Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is only possible if the rectangular part is the clip. However, I think it is much more likely that the coil fits inside the circular hole in the base of the rectangular part, as everyone else has assumed. Those lines are just part of the moulding that holds the circle in place.

Maybe, but if you look at the BCM coil image, there's rectangles at the top and bottom of the circle. Looks like a classic watch design.
 
10 years ago you would be right, but there has been a trend to bigger watches since then and men seem to prefer chunkier day to day watches. I would say that most men gravitate towards 44-46mm watches these days.

You still need the stature and physique to pull off anything over 44mm.
My analogy still stands.

Your typical nerd:
100_8696.jpg


next to this guy wearing a 40mm.
601085-smallsean-connery-jpg_1313122.jpg


Your standard 40mm
87a.jpg



47mm Panerai. Slightly bigger than the 360. Stallone and Statham can pull that off. Not many men can.

Sylvester-Stallone-Panerai.jpg
 
You still need the stature and physique to pull off anything over 44mm.
My analogy still stands.

Your typical nerd:
Image

next to this guy wearing a 40mm.
Image

Your standard 40mm
Image


47mm Panerai. Slightly bigger than the 360. Stallone and Statham can pull that off. Not many men can.

Image

Thank you for real factually based commentary on this.
 
Oh my I can see why Switzerland should worry.

Edit: seriously has anyone heard from Switzerland today? Can anyone go over and check on them?
 
Maybe he was talking about your DIRECT quote saying the Moto is fashionable largely because of its round shape...
WTF are YOU talking about??????

I said the watch is fashionable and the round shape is a big part of that. I didn't say all watches have to be round to be fashionable.

Motorola puts out a round watch, suddenly half of MR develops an irrational hatred for circles
 
I see your typical nerd and raise you a uber nerd.

Ikepod Megapode 47mm
 

Attachments

  • jonathan_ive.jpg
    jonathan_ive.jpg
    54.7 KB · Views: 160
It's not going to be round...

Let's think about this for a minute: a round watch makes sense (and looks really good) when the "application" is a clock. The classic 30 degree indicators of hours, the sweep second hand, all that good clock stuff. But for the Apple wearable, "clock" is just going to be an app, so the container holding the UI will have to be more flexible. And the circle is not a flexible enough app display container. In the same way that the classic Ma Bell rotary phone might be the perfect manifestation of the telephone, it wouldn't make sense to try to jam a UI to check email on an old rotary phone. The iPhone has a Phone app, and the wearable will have a clock app. But there's no way it makes sense for it to be round. The Moto 360 does look nifty when running it's clock app, but I think anything displaying a lot of text is going to result in a bunch of wasted display space or truncated like the Google one.... Just my random thought of the day....
 
Maybe, but if you look at the BCM coil image, there's rectangles at the top and bottom of the circle. Looks like a classic watch design.

Have you seen the 3D angle shot of the round part? It makes it look too thin to be the face. It looks more like an internal component. Especially when you compare it to the chunky rounded rectangle part with the angled cutouts on the sides for the strap.
 
I posted just yesterday in the other iWatch thread that I'd be shocked if this wasn't waterproof for at least 10 meters. Pretty cool :p You can't have health kit and all that stuff without it being waterproof.

Yup. Also, remember that iPod was not the first music player. Although it had innovative features and user interface, it was expensive, had modest feature list and many people predicted it would fail in the market place. I don't know whether the iWatch will have that kind of reception, but I'm not ready to bet against the iWatch quite yet... especially after having never seen the thing...

Looking forward to seeing what Apple's been up to with this thing. They have apparently been working on it for quite some time.. unlike Samsung's watches which seem to sprout like crabgrass...

Also, I wonder if the seemingly slow development of Siri has been caused by it's tie to the iWatch.

Regarding the form factor... oh, My... Its a rectangle... the horror! Some of the fantasy/fantastic expectations of this device remind me of the days leading up to the introduction of the Segway.... there were people seriously expecting that it was a real live, honest to gosh HOVERBOARD. Never mind the physics....
 
