Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Absolute 💯 way to piss off every Mac Pro 2019 owner. Even as one of the first customers to order it, I didn’t receive it until feb 2020. So just over a year old and they are talking about another release. WOW what a way to get pros to spend 10k and then release an update so soon. SHOCKING. A way to basically make sure the nail is in the coffin.
Wait… you only wanted your machine on the condition that they never do a newer machine?
 
I can see a reason to keep Intel in these machines. Unless Apple have a processor up their sleeve that can shred this. I can see pros needing the ability to run x86 apps like Windows etc.
True x86 support would probably be the predominate reason. Apple may be able to best it with raw CPU performance but there may be other first-gen limitations like memory, ports, and gpu options. - Which gives more credibility to a smaller Mac Pro being in the works that may be a peace offering to those that want more than an Apple Silicon iMac while leaving the full size Intel Mac Pro for those that need it.
 
Last edited:
Any chance there could be a way to add an M1 to the Xeon Pro as a coprocessor? Or vice versa, really, where system tuns on M1 and Pro apps use the Intel cores and discrete graphics?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: MoJoRo
Wouldn't this mean that Apple WON'T be all Apple Silicon by 2022?
Not necessarily. I would think that if they do release an updated Intel Mac Pro, it'll come out later in 2021. The Apple Silicon Mac Pro would likely be announced at WWDC 2022 and released about 3 months later, around the same time the first M1 Macs came out 2 years prior. My guess.
 
You are not serious with this, right? Magic mouse was never discontinued and brought back.
Wrong example :)
One of your argument points is that it was seen as a "failure". If being seen as a failure was not a factor, you shouldn't have listed it as a supporting detail. And you didn't clarify what "doesn't work like that" means so there was nothing to go on.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Freida
Interesting in that the 2019 Mac Pro uses Cascade Lake-W, not Cascade Lake-SP.

Xeon-SP is designed for multiple-socket (2-8) applications so is Apple considering going toe-to-toe with the likes of Dell and HPE and offering 2/4/8 CPU Mac Pros for datacenter applications?

Could we see a bi-furcation of the product line where ASi Mac Pros are single-CPU models (with high core counts) and then Intel Mac Pros are multi-CPU models?

Another poster mentioned they had heard Apple was working on multi-CPU interconnections. I presumed they would be for connecting multiple ASi SoCs (perhaps for Jade2C / Jade4C), but maybe this is for multiple Intel Xeon-SP CPUs...

The W chips are based on the SP architecture. The 8,1 will feature Ice Lake-SP based Xeon-W chips such as the Xeon W-3335.

 
  • Like
Reactions: CWallace
It would’ve been great if they switched to AMD just before Apple Silicon just to rub it in. AMD is also kicking Intel right now.
 
If you take forum posts complaining as any measure every Apple product ever created is a failure.

I expect Apple use a slightly more realistic measure for what is or isn’t a failure.

I'd take professional reviews, friends opinions, 6 years of twitter complaints, and much more to formulate what I believe is seen as a failure (which is completely different to what Apple thinks is a failure).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: singhs.apps
They've done a two-different-CPUs setup before:

Yep, that is having 2 computers in 1 case (old Amigas did that to the point of having ISA slots only useable with such an addon). What was suggested here would be more like the PPC cards (again for the Amiga) with had an 68040/060 onboard. Needless to say PPC performance was crippled compared to what the chips could do on it's own and SW support was a total mess.
 
It must really suck right now if you're locked into using a Mac for a workstation, and can't go the Epyc/PC route. We're talking 2-3X the cost for a full build, ECC memory, pro motherboard and all.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Duane Martin
hot take: Apple will probably reuse the trash can mac pro design for the Apple Silicon chips because Apple Silicon solves the thermal issue which was the reason they gave for pivoting back to the tower design.
Nah, I think it will be more like the cube but a lot better looking. Imagine a precision machined aluminum block that is passively cooled by large internal radiators running the M2Z. Although I really have no freaking idea what they’re doing with GPUs. You’re not far off in thinking this thing probably won’t be very upgradable, which kinda does against the whole point of the current model. Maybe it’s taking the longest because they’re getting that part figured out?
 
It would’ve been great if they switched to AMD just before Apple Silicon just to rub it in. AMD is also kicking Intel right now.

Great and not great, they do not want to support multiple architectures. They are *all in* on in-house chips, for better or for worse.
 
Yep, that is having 2 computers in 1 case (old Amigas did that to the point of having ISA slots only useable with such an addon). What was suggested here would be more like the PPC cards (again for the Amiga) with had an 68040/060 onboard. Needless to say PPC performance was crippled compared to what the chips could do on it's own and SW support was a total mess.
I don't really see the difference. The DOS card setup did things like share RAM (which is probably hard to do now without a massive performance/latency hit) and video output. That would probably be about as close as you could get as running Intel macOS on a primarily ARM Mac.
 
Absolute 💯 way to piss off every Mac Pro 2019 owner. Even as one of the first customers to order it, I didn’t receive it until feb 2020. So just over a year old and they are talking about another release. WOW what a way to get pros to spend 10k and then release an update so soon. SHOCKING. A way to basically make sure the nail is in the coffin.
Mac pros used to have processor bumps almost every year. Nobody complained about that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: diandi
It would be sensible to keep the Intel Mac Pro running for a few generations. Big companies invested into the promise to make pro software on its release and users of these machines may not be able to dump their software in the blink of a eye. I also still rather doubt that Apple can take on dedicated AMD GPU's yet.

more like take on nvidia GPUs.
 
That would probably be about as close as you could get as running Intel macOS on a primarily ARM Mac.
-> and thats why it is pointless. Just take an 10GBit M1 Mini, strip the case of, shove it somewhere in the MPro, run a supershort patch cable and start screensharing.
100% the same result, without compromising the performance of either side.
 
YES, YES, YHES!!!! “Running around in circles”

Bring back the Cube!
With the better thermals on the M1 this might actually be doable again.

Apple, shut up and take my money! 🤣
 
Been waiting for this, great news. When I saw the demo of continuity during WWDC I was worried it required M1+ chips and that alone was making me think this update wouldn't happen, but it turns out that's not the case per fine print on the new MacOS page.

The 2019 Mac Pro single threaded CPU speed was so bad I couldn't justify the cost but this should be decent enough and finally with faster RAM and a not insane $5,000 gpu that performs similarly to the current high-end one.

I wonder if it will pair to the new Magic Keyboard with touch ID or not... that would require a T2 update for sure. People thinking you're going to slot an M chip into an Intel computer are crazy, but a hypothetical T3 that has some of the interoperability functionality that the M series provides would be nice though I doubt it will happen, unless they really want to close those security holes.

The ability to run x86 Windows natively is great for the long-term and in the short term not having to futz with dozens of picky apps for M1 updates / older ones that may never come is nice. Excited to sell my 16" to fund this and then get a cheap M chip laptop a good portable down the road. Releasing over the summer so the machine can stay on Big Sur for compatibility reasons would be icing on the cake.
 
-> and thats why it is pointless. Just take an 10GBit M1 Mini, strip the case of, shove it somewhere in the MPro, run a supershort patch cable and start screensharing.
100% the same result, without compromising the performance of either side.
Exactly. Especially with something like Synergy/Teleport/Apple's just-announced Universal Control.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.