I hope Apple have used the Strap area for the battery... gonna be a pain to charge this thing every day.
I hope not, I would want to be able to change the watch band.
I hope Apple have used the Strap area for the battery... gonna be a pain to charge this thing every day.
I understand the sentiment that we don't want to charge a watch-like device daily, but I don't see it as a major blocker. I have to charge my iPhone every night, but have not yet thrown it out in frustration.
Assuming that the wearable does have wireless charging, at least we won't have to plug it in. Just take it off and drop it on the dock/mat before bed.
BCM = Battery Charging Module
P2B = Person To ?
EVT= Extra ? ?
It seems odd to have a perfectly circular sensor in a rectangular housing. Why go through the engineering process of designing circular sensors to house in a rectangular form? Doesn't make a lot of sense at the moment.
No I hate the fact that everyone gets hard ons over it just because the display is round.
It's not a watch - it's an ultra low-powered group of sensors and a microtransmitter that affixes to the underside of *any* watch. Apple doesn't want to sell you one of them - they want to sell you one for every watch you might have (sport, fashion, luxury, etc.).
Why complete in a market with broad consumer tastes and needs when you can use the existing market to deliver your product? The Android kids have no idea what they are doing.
I think people just get hardons because Motorola got the fashion part down. Being round is a big part of it. You really gotta see the watch in person to appreciate it.
This is the second smartwatch I've owned, I've played around with Google Glass and I also own a Narrative Clip. At this point I'm convinced when it comes to wearables, if a company doesn't totally nail the style part, it's never gonna take off.
Except that entirely kills the idea of using it from sleep tracking and/or a vibrating alarm clock.
Agreed. The style part if everything with a wearable like a smartwatch. If it isn't fashionable people just don't going to wear it. In that regard a smartwatch isn't any different from a regular watch.I think people just get hardons because Motorola got the fashion part down. Being round is a big part of it. You really gotta see the watch in person to appreciate it.
This is the second smartwatch I've owned, I've played around with Google Glass and I also own a Narrative Clip. At this point I'm convinced when it comes to wearables, if a company doesn't totally nail the style part, it's never gonna take off.
Broadcom have a wireless charging unit called BCM59350.
Don't forget "anonymous reddit post". That's legitimacy right there!
It's not a watch - it's an ultra low-powered group of sensors and a microtransmitter that affixes to the underside of *any* watch. Apple doesn't want to sell you one of them - they want to sell you one for every watch you might have (sport, fashion, luxury, etc.).
Why complete in a market with broad consumer tastes and needs when you can use the existing market to deliver your product? The Android kids have no idea what they are doing.
How can anyone get a good indication of the final product from these alleged drawings?![]()
A big part of the decision process to buy or not, for me at least, is the look of the "watch". I am not in Geek mode 24/7 so personally I would prefer something to look like a nicely styled watch. Something I would wear out to dinner with the wife, or to gatherings with friends and not look like I have an iPod strapped to my wrist.
I am confident Apple will design a nice watch whether it's round OR square... but I would prefer it look like a watch, not a "gadget".
That business model fits Samsung very well.
I really hope apply just copies the Moto 360 but with a full round screen (no notch at the bottom like the moto) Touch ID screen with retina resolution screen, 2 day battery life.
Which ever one Apple was allowed to patent.So is it circular or rectangular?
If it's going to be square-ish it definitely won't beat Motorola's smartwatch.