invisiblecube
macrumors member
I still love Aperture, and will use it as long as I can. Maybe even if it means being stuck on an outdated version of OS X in the future.
I still love Aperture, and will use it as long as I can. Maybe even if it means being stuck on an outdated version of OS X in the future.
Photos is a great replacement for iPhoto, sure it demands a new paradigm for organising albums, but once you get you head around it, it works.
I am with you on the missing features. There is a map view in Colkections but you must still know the year in which the photo was taken.The problem is, it's in many ways inferior to iPhoto. In my opinion:
Photos:
+Better performance
+Better editing tools
+Extensions (although clumsy)
iPhoto:
+Map view
+Hold shift to see unedited picutre (or was it alt?)
+Gesture to rotate pictures
+More slideshows which are more customizable
+E-mail picture cards
+Stars
+Slightly better batch editing tools
Some of the stuff I mentioned was just gimmick (although fun from time to time). Other stuff was very useful (rotation gesture, shift to view unedited picture). All in all, it wouldn't take much effort to implement all this stuff in Photos. Since Apple didn't bother, I guess they don't care. I believe that new software should be at least on par with the old one. If it's partly better and partly worse, why even switch?
PS.: Just a tip - if you install Affinity, Photos extensions work even after trial period expires.
The problem is, it's in many ways inferior to iPhoto. In my opinion:
Photos:
+Better performance
+Better editing tools
+Extensions (although clumsy)
iPhoto:
+Map view
+Hold shift to see unedited picutre (or was it alt?)
+Gesture to rotate pictures
+More slideshows which are more customizable
+E-mail picture cards
+Stars
+Slightly better batch editing tools
Some of the stuff I mentioned was just gimmick (although fun from time to time). Other stuff was very useful (rotation gesture, shift to view unedited picture). All in all, it wouldn't take much effort to implement all this stuff in Photos. Since Apple didn't bother, I guess they don't care. I believe that new software should be at least on par with the old one. If it's partly better and partly worse, why even switch?
PS.: Just a tip - if you install Affinity, Photos extensions work even after trial period expires.
I miss the old iTunes where it would play psychedelic graphics on the screen of your computer that responded to the beats of the song you were playing. That was so cool, and made a nice background as the music played.
[doublepost=1458191834][/doublepost]Or, you could go to the File menu and select "create calendar," "create card," "create book," "order prints."![]()
Just "up"grade to Photos man, you don't need all those confusing features found in Aperture!Boy, this seriously sucks! Aperture had one of the best photo book editors. Possible to use templates and at the same time being able to move everything around freely. It could have used an update here and there but it was still better than any other software and a lot less work than completely doing it from scratch in Photoshop or InDesign…
So now I can still use its editor but not buy the book in the end anymore. Is it possible to export the books as PDF and print them somewhere else?
Would it really kill Apple to keep this damn web server script running to receive a PDF and payment data from Aperture?!
So now I can still use its editor but not buy the book in the end anymore. Is it possible to export the books as PDF and print them somewhere else?
Would it really kill Apple to keep this damn web server script running to receive a PDF and payment data from Aperture?!
It still does that! But the options are more limited (of course).I miss the old iTunes where it would play psychedelic graphics on the screen of your computer that responded to the beats of the song you were playing. That was so cool, and made a nice background as the music played.
I think it's the 'M' key now (to view original version).
Don't get how you could miss that. The '+' is universally used to add or create something. Pretty simple to me.Yeah, like I said, knowing it exists made me search for it harder. I had assumed it had all been removed in the Great Simplifications.
I was literally not aware this stuff made it into Photos, despite looking. It's in none of the menus. I went to vistaprint last week to get prints made.
It turns out, I was supposed to hit the "+" button on photos, which I assumed meant "add to album" or some other dingbat feature. How is "+" meant to convey "Create a Photo Album project". I never would have clicked that had this article not informed me that the feature was, indeed, still in Photos somewhere. I should have spent a few more minutes looking around. I guess I prefer the obviousness of iPhoto.
Discoverability does not mean "keep clicking buttons to see what they do".
The new Photos cannot make a map to show destinations like iPhotos could. This is disgrace.
iPhoto and Aperture were discontinued in the spring of 2015 when Photos for OS X launched as part of OS X Yosemite 10.10.3, but the software continues to be used by many Mac owners who previously had it installed on their machines.
Though Aperture and iPhoto are not available in the Mac App Store and are no longer being updated, the software has remained functional with OS X Yosemite and OS X El Capitan. As of March 31, however, one feature will be disappearing -- the ability to order photo books, prints, and other content created within the two apps. Starting on that date, the Apple Print Products Store will no longer support Aperture or iPhoto.
![]()
As noted by a MacRumors tipster and the Apple Support forums, iPhoto and Aperture are now notifying customers who order books or prints about the imminent discontinuation of the feature. Apple employees have also been letting customers know that the printing ability will no longer be available, but Apple doesn't appear to have made an official support document announcing the change.
Photo books, cards, calendars, prints, and more can be created using the Photos for OS X app, which replaced both Aperture and iPhoto.
(Thanks, Mark!)
Article Link: PSA: Apple Print Products Store Dropping Support for iPhoto and Aperture on March 31
Need to check, if that's possible it's 1 step. Then I still need to find a good printing service for books that either directly accepts my PDF from Aperture or find some easy workflow to get it work with other photo book apps. But the ones I know and tried out so far made me want to throw myself out of the window…I am not sure about Aperture but in iPhoto exporting to PDF is an option. I do this to get a copy of my photo book on an iPad so I can show it when I do not have the actual book with me.
Welcome to Lightroom.
I'm sorry that you hated it. I'm not sure what you're using..but i'm fine with mine.Welcome indeed. I am paying for Lightroom now and I hate it. So slow, so complicated to use and so damned ugly. Ugh.