Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
- Dvd drive
- express card slot
- ethernet port

+ retina display

ram are also cheaper now as compared to last year (unless they put more)
 
I guess them not including ethernet and FW is one way to save money. Too bad they will still add $200 to the price-tag because well they're a high margin company and if it cost them $100, why not charge $200!!!

RETINA!
 
Does anyone else want a 3360x2100 Retina screen option for the 15" MBP? The 2880x1800 one is useless, too little screen real estate - it would be a downgrade from the existing 1680x1050 15" MBP.
 
What people forget to think about is that the current displays weren't always this cheap.

I bet when they were introduced in 2008 (I think) they were equally expensive, yet Apple hasn't raised their MacBook Pro prices.
 
I'm all for a matte option, but I'm confused as to why we used to support glass CRTs heavily over LCD monitors in the professional world if the reflection level was SO AWFUL as many would have you believe.

I for one freelance in photography and design quite successfully with a glossy iMac. Now if I had a MBP that I used outside, I'd look for some kind of glare-reducing option... but that's kind of an extreme situation.

I'll take double DPI over matte any day for my personal workflow.

I use my Glossy MBP for most of my photo work, and haven't had any problems with it personally.

That said, if you remember, most of the professional or good quality CRT screens had coatings on them to reduce glare and Refraction, that, or they had a post production process to reduce the glossiness of the glass in other ways.

More on topic.

I honestly doubt that Apple would be subsidizing the cost of these new displays by much. If anything, they would find cost cutting measures within the product to help reduce production expenses that would hopefully make up for the more expensive screens.
 
"Retina", according to Apple, just means that the eye is unable to see individual pixels at a normal viewing distance. Every MacBook, iMac, and Apple display is already "retina".
 
Think how much the cost of components have come down over the life cycle of the current line-up.

Also, knowing what they sell for in general, and knowing what kind of price Apple can negotiate are two different things.

I do think Apple will eat the cost - I don't think they want to go down the road of increasing the base price when they can make it up in add-ons anyway.
 
There's never any news about a retina display Mac mini!

Oh wait...

My mac mini does not have any visible pixels-- retina display FTW!



I wonder if the retina display will be standard across the whole line, or only on the higher-tier models, or as a BTO option?
 
If Apple manages to keep the same price they have now but with retina and what not, this thing is gonna sell like never before.
 
I'm all for a matte option, but I'm confused as to why we used to support glass CRTs heavily over LCD monitors in the professional world if the reflection level was SO AWFUL as many would have you believe.

I for one freelance in photography and design quite successfully with a glossy iMac. Now if I had a MBP that I used outside, I'd look for some kind of glare-reducing option... but that's kind of an extreme situation.

I'll take double DPI over matte any day for my personal workflow.

Ha ha. Yeah. I don't remember anyone complaining that glass CRTs were hard to read and we used those things for 20 years.

But suddenly glass is impossible to use on a computer screen? I don't get it either.
 
Don't forget the 1680x1050 screen on 15" MBP in Retina form! It's very important to many people.
 
2880x1800? I had to buy reading glasses when I got my last MBP 17" because everything was so small on it's 1920 x 1200 display. Isn't it time to update the OS to factor this in, much like the iPad OS does?

I know you can set the font size on most apps and adjust icon size, etc, but the OS in general seems designed for lower resolution displays. Maybe I'm just too old and should be taken out back and shot.

And despite my rant, I will likely buy a 15" on day one.
 
Does anyone else want a 3360x2100 Retina screen option for the 15" MBP? The 2880x1800 one is useless, too little screen real estate - it would be a downgrade from the existing 1680x1050 15" MBP.

This.

I don't want retina, i want 1680x1050 for the 13'', 1920x1200 for the 15'' and 2560x1600 for the 17'' models. That would be a real improvement, high DPI is just not as important as screen realestate.
 
About the pricing, remember how expensive the original MacBook Air cost? And how much it has come down since then. We should see something similar happen with MBPs.

New generation of MBAs started with a lower, less inflated, price point. Hope to see it here too, although I'm willing to pay a lot for a Retina display in a laptop lol.
 
Prices are going to increase. They are going to introduce a new design with a completely different chassis and different components, as opposed to the unibody design they are using since 2008. Maybe they are going to make audacious moves like going SSD-only as well, while retaining decent storage. Expect the prices to grow $50-100 and drop with the next speedbump.
 
So here's my math:

Retina +$100
256 GB SSD +200 (500 GB 2.5 drives are about $100, 256 GB SSD are about $300)
ODD -$30
Ethernet -$0
-----------------------
Added cost for anything like an equivalent: $270

Youch!

I'm guessing Apple will need to see cost savings in other places or take smaller margins. Taking the 15" $1799 base and going to $2199 or 2099 is probably going to hurt them quite a lot in total sales. Then upgraded models are going to run up close to $3000. I don't think even apple can charge that much for a laptop. My theory is that they will hit a nonlinearity in market elasticity around that $2000 15" base range.
 
I dont care about the $100 add-on, just release the goddamn machines all ready.
 
Even though the DVD drive and some ports are coming off, USB3+2nd thunderbolt+SSD+retina will undoubtedly cut apple's profit margin tremendously if sticking to the current price points. This is Apple's chance to offer a bang for your buck, something they are not known for doing, but a move that would keep them ahead of the competition for 2+ years. It is interesting to watch which direction they end up going. Also wouldn't be surprised if entry level 15" is discontinued as a result.
 
I saw and played with the new iPad and the retina display was not a mayor factor at all.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.