Given my computer situation right now they would have to really mess it up or delay it for another year or 2 for me not to order on day 1.I'm going to say it: the day Apple updates the Mac mini, if that day comes, I'll order it on day one. Just for the sake of it.
traditional desktop computers are a declining and dying market. Buy an iPad Pro instead, you'll be delighted with your purchase, and it is the future of computing.
Even DNF eventually materialised:I like how the buyer's guide says "don't buy - updates soon" - I wish I had that kind of optimistic outlook on life![]()
The Mac MiniMin the only Apple computer that even slightly interests me and have had 5 of them starting with the late 2008 model and my last being the 2012. The 2014 mini was an abomination on so many fronts and the biggest reason I have almost completely left the Apple ecosystem.
If apple releases a Mac mini which has user replaceable memory and storage, I might consider going back, but the chances of that happening are slim. The last Mac I bought easeas 2012 MBA since then I have purchased 5 windows PC's for myself and the family.
Even DNF eventually materialised:
https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Duke_Nukem_Forever
We'll either get a Mac Mini at some point, or we'll get a new vapourware meme.
Actually; you could argue that the phrase "is an important part of our product lineup" is already a bit of a running joke.
You wait.Ugh, please don't compare anything to DNF. It's an awful game that would have been better off cancelled, far more enjoyable as a joke.
Even DNF eventually materialised:
https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/Duke_Nukem_Forever
We'll either get a Mac Mini at some point, or we'll get a new vapourware meme.
Actually; you could argue that the phrase "is an important part of our product lineup" is already a bit of a running joke.
Just... no. iOS devices are all well and good for content consumption, but they still suck for productivity.
Ugh, please don't compare anything to DNF. It's an awful game that would have been better off cancelled, far more enjoyable as a joke.
I bought one last year. Makes a good picture frame, sketch pad, and paper weight. Not even good for surfing.Buy an iPad Pro instead, you'll be delighted with your purchase, and it is the future of computing.
Large-screen smartphones often satisfy the need for a convenient mobile device better than an iPad, and traditional laptop or desktop computers often satisfy the need for more demanding work (which can't be done on a smartphone) better than an iPad. iPads will always have their niche and can replace a laptop or desktop for some people, but they aren't the future of computing, and tablets in general already haven't taken off as well as some thought they would over the years.It's not surprising that Apple isn't very motivated to keep updating the low cost entry to Mac, when traditional desktop computers are a declining and dying market. Buy an iPad Pro instead, you'll be delighted with your purchase, and it is the future of computing.
Just... no. iOS devices are all well and good for content consumption, but they still suck for productivity.
But, keyboard case! iOS multitasking!
These are improvements, but they still feel awkward as hell. Sorry. Maybe you've gotten used to it, but plenty of us haven't and won't. The "Files" app is nice, but it's no Finder and you know it.
But... but, a touch-based interface is the "future of computing"!
How many years has that narrative been pushed? And still, when you look around people are typing on *gasp* laptops or even *double gasp* desktops (been in an office before?). Prop up your iPad with its weird little keyboard on your lap at the ONE angle it has. Now go poke around on the screen and enjoy the sensation of the whole thing tipping back. Be the guy who brings his awkward-ass setup to the coffee shop instead of just, you know, opening a laptop. I'm not even going to start on the quality of your keyboard.
Traditional computers are dying!
Have you been in an office at all ever? Try it and report back on what 95% of people have on their desks. People may well be augmenting their productivity (cough YouTube) with a tablet, but they've all got actual computers with actual keyboard because they work.
Sorry, nice try though.
I liked it. It is campy humor shooter. It is not suppose to replace your Call of Duty or any serious game.
I can see the Keynote slide now, "33% faster than the current Mac Mini!"
I really hope that Apple never adopts the A processor for the Mac. Having the x86 cpu has been a huge benefit for me. I remember all to well the isolation that came with using 68k and PPC processors.
Might bring down the prices of Macs too since I'm sure Intel is getting a nice profit margin on their processors.
apple being in control could mean an annual update cycle, better power management, maybe faster?
To be fair, I find the iPad is also a good recipe device (Paprika is an incredible recipe app) and we get a lot of milage out of ours as a music control/streaming device. You won't catch me trying to work on it, but it's nice for some things.I bought one last year. Makes a good picture frame, sketch pad, and paper weight. Not even good for surfing.
Yep. My NUC hangs on the wall and runs our security cam software. It was $950 with a super fast SSD and 32 gb RAM, i7, and integrated video card that runs just fine with my 40” 4k Samsung monitor. Been running almost a couple years now. Could have been a mac mini.Apple's lack of Mac Mini updates is entirely Apple's choice.
Intel released chips since 2014 (and 2012) that were suitable for the Mac Mini. But Apple didn't use them.
Even Intel themselves jumped into the tiny-desktop PC market. They produced dozens of NUC mini PCs in the time since the Mac Mini stopped being updated.
And literally every other computer manufacturer has been able to update their machines using chips from Intel.
So I'm not really seeing the "Apple needs to be in control of CPUs in order to make updated machines" argument.
The last (good) Mac Mini was available with a quad-core Intel i7-3720QM in 2012. (we'll forget the 2014 dual-core mistake for now)
Intel released various quad-core 45W processors like the i7-4720HQ, i7-5750HQ, i7-6700HQ and i7-7700HQ in the following years which would have been perfect for the Mac Mini.
But Apple didn't use them. Instead... the Mac Mini remained stagnant since 2014. (or some would say since 2012)
That was Apple's fault... not Intel's.
Its pathetic you have to spend $3-4k just to get a decent Mac, shame on apple, wish I could run on a windows pc instead which gives you all the options in the world