Yeah, I think you were the only one.Am I the only one who was looking forward to a pad where you could actually put your phone anywhere?
And those $20 “put-them-in-this-x-only” pads don’t count
Yeah, I think you were the only one.Am I the only one who was looking forward to a pad where you could actually put your phone anywhere?
And those $20 “put-them-in-this-x-only” pads don’t count
Yep, looks like they may have made a massive cock up this time.Hence why I said 'seems like', it might not be doomed to fail but announcing it when it's not even ready? Removing it from the website? Just seems like the odds are against them on this one.
But even before the recent i9 issues there have been so many occasions where Apple have prioritised form over function which resulted in thermal throttlingNot really, that's why it hasn't been released yet. Not willing to compromise on design means that their only desire is to keep working at it until it works as intended with the intended design.
Wireless is a misnomer, it is 'inductive' charging, as the device requires direct contact to the charging power source. Just like a cable connected from a power source to a device. 'wireless' charging charges or powers a receiving device without being physically connected.
I don’t think Apple wants to bring a simple “me too” product to market. They wanted something better, more useful—and something they could charge a premium for. They may or may not be able to do that. They obviously thought they’d be able to last September, though.Ok I would love for Apple to do an exact placement for the watch, AirPods, and the phone! Who cares I can't just place it anywhere on the pad. I just want to charge all three at once. I think an exact placement that works and has Apple's standards certainly be a big seller. What am I missing here?
It's either you own an old version of Apple Watch or you bought the wrong version of Qi charger. Amazon is actually selling a wider Qi charger that looks like the AirPower and charges Apple Watch and iPhone at the same time. The only missing is the special effects prompting on iPhone charging status, that thing has no practical use anyway. Save your money don't just throw them to Apple your just giving the ideas that you're willing to pay premium mentality.I'd rather have a smaller pad capable of charging a single device for a start. Apple Watch is not Qi compatible so every time I go on vacation I need to bring two cables and at least one plug. Even when I'm at home I need to charge my Watch on the only place where I have the stand capable of charging.
I'd be willing to pay a premium for an Apple pad since I won't need the separate cable for the Watch (is isn't cheap at all) I don't really care about charging multiple devices at one. I mean, is cool, but if they can't find a way to do it properly they could just release a simple version.
Apple wants to build a place your device anywhere charger. Apple doesn't want to do a similar design because everyone already does that. They want to build something that no one else has. Something that stands out. Unfortunately, if rumors are true, their reach exceeds their grasp. Philosophically admirable, but probably should have kept that goal to themselves until they had it more fleshed out.I'm not trying to say Apple is a failure. I am just trying to understand from a layman's view. So if this pad I ordered works, why does Apple not want to do a similar design?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07CP45WQW/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Apple's idea is probably that the user doesn't need to think about how they place their apple devices on the charging pad. Just put it anywhere and it charges. It's certainly more than just 3 wireless chargers glued together. I mean, heck, it even runs its own OS!I'm not trying to say Apple is a failure. I am just trying to understand from a layman's view. So if this pad I ordered works, why does Apple not want to do a similar design?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07CP45WQW/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
Forgot the sarcasm tag? Apple devices are pretty much the only electronics in my home for which I have to buy new chargers every 1-2 years because the old ones get frayed and wires are exposed. Same thing on iPhones and Macbook chargers.Why even bother? Just stick to the old fashioned way of charging devices: a 100% reliable, power cord.
Why even bother? Just stick to the old fashioned way of charging devices: a 100% reliable, power cord.
They did with original iPhone, Original Apple Watch, AirPods and HomePod but they were more detailed on the release time. I'm not fan of products being showed before they are close to being completed. I don't get why show something that is not 100% sure to be release. Personally I find it embarrassing. Not because they scrap a project but because they show it to the world as a product coming before being done testing and challenges. Still better than being released with flaws I think.
There are multiple charging stands that eliminate the placement issue. You can't place your phone in the wrong place one these stands... unless you're intentionally trying to place it in the wrong place. Charge landscape or vertical. You can't miss the charge area.
![]()
I must be missing something. I have worked with inductive coil chargers before, clear back in 1991-3 with the GM EV1 "Impact" electric car. They aren't rocket science. Just clearly mark on the pad where the phone goes, where the watch goes and where the AirPod case goes and design around the requirement that the user puts the device where it belongs so 1 charger can charge all 3 devices at once. From the articles I've read, it seems like the idea of being able to place a device anywhere on the pad and the pad figuring out what and where it is is adding a lot of complexity to what should be a pretty simple device. The charging mat could still identify the device so it doesn't overcharge the watch if it is put in the space where the phone is supposed to go but it wouldn't have to charge it if it were placed in the wrong spot.
I'm not trying to say Apple is a failure. I am just trying to understand from a layman's view. So if this pad I ordered works, why does Apple not want to do a similar design?
https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07CP45WQW/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o03_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1
I just re-watched the announcement. I feel like they weren't too confident. Schiller uses words like, "Want, "Think" and "Idea".
"Our team wants to create something"
"We're going to give you a sneak peak of this Idea right now."
"We think we have an idea of how to make this a better experience."
It was a concept.
He also put a lot of emphasis on how they wanted other manufacturers to innovate and push the limits on the standard.
"But our team knows how to do this" but he may very well have been wrong.
Who says they weren’t? Do you have inside info that we don’t or just pure soeculstion?
With that level of complication the price would be way beyond acceptable levels.
Wireless charging as it is now I find completely useless. There is no difference for me if i place phone or watch on the mat or hook it up via cable.
That technology is not promising. Once the real wireless technology will be available I will maybe change my mind. Lets say 3m range.
Sure, that would have been best, especially now that it’s getting to the end of their availability window and it looks like they’re probably not going to make it.<snip>I agree with others that I would not have announced the product so early if these reports of engineering challenges are true.