Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Under Tim Cook’s leadership, Apple has delivered several successful products, such as the Apple Watch, AirPods, the M-series MacBooks, and the Apple Pencil.

However, there have also been notable shortcomings, including the cancellation of the Apple Car project, the slow progress of Apple Vision, and challenges on the AI-driven software side.
 
Can I say something without everyone getting mad?

Jony-Ive.jpeg
 
What made Jobs great is his appreciation of liberal arts: "We’ve always tried to be at the intersection of technology and liberal arts."

That is, design.

Not so much "innovation" or "1TB SSDs for cheap" but art, aesthetics, balance.

"Aquinas says: 'The aesthetic experience is in three moments.' And he names them Integritas, Convenientia and Claritas."

Additionally, he had good taste and was usually able to say no to bad ideas before any of us ever got a whiff of it.

(nobody is perfect on that, of course)
 
The devil you know, everyone...

While I'm curious as to who will take his place, I'm a bit worried because they could just double-down on services, and leave hardware high and dry...and just make it painful to not subscribe to Apple's offerings.
 
Can I say something without everyone getting mad?

Sure, you can say it. I'll probably be moving on from Apple altogether if that happens, though. Without someone like Jobs to keep his nonsense in order, we'll end up with all form over function.

There is nothing Apple currently offers that I can't do without, or fairly easily move on from, even though they have been my phone and computer brand for pushing 20 years.
 
The devil you know, everyone...

While I'm curious as to who will take his place, I'm a bit worried because they could just double-down on services, and leave hardware high and dry...and just make it painful to not subscribe to Apple's offerings.

Might be better honestly.

Make the cut .. quit the current illusion they are running of still being the old Apple, while doing all sorts of unsavory stuff now.
 
As a shareholder, Cook was great. He more than doubled their investments over the years.

As a user, Cook was not great. After running out of runway from Jobs' plans, came a lot of decisions to squeeze every dime out of their customers and the software (stability and design) went downhill.

Yet, given how it is right now, I have no confidence that the board will select a replacement that would be any better than now.
 
The devil you know, everyone...

While I'm curious as to who will take his place, I'm a bit worried because they could just double-down on services, and leave hardware high and dry...and just make it painful to not subscribe to Apple's offerings.
I'm also a bit worried that the Mac line would come to an end given the attention macOS has been getting recently (that is, barely)
 
As a shareholder, Cook was great. He more than doubled their investments over the years.

As a user, Cook was not great. After running out of runway from Jobs' plans, came a lot of decisions to squeeze every dime out of their customers and the software (stability and design) went downhill.
Spot on. And we're on the 26th version of iOS yet it is still bloated, Siri stinks beyond expression, the Settings area is buried with an 80% accurate Search box, Parental Controls is a complete joke, and more issues. Nothing's perfect, I get it. But 26 versions later and I still can't get Apple Maps to take me home the same way it got me there?
 
You can't sit here and tell me (us) that Tim has overseen, as a CEO, grand new inventions in his almost 15 years as CEO .
No, because neither did Steve Jobs.
I feel like this is a well-known fact already that people like to ignore, but, Apple has never really been the company to *invent* things. Even the iPhone was a bunch of technology that already existed compiled together, it wasn’t even the first touchscreen phone, an apple at that time, even didn’t create the majority of technology put into it.
However under Cook we have seen…
The first iPad, MacBook, iMac and external display with retina quality resolution. When Jobs passed away outside of the iPhone, the highest quality display you could get on a mobile Apple product was sub-1080P.
The first Apple created CPU and GPU. While Steve Jobs saw the introduction of the A4 and A5, these were modified Samsung chips with PowerVR GPUs. The first truly designed by Apple CPU was the A6 in the iPhone 5, and Apple didn’t design its own in-house GPU until the A11 in 2017, over half a decade after jobs’ death.
The Apple Watch. Let’s not forget that the Samsung Galaxy gear introduced in 2013 set records for being one of Best Buy‘s most returned products in history, the Apple Watch was truly the first successful modern smart watch.
AirPods. Wireless headphones existed before it, but not quite in the same way. The AirPods were the first main stream truly wireless headphones, and even though it’s been forgotten over the years, they had features that we take for granted these days like a case that could recharge them on the go and automatic device pairing and switching.
The Neural Engine first used in the A11 Bionic. Despite Apple’s struggle with large language models, they were putting neural engines in their products five years before anyone knew what a LLM was.
FaceID. It’s level of security still hasn’t been matched, all of the competitors can still be fooled with photographs. As far as I know, it’s still the only facial recognition technology in a smart phone or a tablet that uses dot projection and has that level of security.
The M1 chip. Do I even need to elaborate? So, so much skepticism for something that ended up working out so, so well.
The Apple Vision Pro. Love it or hate it, it certainly isn’t a rehashed Jobs product, it is very much its own thing.

And this isn’t even barely scratching the surface of the moves that Apple has made within the last 15 years.
 
Hasn't introduced, in 14+ years of his CEO tenure, a single new product unless you are counting AirTags and Beats.
First of all Airtags are, in fact, a pretty cool and super useful (and successful) product, so dismissing them is just weird

Second of all: Apple Silicon? Apple Watch? AVP? Homepods? Airpods?

Third of all the iphone and ipad were not the mature platforms of today when jobs was with us, that maturation has happened under cook
In my view butchered the iMac/desktop Mac line. Um, we all don't need or want a laptop. Period.
The m4 mini is in many ways the best desktop mac Apple has ever made

The studio is the actually successful realization of the concept that NeXT/Apple tried with the NeXT Cube, the G4 Cube, and the 2013 MP

The iMac may for whatever reason not be what *you* want, but it’s a beautiful and apparently successful device

The current mac pro is languishing, but it’s not aimed at the general desktop market to begin with
Killed the iPod line for no other reason other than attempt to convince parents to buy their <13 year-old kids $1000 iPhones instead of $150 iPods.
Or, wait for it, the standalone PMP market was dying.
As an adult, I still beg for an iPod...but Tim killed it.
You know you can just go buy one, right? The 100s of millions of ipods in existence didnt get bricked when Apple stopped making them, ebay is flooded with ‘em, and Apple’s software still supports them. I still use a gen 3 iPod around the house
 
I know many posting here don't like Tim, but before you cheer you need to find out if they replace him with someone better or even worse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: digimc
Spot on. And we're on the 26th version of iOS yet it is still bloated, Siri stinks beyond expression, the Settings area is buried with an 80% accurate Search box, Parental Controls is a complete joke, and more issues. Nothing's perfect, I get it. But 26 versions later and I still can't get Apple Maps to take me home the same way it got me there?
Just going address that last point since it is related to what I work on in the geospatial end of things: map routing optimization is usually not designed to repeat the same route backwards, it’s designed to get you the best possible route. So it is very likely that given the map layers and data sources Maps is using to pick that route it probably does have very valid reasons for why it’s not the same route in both directions, and that will happen with any mapping tool albeit in different ways depending again on the underlying data and whatever priorities the routing model is using
 
Well there goes Apple TV!
1B/year loser!

(the content, not the hardware)
Yes this is true. Some would argue that Apple is playing the long game. Apple TV was always going to struggle to compete against Netflix, Hulu, Disney and the other bigger streaming service. Apple has to rely too much on original programing and sports. But Apple probably sees and end game where they will start to become more of a sports hub, MLB, MLS, NHL and that will start to allow it to turn the corner.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.