Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tim Cook said they would be releasing more intel machines at WWDC. Surely he didn't just mean a single 27" iMac.
 
Can anyone who speaks Chinese suggest if maybe “for” could be interpreted as “because of” due to some correspondence of words from Chinese to English?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SWAON
That's the boat I'm in. I got the 2020 iMac for similar reasons. I really don't understand why some users have suggested intel machines are DOA now. For those that rely on specific software every day for their job it's not even a question that we need these machines for some time yet. It's baffling to me that some people are now on this OMG I NEED TO GET ONLY APPLE SILICON kick. 5 years support minimum! I'd wager 7 even. Right now an apple silicon Mac would sit in the corner for me, as it would not currently work with my plug in's in vectoroworks, wouldn't run Lightwright, and nomad wouldn't work. I look forward to get getting an apple silicon MacBook Pro some day, but my actual work will probably remain on my iMac for the foreseeable future.

Another aspect of this entire switch is that for large institutions like schools, offices, that are run by IT departments, they require ease of set up in their existing infrastructure.

They could leave one Intel laptop, one Intel imac and one Intel macpro for sale for years.
They did this for the last 13“ MBP with Superdrive, firewire and ethernet.
No need to introduce new ones, and redesigned at that! (that’s also gonna need a “T3“ if we’re talking stuff like FaceID)
 
  • Like
Reactions: anthony13
This makes perfect sense. I don't know why people would find it so hard to believe. Some customers will need Intel Macs for years to come. They will be in the minority, but they exist. For example, I knew a print shop that was running PowerPC Macs for almost a decade after the Intel transition, because they were forced to use custom PowerPC software to run some machinery. The software did not work under Rosetta and did not exist in Intel form. Furthermore, it could not be easily (aka cheaply) updated to work on Intel.

I just didn't know if Apple would just keep several 2020 Intel models around, or else if they would release new ones as a last hurrah. This leaker has dreamed the latter.
 
Just ordered a refurb Mac Mini i7 w/ 16GB because the 8GB was snatched before I could pull the trigger. Came with the 1TB SSD. Next is the OWC 64GB upgrade swap out.

Apple most certainly will be updating more Intel models. This transition will take 12-18 months longer than they projected.
Are you implying that the transition will take 3 to 3.5 years instead of 2?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billrey
I'm sure they will keep Intel just to make their new Macs feel better, it's awesome marketing strategy: "Look those awful and expensive Intel models vs our best performing affordable new Macs"

Also, wonder what the Mac Mini redesign will be like - smaller space gray apple TV box?
 
  • Like
Reactions: matrix07
we will never see another Intel processor on new Macs. Probably Mac Pros will be updated with new Xeons and Big Navis. Regarding egpus Apple has to decide whether to develop drivers for AMD gpus compatible with M cpus. I bet Apple already has its own professional gpu running on pci faster than RTXs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billrey
They could leave one Intel laptop, one Intel imac and one Intel macpro for sale for years.
They did this for the last 13“ MBP with Superdrive, firewire and ethernet.
No need to introduce new ones, and redesigned at that! (that’s also gonna need a “T3“ if we’re talking stuff like FaceID)
That's a good point, although I'd wager whatever machines they keep on sale will have to remain somewhat competitive with PC offerings to maintain an edge in the school district/office sales realm. Remember a lot of those large purchases happen early Spring, so that they can set them up over summer and redeploy for the new school year. They often need special software to run the school's proprietary app's.
 
This makes perfect sense. I don't know why people would find it so hard to believe. Some customers will need Intel Macs for years to come. They will be in the minority, but they exist. For example, I knew a print shop that was running PowerPC Macs for almost a decade after the Intel transition, because they were forced to run custom PowerPC software to run some machinery. The software did not work under Rosetta and could not be easily updated to work on Intel.

Hard to believe because there are two possible options:

The release new MBP with OLD Intel chips. Which seems pointless at least to me. What is the gain?

