Palm has the advantage of employing actual engineers, some of which used to work for Apple.
And how do we know that Prystar doesn't employ some disgruntled former Apple engineers?
Palm has the advantage of employing actual engineers, some of which used to work for Apple.
How about we at least stick to only counting people whose annual income is above the price of a Mac!And who live in a country where Macs are sold.
*sigh*
Just die Psystar. Die. Apple can kill them can't they? How hard can this be?![]()
And how do we know that Prystar doesn't employ some disgruntled former Apple engineers?![]()
There is one enormous difference between Palm and Psystar. To see the difference, you have to read the license for the iTunes application, and the license for using the iTunes Music Store, just to be sure, and the license for MacOS X. Palm doesn't make any copies of iTunes, and the license for iTunes doesn't seem to mention anything that would make it illegal in the first place to use iTunes with a Palm Pre (it seems to me it might have been illegal to install music with DRM bought from the Apple Store on a Palm Pre, but first, it doesn't work anyway, and second, it doesn't matter much anymore. But the MacOS X license clearly says that copying MacOS X is illegal.
Strangely enough, the definition of a desktop doesn't stretch to it being upgradeable, or it being separate from its monitor. The iMac is a desktop, in every sense of the word. It is a personal computer, it sits on your desk.and no, the imac is not a desktop in any form of the word
no doubt they do. whats your point?
Strangely enough, the definition of a desktop doesn't stretch to it being upgradeable, or it being separate from its monitor. The iMac is a desktop, in every sense of the word. It is a personal computer, it sits on your desk.
Only one FW400 port as standard? Fail.
Seriously though, hooray for competition!
um wrong. there is no such chip
You might want to take a look at number one again.1. Apple makes high end desktop.
2. People want it on cheaper hardware.
3. Mom and Pop shop builds cheap hardware and pre-hacks it to run OS X
4. Mom and Pop shop goes Chapter 11
5. Mom and Pop shop re-opens with high end hardware pre-hacked to run OS X
What is the point when you can just go back to step one and have better hardware anyway????
That chip and its exact function are actually quite well documented by Amit Singh, who I believe is today the manager for MacOS X development at Google:
http://osxinternals.com/book/bonus/chapter7/tpmdrmmyth/
In the summer of 2006, when the Mac Pro was introduced, x86-based Macs stopped having onboard TPMs altogether.
Around the same time in 2006, I also wrote about kernel-level binary protection in Mac OS X. As that article explains, it is actually binary protection that ties Mac OS X to a specific class of hardware. The mechanism is partly implemented as a special-purpose virtual memory (VM) pager that is interposed between the kernel's higher layer and the vnode pager.
The sad reality is that your right. Its a great bargain for $1499.What do you mean "up there with macs"? Mac Pro starts at $2499. You can't compare it to an iMac. It's a Nehalem Xeon based system... it runs circles around iMac. Heck, it runs circles around 3-4 iMacs.
Again, the definition of a desktop does not specify in detail the components required. It sits on your desk, it's not portable, it has no battery, it can't be used on your lap. It's a desktop.it uses laptop components. so no, its not a desktop. its merely a mbp that isnt mobile
And how do we know that Prystar doesn't employ some disgruntled former Apple engineers?![]()
The sad reality is that your right. Its a great bargain for $1499.
As for discussion in regards to the "chip". I heard that Snow Leopard will utilize this type of feature, so that it can only be run on legitimate Macs, so goodbye to hackintosh, is this true?
Again, the definition of a desktop does not specify in detail the components required. It sits on your desk, it's not portable, it has no battery, it can't be used on your lap. It's a desktop.
did you even read your link......
kinda supports my statement saying there is no such chip..
i never said there wasnt such a chip in the past but currently there is no such chip and it certainly isnt what hackintoshes have to get around today
Since it is unlikely that Psystar has suddenly become a reseller for Apple Inc., could you try to give us any justification for your statement? I mean "really cheap" I could understand, as long as you exclude build quality and service and forget about that zero percent probability of getting warranty repairs, but "really good" and "open"?Psystar sells really good open OSX computers.
I don't think anyone who is good enough in his profession to have been an Apple employee at some point in time would start with no-hopers like Psystar. Revenge is a weak motive; a paycheck every month is much stronger.
And it's not as if there are any secrets needed that only Apple employees would know to get MacOS X running on a non-Apple computer. You need some decent engineering, which people in the Hackintosh community have done, that is all.
I read the link. You only read the first few lines. To quote the article: "The key (actually, a pair of 32-byte values) comes from the System Management Controller (SMC). Unlike in the case of a TPM, accessing this key involves no cryptography, no random numbers, no hardware security—it's merely obfuscation. Just as you can use I/O Kit interfaces to retrieve motion sensor data and numerous other readings from the SMC, you can retrieve the key—no number crunching involved. You don't even need superuser privileges. In fact, assuming you know how to access hardware from user-space, a program to do this would be quite straightforward to write on Mac OS X—perhaps around 50 lines of C. "
Yes, there is a chip in each modern Apple Macintosh containing a 64 bit key that is needed to make some parts of the operating system work. It is not particularly well hidden; not hidden enough to keep any hacker from copying it, but hidden enough to make that a DMCA violation.
In the summer of 2006, when the Mac Pro was introduced, x86-based Macs stopped having onboard TPMs altogether.
"The key (actually, a pair of 32-byte values) comes from the System Management Controller (SMC). Unlike in the case of a TPM, accessing this key involves no cryptography, no random numbers, no hardware security—it's merely obfuscation."
Yes, there is a chip in each modern Apple Macintosh containing a 64 bit key that is needed to make some parts of the operating system work. It is not particularly well hidden; not hidden enough to keep any hacker from copying it, but hidden enough to make that a DMCA violation.
Hmm, Psystar comes with a 3-year warranty...but who's to say they'll be around that long to honor it?![]()