Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Please, everyone get over yourselves for saying, "Guess I won't be shopping there..."

If it's around the corner and you need to pick something up, you sure as hell will be shopping there in a few weeks.

Maybe you will. I won't nor will other people.
 
Why not support all payment systems

Why limit cutomers choice? If i want google pay i use that.. Apple then apple or C.... Whats the point of disabling a payment system.. Stupid!
 
Apple should have left this another year or so before release. They needed to be able to have robust relationships with banks and be able to offer it internationally for day 1. It's not good enough releasing something in one country, having it be sketchy for a year and then probably delay it further.
No, they should have released it years ago. Or somebody. NFC has been available for ages, but effectively, never used in the USA. I'm glad someone has stepped up to force at least some companies' hands in this manner. And it seems pretty secure, so Apple's version isn't bad.

Expecting perfection for every idiot that walks down the street from a brand new technology is silly. Your expectations are absurd. All of this is based on how people think. You want a robust relationship? Well, that is based on two companies getting executives together to talk, actual people. And people are jerks that don't get along very well.

The one argument that could work is that Japan and other countries have been using NFC for years, and theoretically US banks and companies (Apple, Google) could have done a better job copying them. But just imagine the internet angst over that!!
 
Isn't it only illegal for debt owed? A store can choose any kind of payment they want since its for a new purchase, not pay off some previous debt they are holding against you. Like if you owed $10 on a credit card and walked into their office to pay the $10 off, they would have to accept the U.S. currency to resolve that debt.

Even for paying off debt, there was a case where someone threw a bag with 2,000 pennies at someone whom he owed 20 dollars, and he got arrested for assault.
 
The country will be back to segregation in 10 years. This time, it will be Apple, Android, and everyone else, as the different ecosystems evolve and create alliances with different organizations.

This is why I wish this stuff was more like USB - there was some sort of comity (sp?) that would say that one kind of file protocol is standard for NFC, either you can follow it or not.

Imagine if when credit cards first came out they had this garbage where certain types of them only worked with IBM or Sanyo cash registers because of different tech. This whole thing where only certain devices work is silly and just makes it all confusing for consumers.

In the end you still have to have a credit card in your wallet and then whats the point of having it in your phone?
 
What's so silly about this, is that Rite Aid will eventually be forced to take Apple Pay due to market and consumer pressures. And if you take a step back and consider how asinine it is to prevent people from giving you money you were otherwise completely capable of accepting, this goes to a whole new level of business-first thinking instead of customer-first.

Fight it all you want Rite Aid. See you back here after you've done yourself needless PR damage.

To be clear- they will accept a person paying in pennies or personal check. But if you use Apple Pay, no way. Think about that.
 
Hmmm, what's that word I'm trying to come up with, oh yes, collusion. I think that was the same thing that got Apple into trouble. An NFC terminal is a brand-neutral POS, thus it shouldn't matter how the merchant wants to receive payment. That Rite Aid chose to refuse 'ApplePay' because a third company doesn't like it (is this true?) perhaps suggests a collusion amonsgts companies to control and prevent a service in favor of another that also uses the same NFC terminal. This should be interesting to watch how this will evolve. I hope what is happening is healthy competition.
 
There is a Rite Aid and a Walgreens (oh and a CVS) all on one corner near my house...guess which pharmacy is not getting my business...I actually plan to attempt to purchase something and when it is not accepted, give my "feedback" to the manager. Maybe if enough of us do that, Rite Aid will get the picture. Doesn't Rite Aid have the lowest market share of the three big national chains?

I've never heard of rite aid here in houston.
 
It's been said before, but it bears repeating:

Why on earth, in today's competitive retail climate, would a retailer do something to prevent customers from spending money with them?

Especially if the net goal is to promote another payment system... which, as I recall, is not the industry that Rite Aid is in. Or, did I miss that Rite Aid is giving up on selling convenience items at 100% markup and now secretly plotting to become a new financial payment processor?

I haven't used Apple Pay, yet (installed it on my 6 last night), but there are so many choices for Drug/Convenience Stores in my area that avoiding Rite Aid will be easy.
 
Apple should have left this another year or so before release. They needed to be able to have robust relationships with banks and be able to offer it internationally for day 1. It's not good enough releasing something in one country, having it be sketchy for a year and then probably delay it further.

I'm pretty sure iTunes Radio is still only available in the US, that was released 2 years ago.

They should've waited until people that won't do business with them will magically change their minds? So in other words, apple shouldn't have done apple pay at all right? That's like saying "wait until best buy and walmart get on board and THEN release apple pay right". How? Its not a matter of negotiation with everybody. Best Buy and Walmart Refused to participate at all in this.

