it would kill both the nano and iphone. plus why do we need so many cameras?
I could take or leave the camera but that's like saying why even have an iPod when your iPhone/iPad/Macbook can all play music portably or vise versa.
it would kill both the nano and iphone. plus why do we need so many cameras?
why put a camera in what is clearly a "gaming" device?![]()
just fire everyone!
start all over!
and background check everyone!![]()
And then they'll claim they'll run their background checks the best.
All these alleged prototypes (in their final stages) are getting a bit tiresome. I wouldn't be surprised if the next iPhone and iPod Touch looked quite different from these "teasers" that we're seeing.
The same photos came out when the 3rd gen was about to release. Complete crap.![]()
I'm not going to buy an iPhone simply so I can have a camera. What is going to make me buy an iPhone is the fact that I want a cell phone, which I still don't own and don't want.
And I'd much rather have an iPod Touch than a Nano, camera or not, which is why I have one. And I want a camera because the only camera I have is not something I can stick in my pocket. I carry around my iPod Touch with me and would love to be able to take pictures with it. WHy is this so hard to understand?
I don't understand how these devices get past apple security...![]()
Why not simplify the line by making the iPod Touch the same model as the iPhone but without cellular components? Why should the iPod Touch be a less capable device?
so many more people would buy a iphone if there wasnt a ipod touch to begin with.
And you just showed your lack of intellect ... ... the DA in two cities are looking at filing charges because a crime was committed.
iPod Touch total cost of ownership, forever: $299 + a few $10 software upgrades.
iPhone average plan total costs, 24 months: $2,839.
I don't think Apple has to worry about iPod touches cannibalizing iPhones. Are there some people who would buy an iPhone if the touch did not exist? Sure. But the cost for the iPhone is so much greater, that if the touch did not exist, most would not jump for the iPhone.
Two words: controlled leaks
The only surprise here is that it showed up on ebay, though, after last week maybe not.
Guess they wanted to wait for OS4.
Assuming they are real, these images seem to represent last year's prototype models of the currently shipping iPod touch, and not any future model.
the ipod touch should NOT have a camera.
I am going to get a 64 gig Touch to go with the 16gig 2G I presently have. But if there is going to be a new model I am going to wait. Instead of the metal back cover the present Touch has I would love it to have the ceramic one the iPhone 4G is apparently going to have. I also like the metal buttons the iPhone 4G has. I wonder if the Touch is going to follow the iPhone 4G with such a case.