Yes. Everyone that has issues with their phone are idiots and just don't know how magical the device is. Give me another big freakin break.
MAYBE THERE SHOULD BE A LAW! IF UR TOO F*CKIN STUPID TO USE A IPHONE, YOU CANT BUY ONE!
Yes. Everyone that has issues with their phone are idiots and just don't know how magical the device is. Give me another big freakin break.
I love my iPhone 4 - I got a case when I first got it, and it gets better reception than my old 3G. I think you're right - the Apple haters are just pouncing on something that's not a big deal.
Is it a design flaw? For sure. Does it make this device useless? Not at all.
I love how some people are comparing this to Toyota. Like uncontrollable acceleration is the same thing as a flawed antenna (which can be fixed by covering it with a case).
If Apple recalled all of them.. I'd probably not even send mine in. It just works. Maybe I get lucky by only using it in magical signal areas, but even when I've taken it to bad areas it's worked well. :/
Presumably Apple hired that team of antenna engineers to fix this one way or another.
glad i'm not the only one calling these tools out.
"hey, look, I'm an apple shareholder, so my opinions and what i post here hold more weight" ...."by the way, I own 2 shares of AAPL stock!"
so stupid![]()
can't agree more with you, it is mostly is where apple put the antenna not the antenna itself.
The number of shares I own is none of your business. You are wrong incidentally.
Whether you like it or not, AAPL shareholders are basically the people Apple needs to please. The primary responsibility of Apple's management team is to increase shareholder value. It does so by creating a solid business plan, executing, blah blah blah, but it's for the shareholders' benefit.
I'm also an Apple customer.
A defense of Apple is not, by definition, reflexive. Well, it may be in many cases here, but not in all cases. This absolutely is a design flaw, but this design choice also does some rather incredible things for the iPhone's ability to maintain a clear call with a poor signal. In practice, it is a better and more reliable phone than each previous model. So yeah, some folksespeically those who actually own the thing, and find themselves wondering 'WTF?' as they see all these reactionsdo have reason to chime in and say, well, "WTF?"I just don't get the reflexive defense ofon this. the 3G does not have this problem, the 4 does. Why not just admit
made a huge mistake and move on?
I think the really interesting question is finding out what motivates them. Seeing the typical responses here reminds me of a bunch of Jr. High students teasing another simply because that's what other students have directed them to do. Part of me wants to believe that there are mature people hereand I see them occasionally chime inbut I think the ones with the loudest mouths often-times manage to scream loud enough to drown them out.I love my iPhone 4 - I got a case when I first got it, and it gets better reception than my old 3G. I think you're right - the Apple haters are just pouncing on something that's not a big deal.
Eh, nothing new. They were probably comparing Bush or Obama to Hitler the other night (if not the person arguing with them in a discussion forum). The best part is that they probably never stop to realize how retarded the words coming out of their mouths are.I love how some people are comparing this to Toyota. Like uncontrollable acceleration is the same thing as a flawed antenna (which can be fixed by covering it with a case).
I've decided i'm returning my iPhone 4 and getting a Droid X because when i buy a $200 phone i only want 8GB memory and a mediocre camera. I want to spend $100 on a 32gb memory card so i can finally say that i have as much memory as an iPhone 4. Then i want the freedom to access countless and potentially hazardous third-party apps. I'm getting a Droid X because I love shotty UI. Oh yeah. It can make a call too so that makes it better![]()
![]()
How many apps do you need to buy to get to 200 bucks? How many of those does one actually use?
+1I can reproduce the signal reduction issue.
In the 3 weeks since I've had my phone, NOT ONCE has it been a factor for me. I hold my phone with my left hand.
ramuman said:Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; U; CPU iPhone OS 4_0 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/532.9 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/4.0.5 Mobile/8A293 Safari/6531.22.7)
What's funny is that if one of us says "I don't have the issue" those that do have the issue call us Apologists. I'm happy with my iPhone 4. It works beautifully, no matter how I hold it. My family members who have iPhone 4 also cannot replicate the issue. We all tried! My colleagues who have iPhone 4 have all tried as well. Guess what? None of us have the issue. I have had a couple of magical and easy to run facetime sessions talking about it. We live in a range of coverage areas, some good, some bad. So the issue may not be as easy for Apple to identify. Would it be a surprise if it was a production issue? Not really.
Any kind of global recall won't happen. Why? Because the issue doesn't affect the globally deployed product.
Let's wait and see what Apple say.
I am not an apologist... Just stating how it is with me and the 10 iPhone 4 owners I know.
Sent from my brilliant, unaffected iPhone 4. Magical.
Do you really think that it's just not signal strength in your area that is helping you out? I'm in a similar situation where I work and live in areas with great signal strength. However, your anecdotal evidence versus the testing and thoughts of Anandtech, Consumer Reports and Antennasys don't exactly carry the same weight in my opinion.
OK, let's get something straight....
This has absolutely nothing to do with frickin' software.
Any first-year electrical engineering student can tell you that if a person grasps an electrically-charged antenna capacitance will result. Translated to English...if you grab an antenna, the signal drops.
Period. No question. It's simple.
$1,000,000 bet says that somewhere in the design process, there was a cover for that "cool" antenna that Jobs opined about during the intro, but it was cut for cost reasons. That cover could have been a simple coating (as we saw for years on the metal antennas of CDMA phones) or something as elaborate as a bumper.
This bloody phone is defective in design. Apple, for once you demand for coolness and low cost of production have jumped up and bitten you.
Recall it. Now.
Yeah, it might be heading to that point.This problem is likely overblown; however, it's gotten to the point that the perception is more important than the reality anyway. Apple is going to have to fix this now, there is too much negative momentum. All I know if my Apple stock is getting hammered the last couple days and it's entirely because of this stupid antenna issue. Using some of that $40B+ to recall these phones and fix it will hurt them a lot less than the PR hit they'll take if they let this drag on, especially into the holiday season.
Actually, you can put out a mediocre product and still be profitable, as long as you market the product to the right audience.No, the primary responsibility of Apple is to make great products. Without those first and foremost you would have no chance of affecting stock for shareholders.
Surely you appreciate that first and foremost a company must be successful, and to do this the primary focus is on making great products for people.
If the products are good then people buy them and THEN stock is affected.