Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

I really hope that a new apple tv box is released alongside the new apple television. Tv's have much longer service life than other electronics, a cheaper way to retrofit existing tv's would be great.
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Do you have weed in your mouth while using it?
 
Wirelessly posted (Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 5_0_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/534.46 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1 Mobile/9A405 Safari/7534.48.3)

Do you have weed in your mouth while using it?

i dont understand the question :confused:
 
If you are partnered with a cable provider, you don't need a specific internet connection. Set top boxes communicate back to the server without subscribing to full internet service. It's just part of the TV service.

arn

yeah and I don't see many cable providers wanting to work with apple on this here in the US. The cable providers wouldn't want something like iTunes on that tv if they work with apple and they would want to use there own PPV system that they have now. So unless apple plans to remove iTunes content from the tv then it would not work.
 
Sounding like it would be tied to a provider; kind of same model as cell phones. So, what do I do when I move and/or switch from let's say ATT-Uverse to say Time Warner?
 
Prefer the remote!

Thank you, but when I am on the couch I prefer to change channel with a remote (only one finger moves), rather than by saying it loud.

IMO, Siri or vocal contro is good for a phone because your hands are presumably busy, not to pilot a computer or as a remote.
 
Gestures and voice commands...

...practical on a TV?

I mean you sit at least ten feet away, so how is it done that a certain move, for example, to reach for a drink, doesn't at the same time change the channel?

Anyway, image and sound quality are key for a TV.

Not sure if I should care about the rest.
 
yeah and I don't see many cable providers wanting to work with apple on this here in the US. The cable providers wouldn't want something like iTunes on that tv if they work with apple and they would want to use there own PPV system that they have now. So unless apple plans to remove iTunes content from the tv then it would not work.

Sounding like it would be tied to a provider; kind of same model as cell phones. So, what do I do when I move and/or switch from let's say ATT-Uverse to say Time Warner?
Many (most?) new TVs today have WiFi or ethernet built-in and come per-installed with apps like Hulu, Amazon and Neflix. I don't see how Apple's TV set would be any different or require a specific provider. Mobile devices obviously need mobile connectivity but your TV should be fine staying on your WiFi or hardline internet connection.


Lethal
 
I can't wait to see people coming out of the Malls carrying a big apple tv. lol Are they going to carry it for you to your car? Good luck carrying that big thing in the mall.
 
How is being tied to an ISP any different than being tied to a cable provider, which Apple reportedly wants to free us from?

I'm calling BS on this one. Why would Apple have to pimp their TV to an ISP? What's next, subsidized TVs with a 5-year contact? NO FRIGGIN THANKS.
 
Many (most?) new TVs today have WiFi or ethernet built-in and come per-installed with apps like Hulu, Amazon and Neflix. I don't see how Apple's TV set would be any different or require a specific provider. Mobile devices obviously need mobile connectivity but your TV should be fine staying on your WiFi or hardline internet connection.


Lethal

Maybe they want to try to subsidize the TV because they probably know without doing that it would probably cost allot. You would probably have to sign a 2 year contract or more with your Cable provider the same way you do when you sign a contract for your Cell phone.
 
So why did recently apple call again The "APPLE TV" still a hobby but they want to come out with a expensive tv? hmm Doesn't make sense.
 
Rogers??

As a Canadian that uses (or suffers through) Rogers for my cable, wireless and phone service, I find it hilarious that someone thinks they are testing the apple tv in a rogers 'lab'.
You have to be kidding me.
I don't think they even read the instructions before they release a product or service. Everything rogers does is half done, and never correct.
And yet they have a lab?? LOLOLOLOLOL
 
Very interesting, although I find it hard to believe that Apple would let a real prototype into the labs of an unproven third party that they may not even partner with.
 
So... Kinect? Not bashing Apple here, but a lot of this already exists on the Xbox 360 with Kinect, so I'm interested if this is in any way more advanced, and, if so, how well it will appeal to people buying a new TV set.

I recall Apple having a lot of Kinect like patents already. I just hope is doesn't start yet another patent war with Microsoft.... because I'm so sick and tired of every new product someone makes causing law suits.
 
I don't see how Apple's TV set would be any different or require a specific provider.

Thinking it has to be different; otherwise, you are just talking a roku, ATV2..... No big deal, no need to tie to a provider. Thinking it is going to be bigger that that. Article mentions the following which tells me the content is the key.

He notes Apple is in a good position to “leverage” potential partnerships with carriers to gain access to a wide array of content. “We believe it is likely to be offered by AT&T (T-N29.970.020.07%) and Verizon (VZ-N38.140.300.79%) in the U.S. and Bell and Rogers in Canada,” he wrote in a research note on Monday.
 
I think this is BS and some analyst is just making this stuff up or some web site to just get traffic to their web site. Nobody even mentioned the TV until the book was released and now they are talking about it. It's all BS people.
 
I wonder if this is somehow two things mixed into one. Maybe they've got a prototype Apple TV for testing, but the hand gestures sound like that Samsung TV that was demoed recently. I think it was Samsung. But there was a TV controlled by gestures, and it looked terrible, uncomfortable, and incredibly awkward.

Maybe Apple's figured out how to make it work well though.
 
Very interesting, although I find it hard to believe that Apple would let a real prototype into the labs of an unproven third party that they may not even partner with.

Apple did this with the very first iPhone though. Mostly because it was such a groundbreaking device and unproven, and their demands on carriers were so insane for version 1, they kind of had to.

If the Apple TV set is going to require participation of service providers in some way, I can see them having to do that as well this time around. That's more of concern to me than anything. That you might need certain services or providers, and that doesn't sound quite like Apple... it's not a mobile phone.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.