Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
AI features that require less processing power will run entirely on-device, but more demanding tools will operate via the cloud. Apple will apparently tout the privacy advantages of this plan.
What advantages? All features that Apple plans to do on the device are already done on the device by Apple's (to put it politely) main "source of inspiration" which is Samsung. Besides marketing speech there is no privacy advantage as far as AI is concerned.
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Amazing Iceman
For me, only the retouch feature. The rest I can hopefully disable.
They didn’t mention what kind of retouch. I just hope it is at least as good as Firefire by Adobe, or at least Google Photos standard. Anything less is a dismay.
 
Available only on iPhone 16 pro max ultra starting at 2500 euro.
Really hope Apple still has enough class to avoid a screen saying:

This device is unable to support the magical AI features of iOS 18.
Tap here to open the Apple Store app and upgrade your device
Tap here to continue without upgrading or finding happiness
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672 and Roll0
Really hope Apple still has enough class to avoid a screen saying:

This device is unable to support the magical AI features of iOS 18.
Tap here to open the Apple Store app and upgrade your device
Tap here to continue without upgrading or finding happiness
You bet they will do that eventually, milking the cow as much as possible
 
  • Like
Reactions: Roll0
You’d be surprised what’s most important to mainstream buyers. Apple knows their market.

However Wall Street is all about AI and can’t get enough of this nonsense. Nvidia only adds to it powering much of it. Apple has no choice knowing their sales are in decline.

Apple says screw it. Here’s your AI emojis. Boxes checked.
I would be impressed if AI creates unique emojis, but I don’t think so.

This way, I don’t have to read about Apple adding new emojis when a new iOS is released. It is crazy how adding emojis on iOS is “news”!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 88tatz
"Suggested replies" are very cringe. People should still write their replies themselves. At least when writing to friends.
Indeed! Before AI replies, what we need is Siri to hear us correctly the first time! After that, to be able to maintain context when making multiple requests, and to integrate with a significantly expanded Shortcuts. Obviously Shortcut-level of integration would need a comprehensive but simple to understand UI to confirm Siri’s understanding matches the user requests.
 
You may say this is an unlikely example, but if the features are 100% unobtrusive, how many people would actually bother to try them outside of our gadget enthusiast community at MR?

I think you have that backwards. Most MR readers, already having their mind made up, will reflexively hate it.

Others, with an open mind (and not having an anti-Apple mindset) will give it a whirl and probably like the experience and results. And keep on using it going forward.
 
Last edited:
Just reading this thread it’s super obvious that all the posters have kept up to date with the developments of Apple’s on device neuro engines.
 
Like it or not, probably-old dudes above me here, lots of people use emojis heavily in text conversations rather than typing out unique descriptions. I for one think it might be kind of fun to invent phrases that would trigger emoji creation, like "goth sadness." :)
Egyptians started using emojis heavily until their whole writing became what we know as Hieroglyphs.
Soon our world will also "evolve" to have a single Emoji-based writing language, easy to understand by anyone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nt5672
What advantages? All features that Apple plans to do on the device are already done on the device by Apple's (to put it politely) main "source of inspiration" which is Samsung. Besides marketing speech there is no privacy advantage as far as AI is concerned.
Apple's (to put it politely) main "source of inspiration"???

Hahahah! That really made me laugh.... Where were you in 2010?
Do some historical research and you will learn something.
Samsung copied Apple since the beginning of the iPhone. If it wasnt' for apple, we would still have phones that look like the BlackBerry or with a slide out keyboard, with a plastic touch display (not capacitative display). Their first phones were a shameless copy of the iPhone.
And that has continue. They must have moles inside Apple spying on new features. Otherwise Apple wouldn't go to great lengths to keep their projects top secret.

And most features Samsung rushed to deploy have already been under research by Apple and only released when the feature works as expected.
Take FaceID as an example. You can't compare it to Samsung's garbage face recognition.
Folding phones? Apple has been working on them and considered the display technology was up tp their standards.
In the meantime, Samsung rushed to released folding phones that flopped.
 
Last edited:
Along with rcs crap coming to iOS 18, I’ll be turning most of these off.
I predict Apple will claim to have invented RCS at WWDC.
Also, they have the suggested email follow up thing in Sonoma and I have to turn that off again every time there's an update. Hate it.
 
18 features fall under the category of Bells and Whistles. Nothing there that’s a must-have feature
Hopefully Apple can do More with AI than this
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechnoTiger3000
In Power On it said that AI features on device "will be supported by iPhone, iPad and Mac chips released in the last year or so" Does that mean that only iPhone 14 and 15 will get AI features and every other iPhone left behind?
It likely means older devices will support it online via Apple's servers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TechnoTiger3000
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.