Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Even for paying off debt, there was a case where someone threw a bag with 2,000 pennies at someone whom he owed 20 dollars, and he got arrested for assault.

The whole penny tactic is a gray area and a funny inconvenient way to pay off someone you are displeased with, especially thousands dollars. But yeah, the way it's delivered could cause an unrelated issue.
 
Please, please, don't do this. Don't be that guy.

The cashier and the store clerks earn $15/hour, maybe. Please remember that.
If you want to share your opinion, it's more effective to tell the manager than the cashier.

That's what I did when Rite Aid turned on a feature called KidCents on my frequent shopper card. Without my permission, or permission from anyone in my family, they started rounded up my purchases to the next dollar and donating that money to charity. It was a good cause but less-than-honest for them to spend my money (and gain themselves good publicity) without my knowledge. When I noticed it on a receipt and challenged them, they offered me a refund on my purchase but not the rounded up extra cents!

I've switched to shopping at the competitor around the corner, and Apple Pay acceptance is another reason I'll continue voting with my pocketbook. Neither of these is a life-and-death issue or a reason to go ballistic, just my 2 cents when it comes to consumer choice.
 
Curious, so the people who made a purchase from Rite Aid, right after they went home and since the purchase did not go through with Apple Pay does this mean their purchase is free? Rite Aid can not say over 1,000 customer stole items lol.
 
Good luck with the Rite Aid system.

These are all things that should have been worked out ahead of time. What good is a system that you never know will work. You need to build confidence in a system to get people on board. Right now I've tried to use my Apple Pay 3 times and it worked 1 time.

Unlike Apple Pay the Rite Aid system stores your data.
 
Load up a cart at the offending (non-ApplePay) merchant and go to checkout.

When they say,

"Oh, we don't support ApplePay."

You say,

"Cancel the sale. I'll shop somewhere else."

If everyone does this, merchants will quickly get the picture and throng to get on-board.

I would say going to a business knowing that they don't accept Apple Pay, loading up a cart, going through the check out process and then proceeding to cancel the sale just to prove a point is quite douchey- not only to the clerk but also the poor saps waiting behind you. If that wasn't the suggestion, my apologies, but the wording kinda sounded like that behavior was being encouraged.
 
The reason why Rite Aid (and likely eventually all MerchantC/MCX companies) are doing this is blatantly obvious if you read the details of MCX...

$$$

MCX currently does not accept regular consumer credit cards. They currently accept only store credit cards, and most importantly, checking accounts.

It exists solely to cut the payment networks (Visa, MC, Amex, etc) out of the loop. They want them out of the loop so they no longer have to pay them a % of all charges.

If they can get everyone using MCX, they can save money by telling the major card networks to get bent.

This is not true .

"Broad payment options: No-one likes to have their choices limited. So we are building in the freedom to pay using a variety of financial accounts, including personal checking accounts, merchant gift cards and select credit and debit accounts."
 
Man Apple is messing up once again.

No, Apple didn't mess up a thing. RiteAid did. Bank of America did.

You should return your iPhone 6 and get an Android or whatever, cause Apple doesn't need a customer that **** talks about them over stuff that wasn't their issue. Next you'll be blaming them because Att decides to drop grandfathered unlimited data if you subsidize your iPhone purchase.
 
I think what I find most funny about this are some of the comments that claim they'll take their business to Walgreens.

Let's say, for example, a Walgreens is further from your location than Rite-Aid. Some people here would actually be willing to spend more money on gas just so they can use their phone to pay for purchases.
 
Because doing that is a dick move and you're creating more work for an underpaid worker who has absolutely no say in what payment methods the store accepts.

Underpaid? According to who?
 
#firstworldproblems

Oh here's a #tbt remember the time when it was so easy to take out the wallet and pay with a card?
So easy that you could do it with someone else's card.

I went to dinner at a very nice restaurant last spring with some friends. We had traveled to NYC to see some Broadway shows. After lunch we all put our cards on the table and split the ticket four ways (each of us paid about a hundred bucks--black truffles are expensive, you know). We each signed our ticket and put our cards back in our wallets.

Then we went to our shows. Three of us went to see Idina Menzel's musical IF/THEN. One went to see Les Miserables. After final bows of IF/THEN, two cast members came out to raise money for Broadway Cares/Equity Fights AIDS. They had an auction for a cue card with some lyrics to the song "Let It Go", that was signed by Ms. Mendel and the song's writers. The winner of the auction also got to go backstage and meet the stars of the show.

I thought it would be a cool souvenir of my trip, and it's a good cause. I participated in the auction, and I ended up being the winner. I went backstage with two of my friends, and we visited with Anthony Rapp and other cast members until Ms. Mendel was ready to go. We took some pictures, and a representative from Broadway Cares took the credit card and swiped it. Then I signed it. A few minutes later, we were back on the street (with my prize, an enormous autographed cue card), and went to meet our other friend at a cafe.

