard drive, and the etching acuity is proportionate to the once stick (in the sand), now hand (in the glass), writer's dexterity (Mac OS Standard versus Extended). Note that, somewhere within that simile, there is some sense to be made...I'm not completely sure where. The history of paper, is also probably a good simile for computer storage space. The operating system, alone, takes up 1 gig on average (OS X). a videogame frequently uses 1-2gb. Many graphics apps range from 200-800mb total, including all the extra plugins and other files that may be required or useful. Those $15k storage devices from the past wouldn't even hold 1/3 of the Photoshop 7 application program file itself. If you want to use the past to view the present, in computer hardware, you absolutely have to multiply the numbers. Perhaps we don't know or appreciate how good we have it now, us persons who grew up with multiple gig hds and hundreds of mhz. However, if you get stuck in the past, then your perception of the present, in such a fast moving field, can make you a little too appreciative and a little less shrewd...in the computer industry. If you want good perspective from history, view civilian and country/worldwide, sociopolitical history. In the computer industry, history is not subject to repeating itself so closely, because the concepts are constantly growing, advancing and metamorphosing, but yet are, and may always be, comparatively simple and localized. Meanwhile, the human mind, though learning wonderful new things, is not advancing upon some of the absolute necessities, like good sense. But, of course, this is all opinion. Anyway, I hope you enjoy your camera. I'm only grazing the edge, money-wise, of the prosumer digicam field, and so I would prefer a Sony DSC-F717 5mp. Though, if I were interested in higher grade (and higher cost) prosumer or fully pro digital cameras, I'd probably buy Canon. They take very very, nice pictures. And, seeing as how I have no lenses or other similar investments, there would be nothing in the past to keep me from choosing what is absolutely my own preference, based upon quality (nothing mean intended, only something sharp and pointy). And, finally, to keep on topic, New G5s probably within a week, but they still won't be good enough for me, or my purposes.