What do you think would sound better: iPhone 18 Pro Max - made in the USA by Apple. Or iPhone 18 Pro Max - designed in California made in China or India?
Whichever one costs a lot less.
Consumers are increasingly in a pinch.
What do you think would sound better: iPhone 18 Pro Max - made in the USA by Apple. Or iPhone 18 Pro Max - designed in California made in China or India?
The point is people will pay more for US made if they care.
It depends on the consumer. I will pay a lot more for free made products.This has been reported on and tried many times over by various firms in a variety of industries.
It's basically always a failure.
If you compare a Toyota Prius with comparable options to equal a base Tesla model 3, the Prius is $44,319. The Tesla with out the $7500 tax credit is $42,490.Ignoring that these are totally different comparisons (because they're very different products made by very different companies), a base hybrid Camry is like 30K, a base model 3 is 40K. Even the BZ4X (terrible name) is only like 38K.
At the moment I don't own an Apple phone, but I do appreciate that my current Samsung phone is made in Korea. Would I had pay more for that? Probably not. Is it nice to know the phone I own came from the country that Samsung is headquartered in? Yes.Whichever one costs a lot less.
Consumers are increasingly in a pinch.
So if you make the Toyota more expensive, it’ll be more expensive? Meanwhile you’re not factoring in build quality and reliability for the Toyota (arguably way more valuable than whatever options you add to the Prius), I guess because they’re not available on the Tesla for any amount of money.If you compare a Toyota Prius with comparable options to equal a base Tesla model 3, the Prius is $44,319. The Tesla with out the $7500 tax credit is $42,490.
Isn't the Model 3/Y the most reliable electric cars by a long shot?So if you make the Toyota more expensive, it’ll be more expensive? Meanwhile you’re not factoring in build quality and reliability for the Toyota (arguably way more valuable than whatever options you add to the Prius), I guess because they’re not available on the Tesla for any amount of money.
The word “reliability” appears nowhere on either of those pages. If you have a link to reliability testing and rankings please share.Isn't the Model 3/Y the most reliable electric cars by a long shot?
![]()
Best Electric Vehicles for 2025, Tested
Wondering what electric car to buy? Our testing team looks at over 200 data points when rating vehicles. Check out what made our list of the best electric vehicles to buy in 2025.www.caranddriver.com
![]()
The Best EVs To Buy In 2025: Our Favorites In Every Category
We tested dozens of electric cars to create this guide. Discover the best options, ranked on their performance, value, quality and technology.insideevs.com
Toyota's EV offering didn't even make the top 10 list. I mean besides the 'do not buy' list namely the BZ4x along side the Subaru Solterra and Lexus RZ.
The word “reliability” appears nowhere on either of those pages. If you have a link to reliability testing and rankings please share.
Well, after 3 years of owning a Tesla Model 3, my total maintenance has been having the tires rotated. I could have done this my self, but didn’t feel like the bother. I made an appointment one the Tesla phone app, a Tesla tech came out to my house on time, did the job in my garage, and topped off the washer fluid. So of the 18 new cars I have owned, I can say that the Tesla so far has had the least maintenance of any.
I just configured the toyota to have similar features that are standard on the Tesla. One thing I couldn’t add to the Toyota was ofcourse the ability to drive its self. I took a trip last month from Maryland to Buffalo, NY, and the Tesla drove there and back by its self. That’s not available on the Toyota for any amount of money.So if you make the Toyota more expensive, it’ll be more expensive? Meanwhile you’re not factoring in build quality and reliability for the Toyota (arguably way more valuable than whatever options you add to the Prius), I guess because they’re not available on the Tesla for any amount of money.
Surely you know that this is essentially meaningless, right? One car not failing is a single data point, which is proof of nothing.Well, after 3 years of owning a Tesla Model 3, my total maintenance has been having the tires rotated. I could have done this my self, but didn’t feel like the bother. I made an appointment one the Tesla phone app, a Tesla tech came out to my house on time, did the job in my garage, and topped off the washer fluid. So of the 18 new cars I have owned, I can say that the Tesla so far has had the least maintenance of any.
It’s almost like they’re so different that it’s a completely meaningless comparison, like I pointed out back in my first reply.I just configured the toyota to have similar features that are standard on the Tesla. One thing I couldn’t add to the Toyota was ofcourse the ability to drive its self. I took a trip last month from Maryland to Buffalo, NY, and the Tesla drove there and back by its self. That’s not available on the Toyota for any amount of money.
Capitulation to keep business going isn't worth congratulating. You definitely are drinking some Kool-aid.
Tell that to New Balance. Their premium made in America sneakers sell well and and are reasonably priced.This has been reported on and tried many times over by various firms in a variety of industries.
It's basically always a failure.
If you compare a Toyota Prius with comparable options to equal a base Tesla model 3, the Prius is $44,319. The Tesla with out the $7500 tax credit is $42,490.
Samsung will be assembling the design. It's like saying A17 chip is TSMC made. They just put the things together in their High tech facilities. The core design will be Apple
I will bet good money that no human hand will touch this camera between components being rolled into the warehouse, and the camera being inserted into the phone. I hope Americans are happy being canteen ladies and floor sweepers, because those are the only American jobs that will be needed at those factories.
