Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Copyright based off the name "Rosetta" or the technology behind it?
Just rename it something simple like the Apple Silicon Translator.
 
It they disable Rosetta then the whole Apple Silicon transition is dead in the water. No one will trust the platform to not vanish out from under them. Just knowing this codepath exists is horrifying.
So untrue. It is very easy to recompile for Apple silicon via Xcode as is proven by the large number of programs already done so. So perhaps we should wait to see what the real issue is. Patent, copyright, local law. Who knows until we do know
 
Meanwhile, back in 2017:

Intel invests enormous resources to advance its dynamic x86 ISA, and therefore Intel must protect these investments with a strong patent portfolio and other intellectual property rights. The following graph shows that relentless instruction set innovation translates into a deep and dynamic patent portfolio with over 1,600 patents worldwide relating to instruction set implementations.


Also, remember what happened to Transmeta:

However, there have been reports that some companies may try to emulate Intel’s proprietary x86 ISA without Intel’s authorization. Emulation is not a new technology, and Transmeta was notably the last company to claim to have produced a compatible x86 processor using emulation (“code morphing”) techniques. Intel enforced patents relating to SIMD instruction set enhancements against Transmeta’s x86 implementation even though it used emulation. In any event, Transmeta was not commercially successful, and it exited the microprocessor business 10 years ago.
 
Rosetta is a necessity for ensuring a smooth transition and to allow users the freedom to use apps as needed. (Especially power users that work in tech, arts, academics, etc)

Maybe this has to do with a maintenance issue; they don’t want to support this forever? Honestly, I’d pay an extra $3 a month for the privilege of continued Rosetta support!

You hear that Apple? Another subscription to make stubborn customers using Rosetta only apps (which will continue for at least 3 years, I imagine, if not forever) to have continued support, for payment. Power users, educators, and enterprises would pay; regular users wouldn’t be bothered because they will only use M chip approved apps. Problem solved!
This sounds like the least likely conspiracy theory so far on this issue
 
It they disable Rosetta then the whole Apple Silicon transition is dead in the water. No one will trust the platform to not vanish out from under them. Just knowing this codepath exists is horrifying.
If you don’t live in North Korea, Iran, or certain other countries where the U.S. has strict export controls, my guess is you’re fine.
 
Not good Apple.

...I just had to Bork my Intel iMac in early December...😢 I really liked the M1 MBP initially, but software compatibility issues and meh battery life have made it disappointing. If Rosetta 2 is axed sooner rather than later that will be problematic for me.

Bummer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Moyapilot
Nope. Then it would be the U.S., and it won’t be the U.S.

More likely it has to do with export controls - something about Rosetta is technology that can’t be exported to certain “hostile” countries. That’s my bet, anyway.
This is the most likely explanation. For anyone who's submitted iOS apps, there's an odd question about whether your app uses "encryption," including HTTPS. If yes, it's subject to whatever export laws. No idea why Rosetta 2 would be affected in particular if macOS isn't, but these are weird laws with a long history. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Export_of_cryptography_from_the_United_States
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.