Well, this comment turns it into a semantic discussion.How is it not Apple when it's clearly made by Apple?
From a legal standpoint, yes, it is Apple's property.
From a sales and marketing standpoint, it is not really "Apple" as in a real Apple product that the company stands behind from an engineering, marketing, sales, and support perspective. Of the hundreds of prototypes that may exist at any given time in Apple's labs, only a few are given the approval to be sold.
It's Apple property, but it's not Apple enough to have its own web page at www.apple.com and come in a nice box with the Apple logo.
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 Can't wait for Tim "Commu-apple-" Cookster to send police to get this down. Only Apple would do this, in fear of losing potential buyers of their current devices. Not Samsung, not Asus, no one would do this but the Communist-Manifesto Freaks known as Apple. Sorry this is just a vent, angers me how this collective group of abusers can get away with this
Can't wait for Tim "Commu-apple-" Cookster to send police to get this down. Only Apple would do this, in fear of losing potential buyers of their current devices. Not Samsung, not Asus, no one would do this but the Communist-Manifesto Freaks known as Apple. Sorry this is just a vent, angers me how this collective group of abusers can get away with this  
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		