I still don't get it

I still need to lug around a phone

I still need to remember the phone and, unless its battery is umpteen times the most optimistic estimates, will now need to remember to take my 'watch' with me too every morning (cos it'll no longer be near permanently attached to my wrist like my current one is).

Then, regardless of how long a battery the 'watch' has, I'm still only getting the all 'singing all dancing experience' for as long as my phone that it's paired to has juice.

After that all I can do is use it to tell the time and thus work out how long it'll be before I get home to charge the ***** phone back up..
 
If there is no circular version they seriously missed a trick. Esp. If they are going for the 'luxury' market
 
I'm starting think they are going to reveal several types & styles of watches/bands/wearables tomorrow (not just men/women sizes). I thinking there might be a fitness-related one, a fashion/luxury-related one, and maybe a medical-related one. I think they might unveil a whole line of wearables rather than a one-watch-to-rule-them-all "iWatch".
 
Genuinely looking forward to tomorrow, not because i'll be automatically buying the iWatch, but because apple need to sell it to me. I'm sure i'm like most people in seeing a watch as being a very personal thing; the kind of watch you wear does make a statement about you; phones are in pockets most of the day, but a watch is right there for everyone to see (including you) 24-7. It has to be "just right" for that individual person. This i see as apples biggest challenge; making something that will fit most peoples taste. I'm really interested to see how they have tried to make something so personal, be more universal.
Personally i'd like to see a completely flexible, self-tightening band where everything is a screen so you can fully customise it; and even go old skool and emulate a strap with textures if you wanted to, but the chances of that are zero... If i wait another 50 years maybe.... ;)
 
I'm starting think they are going to reveal several types & styles of watches/bands/wearables tomorrow (not just men/women sizes). I thinking there might be a fitness-related one, a fashion/luxury-related one, and maybe a medical-related one. I think they might unveil a whole line of wearables rather than a one-watch-to-rule-them-all "iWatch".

Hope so. Called iWear perhaps
 
If it's rectangular and doesn't offer great battery life or isn't visually appealing, I might try going with an LG G3 and Moto 360 for a year. I've had iPhones for a years and I'm ready to try something different. Right now, the only thing that'll persuade me to stay with the iPhone 6 is the iWatch.
 
Does anyone think that Jony Ive, who wears watches that cost thousands of dollars, is going to try and copy the aesthetic of a high end watch for a device that's most likely going to sell for under $400? The Moto Almost 360 reminds me of those home improvement reality shows where the homeowners and a designer are given $1,000 to remodel their home and they try to make the $1,000 look like they spent $10,000. Apple's not going to make something that looks like a knock off of an expensive watch.
 
Does anyone think that Jony Ive, who wears watches that cost thousands of dollars, is going to try and copy the aesthetic of a high end watch for a device that's most likely going to sell for under $400? ... Apple's not going to make something that looks like a knock off of an expensive watch.

I agree. Whatever you might think of Ive, he does not have a tacky gene in his body. I think it will be very different, not a copy of anything currently in the market place.

And I could be completely wrong....:)
 
According to a Reddit user, the x207 is a machine that tests buttons at Apple. You're looking at designs for how to fit some iWatch components into a standardized housing that gets loaded into a machine which proceeds to press its buttons thousands of times, checking for effectiveness and component damage. If he's correct, this schematic has nothing to do with the finished iWatch product.

Source: http://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/2fsswb/iwatch_leak/ckchuo2
 
If the iWatch looks all techy and nerdy like the Galaxy Gear, and is priced anywhere close to $400, then: WILL. NOT. BUY.
 
Does anyone think that Jony Ive, who wears watches that cost thousands of dollars, is going to try and copy the aesthetic of a high end watch for a device that's most likely going to sell for under $400? The Moto Almost 360 reminds me of those home improvement reality shows where the homeowners and a designer are given $1,000 to remodel their home and they try to make the $1,000 look like they spent $10,000. Apple's not going to make something that looks like a knock off of an expensive watch.

Jony Ive will probably make the iWatch into a triangle

in the video he'll talk about visiting the great pyramids and explain that to reinvent the watch, Apple had to explore the beautiful simplicity of basic geometry
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.