Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
How do you know if it’s the new maps?
Outside cities, or at distant zoom levels, the biggest telltale sign is vast areas of shaded vegetation. Inside cities, better telltale signs are shaded football fields, tracks, baseball fields, swimming pools, etc., though there’s also some vegetation shading (just less of it because, well, buildings).

If it’s not inside a city and you see vast expanses of the standard off-white background, then the area doesn’t have the new map.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
Washington DC hasn’t been updated.... no look around and no enhanced satellite imagery

Washington, D.C. was updated on September 30th.

Look Around is only available in a few metro areas at this time:
  • Hawaii (Island of O'ahu) - Added June 3, 2019
  • Las Vegas metro area - Added June 3, 2019
  • San Francisco/San Jose metro area - Added June 3, 2019
  • Los Angeles metro area - Added September 30, 2019
  • New York City metro Area - Added September 30, 2019
  • Houston - Added November 18, 2019
  • Santa Cruz, CA - Added December 18, 2019
Apple didn't promise Look Around would be available nationwide by the end of 2019, only their new Maps data.

I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say "enhanced satellite imagery".
 
Outside cities, or at distant zoom levels, the biggest telltale sign is vast areas of shaded vegetation. Inside cities, better telltale signs are shaded football fields, tracks, baseball fields, swimming pools, etc., though there’s also some vegetation shading (just less of it because, well, buildings).

If it’s not inside a city and you see vast expanses of the standard off-white background, then the area doesn’t have the new map.

You left out building outlines. Outside of large cities, outlines didn't exist for most buildings (stores, houses, etc.).

For instance, none of my iOS devices have the last update yet, so there are very few buildings in my area that can be seen without switching to satellite view.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonblatho
Boo. iOS needs a way to enable/disable dark mode on a per-app basis for pre-installed native apps.
Back during the 13.0 betas I filed a suggestion to at least allow disabling the dark map like you can on macOS. Hopefully they’ll get to it eventually; I fully agree that the dark map is harder to read.

You left out building outlines. Outside of large cities, outlines didn't exist for most buildings (stores, houses, etc.).

For instance, none of my iOS devices have the last update yet, so there are very few buildings in my area that can be seen without switching to satellite view.
Oh yes, that, too.
 
Here’s one problem, though. How do you determine the difference between “traffic is good everywhere in my immediate vicinity” from “the map isn‘t displaying traffic data yet”? I suppose the former never happens in Cupertino, but it’s not unknown within the mile or two around my house.

Right now, where I live, the Google traffic map in my immediate vicinity is all green - at a glance I know there are no issues. With the Apple map, I have to expand it a few times until I see some areas displaying congestion - only then do I know for sure there’s not a data issue.

Exactly...Apple doesn’t bother with neighborhoods, secondary streets with so little data it’s not worth putting “green.”

Google uses the identical method of collecting the data with the additional “benefit” of predicted traffic patterns based on their algorithm. Like Apple’s clear (non-green) roads, Google shows green in the majority of roads and it NEVER changes. It’s really a false sense of “no traffic.” Of course I don’t have traffic in my neighborhood or any of the surrounding neighborhoods. Do I really need a green road to tell me that?

The problem I see on Google Maps all the time is that nearly every intersection in my area shows red simply because cars stop at rep lights. Apple will only show red there when the traffic is built up enough to miss normal light cycles.

I use Apple Maps every day (in Michigan usually...maybe not the best example of constant or varying traffic), but it has been dead on for both medium (orange) or heavy (red) traffic.

I also travel quite a bit to NYC, Philly, Boston...always spot on there as well.

It’s a preference thing for sure...and like you said, traffic reports on the news LOVE to show green like Google Maps has for years to show the “traffic” is moving. I prefer to see traffic, not lack of it.
 
Exactly...Apple doesn’t bother with neighborhoods, secondary streets with so little data it’s not worth putting “green.”

You're making an erroneous assumption.

There are parts of two highways which fall within the default view of the map around my house. They pretty much always have enough traffic for meaningful data, and knowing the status of traffic on those highways is important. With Google maps, I can immediately see if they're flowing well or not. With Apple maps, you can't tell right away whether they're flowing well or the map just doesn't have data yet - per my original comment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marekul
You're making an erroneous assumption.

There are parts of two highways which fall within the default view of the map around my house. They pretty much always have enough traffic for meaningful data, and knowing the status of traffic on those highways is important. With Google maps, I can immediately see if they're flowing well or not. With Apple maps, you can't tell right away whether they're flowing well or the map just doesn't have data yet - per my original comment.

And I’m telling you that with Google, green can mean “no data”...red or yellow OR GREEN can mean “we think there may or may not be traffic there because historical data is used to fill in the gaps.”

