We need to know which regions this applies to before we know if it will have a large impact. I would have thought they would wait until at least 12 before dropping Rosetta 2 or have it as an optional download.
Sounds like Intel's lawyers found something usable in the proverbial attic...
So untrue. It is very easy to recompile for Apple silicon via Xcode as is proven by the large number of programs already done so. So perhaps we should wait to see what the real issue is. Patent, copyright, local law. Who knows until we do knowIt they disable Rosetta then the whole Apple Silicon transition is dead in the water. No one will trust the platform to not vanish out from under them. Just knowing this codepath exists is horrifying.
funny, i think macedonia, nope Memphis, Egypt!Maybe it’s just Egypt because they don’t approve the naming of it.
That’s unknown currently. The author would have been guessing.It would help if the article told us in which regions this is actually happening right now.
Intel invests enormous resources to advance its dynamic x86 ISA, and therefore Intel must protect these investments with a strong patent portfolio and other intellectual property rights. The following graph shows that relentless instruction set innovation translates into a deep and dynamic patent portfolio with over 1,600 patents worldwide relating to instruction set implementations.
However, there have been reports that some companies may try to emulate Intel’s proprietary x86 ISA without Intel’s authorization. Emulation is not a new technology, and Transmeta was notably the last company to claim to have produced a compatible x86 processor using emulation (“code morphing”) techniques. Intel enforced patents relating to SIMD instruction set enhancements against Transmeta’s x86 implementation even though it used emulation. In any event, Transmeta was not commercially successful, and it exited the microprocessor business 10 years ago.
This sounds like the least likely conspiracy theory so far on this issueRosetta is a necessity for ensuring a smooth transition and to allow users the freedom to use apps as needed. (Especially power users that work in tech, arts, academics, etc)
Maybe this has to do with a maintenance issue; they don’t want to support this forever? Honestly, I’d pay an extra $3 a month for the privilege of continued Rosetta support!
You hear that Apple? Another subscription to make stubborn customers using Rosetta only apps (which will continue for at least 3 years, I imagine, if not forever) to have continued support, for payment. Power users, educators, and enterprises would pay; regular users wouldn’t be bothered because they will only use M chip approved apps. Problem solved!
aint that our century so far?Love all the breathless frothing going on here based on incomplete information as to how/why Rosetta disappeared in some regions and if it's a software glitch or intentional.
Ummm, noBait and switch. Apple should do the right thing and accept refunds going back to launch day from these regions.
If you don’t live in North Korea, Iran, or certain other countries where the U.S. has strict export controls, my guess is you’re fine.It they disable Rosetta then the whole Apple Silicon transition is dead in the water. No one will trust the platform to not vanish out from under them. Just knowing this codepath exists is horrifying.
Apple Silicon Simulator.Copyright based off the name "Rosetta" or the technology behind it?
Just rename it something simple like the Apple Silicon Translator.
Honestly, I’d pay an extra $3 a month for the privilege of continued Rosetta support!
aint that our century so far?
This is the most likely explanation. For anyone who's submitted iOS apps, there's an odd question about whether your app uses "encryption," including HTTPS. If yes, it's subject to whatever export laws. No idea why Rosetta 2 would be affected in particular if macOS isn't, but these are weird laws with a long history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_StatesNope. Then it would be the U.S., and it won’t be the U.S.
More likely it has to do with export controls - something about Rosetta is technology that can’t be exported to certain “hostile” countries. That’s my bet, anyway.