How are the two comparable friend?
I never said adding a pop personality would be beneficial to Apple. I've never implied that notion either. Apple IS arguably the leading technology company in Pop Culture today (they don't need anyONE to help with that). So that fact alone kills your logic.
However, I'll play along.
You want to know why they wouldn't give the job to her, because she doesn't have ANYTHING that would make Apple more profitable.
Jimmy Iovine, for the most part, is bringing contracts and a subscription service that Apple no longer has to build from the ground up. That alone is enough, but they will also get a nice portable headphone product too. That's why this deal is happening. Mr. Iovine has a lot of connections in the music industry (nice perk for Apple here). He also owns a record label with artist that range from The All-American Rejects to Kendrick Lamar. From Eninem to Lady Gaga. Zedd to U2 etc. This isn't about Jimmy or Dre but about the brand and the connects these guys will bring.
Lol Kim Kardashian. What exactly is she famous for again? At least you can research Jimmy and find out what he's done and who's careers he has at the palm of his hands.![]()
Well, at least you did not disagree that the products he makes are junk.