The release new MBP with 11Gen parts with Intel XE GPUs. They gains some iGPU performance gains, and maybe some battery life. But they incur a brand new Intel legacy support penalty right in the middle of a their transition away from Intel.

Which lesser of evils option do you find desirable?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Billrey
Doesn’t say “apple silicon”. Says “silicon”.

Could easily mean that the redesign is not just new chips but more to it than that. Much more likely than intel
Exactly, "Love to Dream" likes to keep people guessing. He's very accurate but he often uses riddles or dual meaning sentences. I think he meant more than just new Silicon instead of Intel and AS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: vionc and Billrey
I just didn't know if Apple would just keep several 2020 Intel models around, or else if they would release new ones as a last hurrah. This leaker has dreamed the latter.

If you think about it, with the
- 2018 Mac Mini
- 2019 Mac Pro
- 2019 MBP 16”
- 2020 Intel Comet Lake iMacs
- eGPU support added in March 2018

we have already been blessed with a streak of awesome “last hurrahs” to keep living the “Intel Mac life” at its fullest for years to come

what exactly a new Intel hardware would afford?
only thing I could think of is Intel not making those CPUs any longer so Apple is forced to move to newer Intel CPUs
 
My guess is that they might offer Intel Macs with current designs and spec updates for the next year or two but I doubt anything redesigned at this point would have Intel chips. The M1 Macs don't need all of the fans and ventilation that Intel Macs require so I assume Apple plans to take advantage of the extra space that they'll have when they're redesigning them.
 
This guy is probably the most reliable leaker in the game right now, batting average is incredible, but this just makes absolutely no sense at all to me.

If they're going to offer redesigned MacBooks with Intel still inside, that means they will have had to take into account Intel's processors during the design phase.. So they will likely diminish the design they could have had if just designing for ASi because it'll be hampered to accommodate the inferior thermal performance of Intel chips.

And why continue releasing Intel Macs a year into the transition anyway?? Really doesn't add up and I hate that we have to wait 7-12 months to find out what the plan is.
 
To all the people complaining & asking why... Just. Stop. This is good news if true and you're embarrassing yourself by trying to pretend otherwise.

We get it, you're excited by what the M1 has demonstrated and can't wait to see the possibilities of Apple Silicon coming to other Macs. Heck I'm excited and considering trading in my 13" MBP for an M1 MBA! But some of us still need (ex. virtualization) or want x86 (why I'll still have a hackintosh even if I get rid of my MBP), and for many of those people that do this could mean the difference between their next computer being a Mac or something else entirely.

This would also be really great news as it would more or less ensure that Apple will continue supporting the latest versions of macOS on X86 for many years after 2021. This is a good thing. Nobody wants to see Apple drop new release support for X86 after a few short years like they did with PowerPC.
 
If Kuo is right and new laptops would be released in the second half of 2021, they might come with M2 processors, which would make sense to me.
 
To all the people complaining & asking why... Just. Stop. This is good news if true and you're embarrassing yourself by trying to pretend otherwise.

We get it, you're excited by what the M1 has demonstrated and can't wait to see the possibilities of Apple Silicon coming to other Macs. Heck I'm excited and considering trading in my 13" MBP for an M1 MBA! But some of us still need (ex. virtualization) or want x86 (why I'll still have a hackintosh even if I get rid of my MBP), and for many of those people that do this could mean the difference between their next computer being a Mac or something else entirely.

This would also be really great news as it would more or less ensure that Apple will continue supporting the latest versions of macOS on X86 for many years after 2021. This is a good thing. Nobody wants to see Apple drop new release support for X86 after a few short years like they did with PowerPC (putting users of Macs not even outside of AppleCare without the latest release).
Designing to accommodate Intel's 7000 degree chips will stifle innovation in the form-factor. It's not good news.
 
This is good news, means that people who need boot camp for a few more years can do so and also means for those of us with newish Macs we will get newer versions and updates of OS11 For longer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chompineer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.