I'm so glad apple doesn't think like you, or every road block would be a reason to just give up on everything
 
This is very fishy. MerchantC started right around the keynote that showed Apple Pay.

It is run by an LLC company behind the mask of a marketing / advertising firm.

It says it accepts most smartphones..

If they are purposefully cutting out Apple Pay and thusly the iPhone I fear Google is behind this.

In any case their App from Apple will be removed asap I believe leaving only the Google Play store and android based smartphones.
 
What the hell is merchant customer exchange? That's fine, I'll just get my drugs from Target instead.

I wondered the same thing. Target is also a merchant that works with merchant customer exchange, just for the record. They seem to have a pretty extensive list of partners to me.

http://www.mcx.com/

Even so, I have no confidence in this system. Where did it come from and why should I trust it?
 
I wonder what percentage of Rite Aid customers use Apple Pay? I have to admit, I am shocked by the number of people here who would stop shopping somewhere that they have shopped for years just because a merchant is somehow snubbing Apple, but this is MR, so it shouldn't be shocking.
 
Say that again... You have a card that is set up as your default card for Apple Pay, and when the card is used (apparently by a criminal far away, but probably also if you use it yourself without Apple Pay), it can pop up an alert on your phone? So you know at all times when your card is used?

Amex opted to share ALL transactions performed on the card with Apple Pay / your phone. So I presume that's what happened to him.

Some didn't - for instance my Cap One Venture only shows purchases I made using my phone.
 
Say that again... You have a card that is set up as your default card for Apple Pay, and when the card is used (apparently by a criminal far away, but probably also if you use it yourself without Apple Pay), it can pop up an alert on your phone? So you know at all times when your card is used?

It's been reported on here that some cards show only Apple Pay purchases in Passbook, while others show all purchases.
 
MercentC is not secure. They store your information in their cloud and it is geared toward advertising.

http://www.mcx.com/downloads/Merchant_Customer_Exchange_Unveils_Consumer_Brand_09032014.pdf

"A more secure way to pay. CurrentC will provide a more secure payment experience than traditional methods by storing users’ sensitive financial information in its cloud vault rather than locally on the mobile device. Furthermore, the application uses a token placeholder to facilitate transactions instead of constantly passing the data between the user, merchant and financial institution. These innovative approaches to security are only a sample of industry- leading tools used by CurrentC to create a comprehensive, layered approach to information security."

So unlike Apple Pay, they are storing users' sensitive financial information. And we have seen in the last weeks that sensitive financial information locked up in cloud vaults has a tendency to escape.
 
It works @ CVS? They are not on the launch list.

if so i'll be using it there (already have used it at walgreens and it works great)
With all the hacks going around no need for any of these companies to get my credit card #

absolutely no issues at all, and it does not ask for a pin whole transaction takes seconds.
 
Please, please, don't do this. Don't be that guy.

The cashier and the store clerks earn $15/hour, maybe. Please remember that.

The $300 you dropped on an iPhone 6 so you could save 5 seconds at the check stand does not entitle you to be a world-class prick.

Stop trying to make Apple Pay into a human rights issue.
Why not? What does it have to do with the cashier's paycheck? You think they are on commission? Ridiculous.

I've had stores turn me down for using a credit card because of a too-small purchase twice in my life, both times I said forget it and walked out. They don't want my money, I'll go away. Simple. Why should I have to shop somewhere when I don't like the policies? That makes me a "world-class prick". Do you even know what "world-class" implies? Utterly ridiculous. The blood has literally drained from my face because of the idiotic implications in your post.

Haven't even tried Apple Pay, yet. Haven't even tried setting up my CU bankcard, I doubt it works, yet. S'pose I could try.
 
By law it is illegal to turn down US currency at any US business. I think the US ought to pass a new law stating that if the business has an NFC terminal that they must accept all forms of NFC payment (Google Wallet, Apple Pay, etc.).

It depends on the form of the currency. For example there are many places that are "cash only" and don't accept cards at all. There are many places that accept cards but don't take American Express or Discover. There are places that don't take pre-paid gift cards. All of which is US currency that it's not illegal to deny.
 
Why not? What does it have to do with the cashier's paycheck? You think they are on commission? Ridiculous.

I've had stores turn me down for using a credit card because of a too-small purchase twice in my life, both times I said forget it and walked out. They don't want my money, I'll go away. Simple. Why should I have to shop somewhere when I don't like the policies? That makes me a "world-class prick". Do you even know what "world-class" implies? Utterly ridiculous. The blood has literally drained from my face because of the idiotic implications in your post.

Haven't even tried Apple Pay, yet. Haven't even tried setting up my CU bankcard, I doubt it works, yet. S'pose I could try.

And Apple users wonder why they are laughing stocks - look no further than this post.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.