If you prefer the graphic representation of Google traffic, then fine. But that’s your preference.

There are certainly examples on BOTH sides where traffic data doesn’t match reality, but generally speaking, they are usually identical in my experience with the only difference being how it is shown on the map.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
I keep saying it: Maps are unreadable because of the use of very light colors. Especially slightly less light yellow for roads on light yellow background; unbelievable.
Being completely serious: have you ever been thoroughly tested for color-blindness? There are some less common types and a range of variations that can make distinguishing certain colors almost impossible. Just a thought, because the roads aren’t slightly less light yellow on a light yellow background; they’re actually a more yellow color, outlined in orange to increase contrast. But yes, on a yellowish gray background. Agree it hardly pops, but it’s far from unreadable (to me).

PS Lack of contrast is hard to read/fatiguing. There are websites I won’t even bother with because they use a light gray text on a somewhat darker gray background, or almost as bad, a dark gray on even darker gray background. No, Mr/Ms graphic designer, I don’t think the website you designed looks modern. And no, it’s not high-end or classy. It’s unusable.
 
Last edited:
I hate to be that guy, but we have one more year left in the decade. We went through this at the turn of the millennium.

We started at year 1 through 10. Year 11 is the next decade. And so on and so forth.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SidricTheViking
I hate to be that guy, but we have one more year left in the decade. We went through this at the turn of the millennium.

We started at year 1 through 10. Year 11 is the next decade. And so on and so forth.

Yes, but only sort of. The precise definition is neither used nor useful in standard English. When you speak of the decade of the Roaring 20's you don't mean 1921 thru 1930. A decade as used in common English is defined by the 2nd digit, not a span of years on a calendar that started on 1/1/2001

And Pluto is a planet, dammit! And get those kids off my lawn!
 
Just a little :) Or at least a bit of a clarification.
I always check this page for the best maps information. According to this site, they're just in testing, so some will see the changes, sone won't. So, the data capture may be considered complete, but the rollout is not complete until everyone has it.

IDK, I've had the updated maps for a few days and that site didn't have any mention until this news broke.

FWIW, the new maps look fantastic in CarPlay.
 
IDK, I've had the updated maps for a few days and that site didn't have any mention until this news broke.

FWIW, the new maps look fantastic in CarPlay.

Actually, his site was updated back on December 18th when the new area was first released and then pulled off later that same day.

I’m hoping MacRumors knows something we don’t as this headline is definitely misleading since every device I’ve checked does NOT have the new area.
 
The author should proofread the following several sentences, because it plainly actually means that Apple did not make good on the promise.

"Apple has made good on that promise with the rollout of the new mapping terrain to large swathes of the United States, and the updated Maps are now available across most of the country. It could still take some time for all users in the Central and Southeastern areas of the U.S. to see the new content."
 
  • Like
Reactions: jonblatho
The author should proofread the following several sentences, because it plainly actually means that Apple did not make good on the promise.

"Apple has made good on that promise with the rollout of the new mapping terrain to large swathes of the United States, and the updated Maps are now available across most of the country. It could still take some time for all users in the Central and Southeastern areas of the U.S. to see the new content."

There is still 4 days left... :)
 
Why’s everyone getting bent out of shape that an American company focused on American first?
[automerge]1577487923[/automerge]

How do you know if it’s the new maps?

Apple is a global company, fact.

But, I do understand Apple needs to start somewhere, they can't update Maps in the whole world instantly.
 
Washington, D.C. was updated on September 30th.


I'm not sure what you're talking about when you say "enhanced satellite imagery".

if you compare the satellite images for either New York or San Francisco with Washington DC, DC does not have the same level of detail, you cannot zoom in at the same level, and in 3D you cannot change the viewing angle.

as to dark mode, it’s more of a CarPlay issue for me. I drive with my lights on during the day which triggers dark mode. If I zoom out to look for slow or stopped traffic ahead, the traffic information disappears...
 
if you compare the satellite images for either New York or San Francisco with Washington DC, DC does not have the same level of detail, you cannot zoom in at the same level, and in 3D you cannot change the viewing angle.

as to dark mode, it’s more of a CarPlay issue for me. I drive with my lights on during the day which triggers dark mode. If I zoom out to look for slow or stopped traffic ahead, the traffic information disappears...

But that’s exactly what he said...the update schedule is for the Apple owned data and does not necessarily apply to satellite images, Look Around, etc.

In fact, many of the new maps areas still have dated 2D satellite images while some in the old maps areas have had 3D “flyover” satellite imagery for years.

New Maps areas include Apple owned road data and non-satellite 2D/3D building imagery. Look Around, Stop sign/traffic light and updated satellite imagery implementation are separate layers being added as completed (hopefully really soon).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.