Yea, that came to mind too, Apple seeding rumors to hype it up… works with GurmanMarketing tactic. “Such a unique, complex, innovative design - there won’t be many on the shelf, make sure to pre-order immediately.”
It’s insane that you need presciption to buy lenses or glasses where in Europe you can buy them in grocery store or chemistry 🤦♂️I'm not sure if a 3500+ USD device with (often) personalised prescription lens inserts will work for in-store pickup. Most of the buyers will be businesses and wealthy people with more money than free time, none of which are silly enough to go to an Apple store for pick-up.
I would love to see demo units there though, I'm okay with booking an appointment and getting a few minutes with the device on my head to see if I like it.
This thing will be sold-out right away though, no matter the production numbers.
Do not forget. TWO HOURS of battery life. And then there’s the argument of “You can plug it in to provide power” but then that defeats your argument of “portability” “traveling” “using it on the go” etc. Also, you do realize that you are only able to stream ONE MacBook screen, right?$3,500 isn’t a lot of money nowadays especially after the fed printed trillions.
No idea about discomfort since most people preordering have not tried it on.
The world is huge. Lots of people have lots of money. There will be more than 200k people who want and can afford this.
For me, the killer application is the ability to have unlimited screen space when I’m traveling and coding.
There is no way 200k units will be enough to satisfy demand in 2024.
I disagree. With higher volumes, price goes down.
These reports are typical of EVERY launch of the iPhone and everything works out.
This is normal and I doubt the numbers as they could easily change as Apple irons out the process problems.
It’s basically FUD.
That is possible, but given how seemingly complex the device is to make, we are many years away from any sort of price reduction. I actually think $3499 is inexpensive for what they are offering. They may offer different models with various degrees of supply constraint, similar to what Tesla does.Agreed. We saw how the iPhone 5C "flopped" in the market so I do not see Apple offering a "Vision Pro Air" with a plastic chassis and LED displays.
What is more likely is that as production capacity and yields of the components increases, the BoM will fall and that will allow Apple to lower the MSRP. It will never be "cheap", but it could eventually end up a $2499 device or perhaps even $1999 device.
It is also possible this is just an interim project designed to provide a bridge to an actual "eyeglass" type Augmented Reality product a few years down the road that would be simpler and by extension cheaper than the full VR/AR experience the Vision Pro offers. Apple could keep the Vision Pro in the lineup (at a lower price than today), but the "mainstream" model would be the "AR glasses".
Interesting. I have an astigmatism so each eye has different corrections. I doubt a vending machine could help me. Plus I wear progressive lenses for daily/driving and a special reading glasses adjusted to 18” for computer wear.It’s insane that you need presciption to buy lenses or glasses where in Europe you can buy them in grocery store or chemistry 🤦♂️
This way without problems I bough lenses in vendor machines or ordered them online without revisiting optician. Also bought myopia lenses for PSVR2 without need of government to allow me that.
Maybe you are not directly telling that but I merged what I read on Reddit about USA few weeks ago
Marketing tactic. “Such a unique, complex, innovative design - there won’t be many on the shelf, make sure to pre-order immediately.”
And I just don’t see the rumored “eyeglass” type AR device ever happening. It’s a moonshot project, and I don’t even see the practical usage of this type of device. I think after using the VP, expectations will be so high that such a device would never be able to come close to the experience.
El oh el. Five years ahead in a category that will go absolutely nowhereCan't even compare the Vision Pro to the Charging Mat. Two totally different arenas!
Apple is at least 5 years ahead of the competition ... again... so they have time for the tech to mature, and production processes to be perfected.
I meant Apple is lying. It’s obvious that analysts make their predictions from supply chain info, which Apple could perfectly control.You're assuming the analysts know what they're talking about and are deliberately lying. They don't know, they're just guessing.
- l
- What's the killer application?
I meant Apple is lying. It’s obvious that analysts make their predictions from supply chain info, which Apple could perfectly control.
They'll be lucky to sell that in the first year. Have you even seen this product? It's an iPad, that requires wearing a massive and uncomfortable headset, that only lasts 2 hours, and costs $3500+.
I meant Apple is lying. It’s obvious that analysts make their predictions from supply chain info, which Apple could perfectly control.
I’m not going to put it on and code while I’m in a car or bus. I’ll be at a hotel/Airbnb, or remote office.Do not forget. TWO HOURS of battery life. And then there’s the argument of “You can plug it in to provide power” but then that defeats your argument of “portability” “traveling” “using it on the go” etc. Also, you do realize that you are only able to stream ONE MacBook screen, right?
You’re right, glasses that fix for astigmatism can’t be purchased from a vending machine. There are cheap glasses for simple near/farsightedness that can be purchased at any drug store in the US, too, but not astigmatism.Interesting. I have an astigmatism so each eye has different corrections. I doubt a vending machine could help me. Plus I wear progressive lenses for daily/driving and a special reading glasses adjusted to 18” for computer wear.
Apple definitely controls the supply chain info, but that ends up in analysts not being able to get ANY current information. It’s all months old at best and from folks that are likely not even part of the supply chain anymore.I meant Apple is lying. It’s obvious that analysts make their predictions from supply chain info, which Apple could perfectly control.
When I use a mouse, I have at a minimum three unique inputs I can effortlessly give at any one location. I obviously haven't tried this thing (and am biased, it seems extremely DOA in my opinion), but i can't for the life of me understand how using your eyes is more efficient than a mouse for most tasks given the extremely limited input. Extra so for a keyboard- how is looking around at various menus a faster use of my time than launching a macro or keyboard shortcut?With a mouse or trackpad, you have to move the cursor. With Vision Pro you just look at things, and that's that. That's a super fast method of interaction, no matter what task you're doing on the computer.
I don't think you can lurk on macrumours and try to accuse the Financial Times of poor sourcing lol. Disagree with the analysis if you choose, but the Financial Times is an extremely credible news source, and far from a gimmicky clickbait site.This is key in getting someone to sign up for your “paywalled report”. It doesn’t even matter that there ARE no supply chain informants, they just have to talk a good enough game for folks paying for the report to think, “Yes, I’m totally getting insider information that no one else (other than the other folks paying for the report) can get!!”