Our friend enjoyed hearing about us meeting the cast, and she asked whether I had received a receipt for the donation for my taxes. I said I had the credit card receipt, and they were going to send me an official receipt by mail. I pulled out my wallet to check the receipt was still there, and that's when I noticed that the name on the receipt was hers, not mine. I had just charged a $2000 donation to charity on my friend's credit card! We had similar cards, and we had mixed them up at lunch.

It took several days to get the charges moved to my credit card account.

So, yeah, I know how easy it is to pull a card out of your wallet and pay with it.
 
This is how stupid this is....
It is like taking visa but no amex or mastercard.....

Limiting payment choice for a customer is pure IDIOTIC !!!

Fools at riteaid... This is your customer trying to GIVE YOU MONEY ... Lol.. Why are u making it harder than need be ???f

I agree. I was just guessing that because others have said that this "CurrentC" is supported by ads.
 
Seriously?

People are that upset that they have to either swipe a credit card or use cash?

I guess maybe you could be mad in 5 years when no one is carrying credit cards and everyone uses NFC, but the technology (for Apple Pay) has been out for 4 days. This just seems insane to me.
 
pay is definitely introducing new selective pressure on my shopping choices. I cringe every time a story comes out where some merchant has had a data breach or skimming attack that resulted in my cc details leaking out. I'm covered from fraud by the banks, but it's one more thing to have to monitor. The one-time use cryptograms used in pay makes it my preferred payment choice now, and if a store can't/won't accept it, I'm going to prioritize them lower. I wouldn't go so far as to say I'll boycott anyone, but it will impact my decisions. I doubt I'm alone.
 
I realize that Rite Aid is probably under some kind of contract not to offer competing contactless payments, and that's why somebody at Rite Aid felt they had to turn off NFC or possibly face a lawsuit, but I still will not shop at Rite Aid until they fix this. They should realize that is not good PR to suddenly do something like that, especially without a press release informing everybody why they have to do that. Goodbye Rite Aid until they're back on board.
 
This is probably not an original thought and has been said elsewhere on this forum already.

But it seems to be that part of the problem with this rollout, is the short amount of time between announcement and deployment. Apple usually gives advance notice on big framework changes, for example giving developers a few months lead on new version of OS's so they can start creating apps in time for launch. Because of their need for secrecy with the launch of phones, the addition of NFC antennas on the iPhone 6's and therefore by extension Apple Pay was kept under wraps.

I just wonder if Apple had given a three to four month lead between announcement and deployment if some of this bugs would be worked out. Big Companies tend to move pretty slowly, so it's no surprise to me that Rite Aid didn't realise what was going on until people were actually using Apple Pay in their stores before they turned it off.

Its not a bug. It was probably action directed to Rite Aid by the consortium of retailers behind CurrentC. They had a meeting about Apple Pay threatening their lame attempt (not yet released) for mobile pay. So Rite Aid took unilateral action to defeat Apple Pay in order to show "support" for the consortium. This is not a bug and has nothing to do with Apple, Apple Pay or tokenization.
 
As is their right.

It is their right. I totally agree. But it is also the right of customers/potential customers to complain about their business decision. Don’t like that Rite Aid doesn’t accept Apple Pay or Google Wallet? Shop elsewhere until they accept it. I wholly approve of this. Rite Aid must face the consequences of their business decision. Nobody can or should be able to force them to accept either of these payment methods, including any government (through regulation). It’s Rite Aid’s choice not to accept it and it’s the customer’s choice not to shop there as a result.
 
People are that upset that they have to either swipe a credit card or use cash?

I guess maybe you could be mad in 5 years when no one is carrying credit cards and everyone uses NFC, but the technology (for Apple Pay) has been out for 4 days. This just seems insane to me.



I only use cash can not trust Apple and the Government they might be following me. :D
 
Load up a cart at the offending (non-ApplePay) merchant and go to checkout.

When they say,

"Oh, we don't support ApplePay."

You say,

"Cancel the sale. I'll shop somewhere else."

If everyone does this, merchants will quickly get the picture and throng to get on-board.

Please don't do this... iPhone users in general are already looked down on enough by society for being uppity and self-important. Doing this will just exacerbate it and make iPhone users look worse.
 
This is not true .

"Broad payment options: No-one likes to have their choices limited. So we are building in the freedom to pay using a variety of financial accounts, including personal checking accounts, merchant gift cards and select credit and debit accounts."

i.e. Store-branded credit cards.
 
Apparently, some stores turn that feature off. At least that has been that case for me.

So you tried to use it three times and two of those you got a 'not supported' message. Must have if you know they turned it off.

That isn't an Apple issue. That is the merchant being a jerk. And it's not something for Apple to 'work out'. They can force a company to take their system anymore than Discover could force folks to take their cards.
 
I don't know if this has been mentioned in the comments or not, but I read somewhere (don't know if it's true) that stores that signed on to use MCX can't accept competing mobile payments. This could be why because apparently they blocked Google wallet too, someone on her mentioned.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.