The discussion was that it's not possible to make things American that can compete with foreign made products. So you want to compare Teslas with another made in America car? Doesn't really make sense. I don't think it makes sense to compare a stripped down base model against another car that has more features. I know when I shop for a car, I would compare cars with equal features when comparing prices. If one had heated seats, then I think the other should have them too, etc.The Prius is made in Japan. Made , shipped on a boat , and still costs the 'same' as a Tesla with no long boat trip.
[ This side thread started out as "Made in USA expensive". Any relevant example would need to be a USA made car. Otherwise you are just wandering off into a hand/arm waving swamp. ]
Adding 'options' to a car is relatively dubious because those are more substantially decoupled from labor costs (i.e., where it is made and by whom). That add-on options are usually places where vendors think they can claw some elastic demand out of ( e.g. Apple's. addition RAM or additional storage costs have diddly squat to do with labor costs differences ).
Toyota's USA made cars (sedans) beat Tesla on manufacturing costs. The camary or Corolla (standard power train models ). Toyota has mutated the Prius into a "sporty car for younger folks" product. It is not what it originally started out 'eco focused' car. Honda probably makes more USA cars than Tesla or Toyota.
And according to Gemini it is 3153 for Toyota vs 3968 for Tesla (who has a higher average selling price). So maybe we should discuss based on facts instead of asking AI.According to ChatGPT, Toyota net profit per vehicle is $1200 where as Tesla is $9570
Because the way to a richer society is to turn blue collars into white collars, raising them up into the middle class, instead of benefitting blue collars which just keeps them in the low income bracket. Not to mention turning white collars into blue collars, which is what Trump seemingly wants to do.That’s false. I simply believe that Apple’s sales, being one of the largest companies in the world, should benefit American workers vs. Indian and Chinese. Why should our purchases for an American company, benefit foreign nations?
What's wrong with being a blue collar worker? Have you ever consider that some people prefer to work with their hands? Your view of a rich society being one where blue collars workers doesn't exist, can't say I agree with that. I have friends who works in machine shops that was able to easily support their families as the sole bread winner.Because the way to a richer society is to turn blue collars into white collars, raising them up into the middle class, instead of benefitting blue collars which just keeps them in the low income bracket. Not to mention turning white collars into blue collars, which is what Trump seemingly wants to do.
As has been said a thousand times, Trump is trying to create more manufacturing jobs in a society with statistically no unemployment. The issue is not lack of jobs. The issue is people who have two or three jobs, to pay their rent.
Yeah. Obviously only employees will know the details. But designing is what Apple does well. Letting others use their expertise in manufacturing and assemblydesign ≠ 'made'. If someone is 'put the things together' then that is more about 'making' than 'designing'. TSMC absolutely manufacturers (makes) A17 chip dies.
There is decent chance that Apple has modified a Samsung design so that it tweaked toward Apple's preferences. Can't really 100% decoupled the design from the fab (manufacture) process. If Apple has selected Samsung Fabs they have been looped into the design process along to way to some extent.
P.S. from the first article in the thread
" ... his manufacturing process has not previously been deployed at a commercial scale. Sources familiar with the matter said that the sensors are to be supplied by Samsung's System LSI division and mass-produced by its foundry division. ..."
Samsung System LSI division is the 'logic design' part of Samsung. Typically works closely with the Foundry division (which produces the wafers with the chip dies on them). If this is being 'supplied' by Samsung then likely hand some contribution to the design. Otherwise Apple would only be talking to the foundry division.
2024 https://petapixel.com/2024/02/14/canon-patents-a-triple-layer-high-speed-stacked-image-sensor/
earlier 2025 https://petapixel.com/2025/07/30/sonys-triple-layer-image-sensor-promises-huge-performance-gains/
( and Sony has discussed this general concept in previous years. This 2025 is more demo of 'product' than working on the concept. )
pretty
from ealier in 2025
it isn't like Apple doing a 'thiple layer' design is revolutionary. Several sensor maker/consumers are doing them. Apple's will have some specific points they want to focus on, but the general notion that Samsung is no clue about design and Apple is telling them everything they need to do is likely overblown.
If these white collar jobs are all you think they are, then why are all these people who took out student loans and went to college to get a white collar job, asking people with blue collar jobs to pay their loans? Shouldn't they be making so much money they can pay their own?Because the way to a richer society is to turn blue collars into white collars, raising them up into the middle class, instead of benefitting blue collars which just keeps them in the low income bracket. Not to mention turning white collars into blue collars, which is what Trump seemingly wants to do.
As has been said a thousand times, Trump is trying to create more manufacturing jobs in a society with statistically no unemployment. The issue is not lack of jobs. The issue is people who have two or three jobs, to pay their rent.
I think what you have been missing is many of these other countries are not competing on equal terms. They have high tariffs on US products. Trump is trying level the playing field.And according to Gemini it is 3153 for Toyota vs 3968 for Tesla (who has a higher average selling price). So maybe we should discuss based on facts instead of asking AI.
I don’t see the relevance in debating whether US manufacturing can compete with foreign manufacturing plus outrageous tariffs. Both options will make products more expensive for the average consumer. If US wants to use US manufacturing to increase US wealth, it needs to compete on equal terms.
But a much better option is to not try to.