The MacBook Pro Retina will include the Iris Pro 5200 graphics which will ship in Q3 2013. It has been launched but won't be available till then, according to Intels website.
Secondly, the low display yield rates indicate Apple is going to switch to IGZO panels in the upcoming refresh. The production of these panels just startet, therefore the supply is not really high enough for a new rMBP just yet.
Combining the new display tech and the new Haswell chips, Apple will be able to reduce the power requirements and the heat substantially, resulting in the ability to make the body of the machine even slimmer.
the Retina MacBook Pro would ship later due to production bottlenecks on the advanced displays.
Longer battery life and dual microphones... are you kidding me? If this is the highligh of the hardware update, it is pathetic.
As mentioned above, Apple has to wait for certain components becoming available. The additional waiting time will result in a substantially better product.
That the three other SKUs belong to Airport products has been mentioned by me two days ago.
Not really. They just updated them three months ago...
No screen updates for the MBAs make it look like Apple has lost the leading edge in the ultraportable market.
Longer battery life and dual microphones... are you kidding me? If this is the highligh of the hardware update, it is pathetic.
Let them know periodically that there is a market. They're money driven.
Until they offer the ability to run legacy software they won't get my upgrade dollars ....
Why are they still having production bottlenecks a year after this product first launched? I've read some really damning online reviews of the MBP-R. This product seems to have one problem after the next. I sincerely hope they fix it as I'm itching to get the 15" model if they lower the price a bit.
Doesn't sound like we're going to get a retina screen on the updated MBA which was the only reason I was looking to upgrade. Sugar.
At this rate I won't be buying any Mac products at all this year, unless the new Mac Pro is a real cracker.
Not really. They just updated them three months ago...
Pessimistic, aren't we?
An optimist would say, better battery life, dual microphones, faster chips, faster wifi. Good. Looking forward to what else comes next week.
Too many pessimists on this board.
The only reason for production bottlenecks on the retina screens would be if they're switching manufacturers and/or screen technologies.
The likely candidate would be to switch to Sharp's new IGZO displays which allow high pixel densities without as much power draw.
Are you quoting something? Source?
I suspected the IGZO panel myself with the rumor of the display production bottlenecks, but I'm not sure why they'd opt for the Iris Pro when the 15 ships with discrete graphics. Maybe they're waiting on the Iris Pro for the 13 and just holding the release of the 15 so they can release them simultaneously?
They would have to go with the Iris Pro because the IGZO panels have even more pixels, therefore need substantially more GPU power. That includes the integrated GPU which is also being used for saving battery life.
IGZO not available in quantity, Iris Pro not available: No launch at WWDC. It's as easy as that.
Would they adopt IGZO displays? I don't think there's a source for these news... not even the iPhone has adopted IGZO displays yet.
The Sammy screen is superior. With their shaky relationship, I'm not sure Apple can just be like "make us more, hurry up"
It says that the displays are not available in suitable amounts. Which is very strange considering Apple has had a lot of time to manufacture a lot of displays.
There is your IGZO rumor!
-> http://9to5mac.com/2013/05/16/sharp...ould-end-up-in-next-round-of-retina-macbooks/
I've seen the news. But nothing connects these news to MacBooks, except for mere speculations.
The screens all follow a 16:9 ratio, and not the 16:10 used on MacBooks. They wouldn't be suitable for the current form factor, which has been released last year and won't receive an update in the following years. Apple won't use these particular screens on the MacBook Pro.
Pessimistic, aren't we?
An optimist would say, better battery life, dual microphones, faster chips, faster wifi. Good. Looking forward to what else comes next week.
Too many pessimists on this board.
There are in fact rumors by KGI (very reliable!) of an impending redesign of the Retina MacBook Pros which could include the 16:9 form factor!
The power savings are substantial and hard to ignore by Apple.
Thing is Samsung just invested a shed load of money in Sharp to keep them going so even if we get Sharp screens Samsung will still benefit in the long run.
I know this won't be a popular thing to say but you have to wonder whether or not this whole Apple versus Samsung legal battle is worth it. It seems like every week Apple wins somewhere and then the next week Samsung wins somewhere. I've lost track as to who is winning this battle now. In the end I suspect that neither side will deliver a knockout blow and the only winners will be lawyers who must be raking it in. Frankly I don't care who is right and who is wrong, I just want the best possible components in the Apple products I pay good money for.
I've not seen rumors of a redesigned retina MacBook Pro. I've seen Kuo, from KGI, predicting that the 13" rMBPs could get slightly thinner, but that's just probably to match the thinness of the 15" rMBP (the current 13" rMBP is .75" thick, while the 15" rMBP is .71"). I've not seen any other predictions. Which are they?
They would have to go with the Iris Pro because the IGZO panels have even more pixels, therefore need substantially more GPU power. That includes the integrated GPU which is also being used for saving battery life.
IGZO not available in quantity, Iris Pro not available: No launch at WWDC. It's as easy as that.