In my experience on staff I never looked at or gave a **** about who (left or right) made a report. Most of the time when I handled a report from PRSI I let out a sigh and thought to myself, ****, another PRSI report?
Here's the thing that I did notice and found especially true when it came to PRSI reports. Many (from both sides), but not all, PRSI users like to instigate others and push the limits of the rules and find unique ways of skating under them yet still making a trollish or insulting post. Then, when the other person sees it, gets pissed off and reports it or responds in kind and steps over the line and gets moderated. A win for the other person who slipped a trollish comment under the rules and got away with it.
There is an awful lot of arguing by proxy that goes on in PRSI. There are some of you (not necessarily you two I quoted here) who absolutely love to argue and use the moderators to fight their battles via moderation and suspensions. They poke the bear and then run and hide behind a rock and tell someone in a tank when the bear comes attacking for being poked and then the person in the tank has to blow the bear away.
It's very difficult for the staff to moderate consistently and effectively applying the rules fairly when so many people ride the fine line trying to get away with their poor behavior.
Frankly, its ****ing annoying as hell and no matter what the moderator does in a lot of these situations, they're the bad guys because either they took action and one side gets mad for it, or they choose to take no action and the other side gets pissed because the post(s) remain.
Many, again not all, of PRSI users really make life hard for the staff and their political opponents.