Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I don’t know whether to laugh at the fact that such a large portion of the MacRumor’s community still hates Jern for no apparent reason, or cry at the fact that he’s become completely absorbed in his Apple leaks to the point that he’s forgotten about Front Page Tech. It used to be a tech news show that covered everything in tech; now it’s just a bi-monthly conglomeration of his Apple leaks.

He's been more accurate recently than not but has a personality that is hard to defend...
 
Did he tweet this from his brand new iPad Apple released this past Tuesday?? I’m waiting for him to tweet a blurry elevator picture of the PowerBook G5..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rafterman
Is he talking about the watch that was supposed to be announced this past Tuesday, according to Prosser's "sources." Can we cut the crap with this clown already?
 
  • Like
Reactions: EM2013
This makes me think they are separating based on the materials too. So the "Pro" will have the higher end material options and the "SE" will have just aluminium.

That's a possibility, but I don't like it.
If the "SE" comes without ECG or other sensor, it means you have to buy the Pro to get the best model. But if the Pro only comes in stainless steel and other premium materials, it starts at a much higher price point.
Many customers, including me, are just fine with the sport model in aluminium, but expect to have the full set of features.

The SE makes sense to replace the series 3, but the rest of the lineup should remain the same. If they want to have a Pro model, that's ok, as long as it only have a nicer/stronger material
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
How about something even more obvious: rather than a 'based on' Series 4, surely isn't it more likely that the Series 4 will become the new low-priced watch. Period.

Excerpt from keynote transcript "... and that's Apple Watch Series 6. Available in store on <date> for $<similar to the S5>. Meanwhile Apple Watch Series 4 is now available for $<low price, similar to the S3>"
 
I think the S3 design is dead.

The S4 will be the low end model with no AOD starting at $199 USD

The S6 will have a few extra features notably o2 sensor and a slightly smaller bezel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dca100
Doesn't leave that much compared to the Series 3 it's replacing.

Bigger screen, faster CPU, maybe fall detection and international emergency calling, maybe haptic feedback on the crown, maybe compass, maybe Bluetooth 5.0 instead of 4.2.

They'll probably price it at $199 and… frankly, that's fine, but also not much of a noteworthy upgrade from the current $199 Series 3.
[automerge]1599836589[/automerge]


Well, most use it as a fitness tracker, and you can get a decent one for $50. So, even a $199 Watch is already quite a premium device.
S3 to S4 speed improvements were massive, that's more than enough reason and that's not even mentioning the screen size which is huge. I don't know what he is even talking about with "M9" chip though, since that's a motion coprocessor from 3 years ago, not a watch SoC. God I hate Prosser.
 
so aside from features like the ECG app and an always-on display, was the 4th gen very different from the current model? sorry, know very little about the  watch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
Madness? Actually, the non-pro Apple products are really good, and the pro versions offer extra for those who want it. It’s a good system.

I’m guessing the “madness” being referred to is specifically just this “Pro” moniker Apple is using.

I mean, I get it - it’s becoming a consistent way to differentiate levels of their product lines... But you have to admit - when you read it, the idea of a “pro” phone (much less a “pro” watch) is nonsensical. I don’t have a better suggestion for them that wouldn’t sound equally dumb (ultra? extreme?) so I guess it is what is.
 
This makes a lot of sense, however it also makes no sense.

Anyone who has used the 4 can immediately see how the design is better than the 3. So that’s a huge upgrade. But really what differentiates the 4 from the 5 or even the 6? 7? Another health monitor that 90% of wearers won’t use? How are they going to sell any Pros?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
Code names in a leak huh? Seems like Apple seeding information that is slightly different, to different people internally, to compare against public leaks, to find out who the leaker is. Surprised Prosser would include something like this, seems amateurish.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
Oh well, Prosser strikes again...

To be honest, I’m really interested in two features: sleep tracking and blood oxigen saturation, and I suspect only the unreleased Apple Watch 6 will feature a pO2 sensor. I think I could get a good sleep tracking with a Series 4.

It's the battery life that makes sleep tracking so maddening. My FitBit Versa could go days on a charge (but sucked as a smart watch excelled as a fitness tracker). I'm hoping native support for sleep tracking helps. I find my 5 drains if I use a sleep tracking app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Populus
Lmao this whole thing seems like a massive troll move, or Apple is weeding out leakers. None of this makes sense. Old ass co-processor and “pro” moniker? Hmmm...

can’t wait for the spin on this when he’s wrong.

Nah~ This "leaker" won't admit it, his arrogance won't allow him to do that. Thus this guy has no integrity and nor backbone to put it in his own words. lol

PS: I'm just commenting to see how people roast this guy that has no ethics to begin with hehe.
 
Eliminating S3 form factor makes sense as it streamlines manufacturing and assembly lines. Tech specs, we’ll find out next week.
Names? If there is going to be a “Pro” watch, it better be pro as in eg water resistant for diving...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
Doesn't leave that much compared to the Series 3 it's replacing.

Bigger screen, faster CPU, maybe fall detection and international emergency calling, maybe haptic feedback on the crown, maybe compass, maybe Bluetooth 5.0 instead of 4.2.

"faster CPU" probably isn't as big of an issue as future capable CPU. The S3 in the Series 3 is 32-bit ( if I recall correct). Apple has killed off 32-bit ARM code just about everywhere. At this point in time the Series 3 is very likely a 'dead end" once Watch OS 7 ships.

It would not be very surprising if all of the Watches switched to having the exact same processor. That would give Apple more volume and uniformity of hardware target to write towards. And then differentiate the watches on "advanced sensors" like EEG, temperature , etc. ( maybe sleep) as well as "fancy case material". They could sell "old S5 " chips in the new lower priced model, but it really probably isn't about "horsepower" for the processor.

S5 is on the "Tempest" small cores of the A12. If Apple moved to Lightening ( from A13) pretty good chance close to the "overkill" zone as far as what is needed for such as small screen and almost exclusively "one at a time" apps.


The second generation optical sensor is probably makes a substantive difference. (more accu
rately measuring blood oxygen levels probably needs at least needs that sensor. )



They'll probably price it at $199 and… frankly, that's fine, but also not much of a noteworthy upgrade from the current $199 Series 3.

Being able to keep up with Watch 8 (and up) is going to be noteworthy going forward. At some point Apple is going to break out the Watch from being so hard tethered to the iPhone if they want better growth objectives s with the product.



Well, most use it as a fitness tracker, and you can get a decent one for $50. So, even a $199 Watch is already quite a premium device.

Apple is moving the watch beyond "fitness" and more into general health. Even if don't do workouts ( although that is more healthy) , your sleep , falling (or not) , heart health are a broader set of outcomes.


Touchless payment has made a large uptick in covid triage response in a number of places.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Si Vis Pacem
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.