Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Enough of the "thinness wars;" can we just get a phone with a flat back again please?

I wish. But if this 18,000mAh 3/4" thick phone has a protruding camera, I don't think there's any hope left.

energizer_unit_vsavov17.jpg
 
Enough of the "thinness wars;" can we just get a phone with a flat back again please?

In 2024 there will be an iPhone with the upcoming I3DTD (Infinite 3D Triplodepth) camera. This needs a bump just as big as the phone itself. The Apple design team will then find a way to make it flush again. Until then: patience...
Downside: V2 of I3DTD (also in development) will need one of the lenses being 3mm deeper than the other ones.
 
Yo dawg, we heard you like cameras, so we put 4 cameras on your iphone so you can take 4 photos at the same time while using the camera.

So the consumer, when looking to upgrade, is faced with a larger price tag, and a phone that’s a little faster with more cameras? Do these phone companies really believe that the majority of consumers are going to trade in or drop their current device for a more expensive phone with just a better camera? Pretty sure the results are in on this one. The smartphone market is saturated and the tech has peaked.

A large improvement in photo/video quality and useability is basically the only reason for me to upgrade, any recent smartphone is fast enough for me, but add a wide-angle lens and better low light photos/video and I’ll temped to upgrade.
 
The report also suggests the triple camera system could only be offered on higher storage capacity models. If Apple can’t offer the new camera system on a £1099 64GB Max variant then quite frankly I’m done with Apple. Price gouging at it’s finest. 64GB has been more than sufficient as I’m heavily invested in iCloud/Apple Music and I’m sure many others feel the same
I feel the same. I’ll wait till September. If it doesn’t convince me I quit Apple ecosystem.
 
I think, it would be a good and needed decision to keep up with Huawei regarding the camera.
The Mate 20 Pro's camera is so much better, but you have to use it belief it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5105973
I think they will milk the multi camera trend until they have 4 cameras. Because if you have 4 cameras that are identical that add up to 1, you can still have wide angle and 2x zoom. But that’ll be saved for iPhone 12 .
 
Good luck to those with strong trypophobia, although these aren't irregular.
[doublepost=1552659435][/doublepost]
Kind of sets off my Trypophobia

It doesn't for me because it's not shaped irregularly. However coral, sponges, and beehives don't either, yet they're irregular. Weird. Everyone is different.
 
All of the reviewers keep saying that the Pixel 2 and Pixel 3 from Google take the best photos. Both are single camera equipped but the special sauce is in the image processing.

To me just adding more and more cameras to the phone is a brute force approach to try and create better photos when the smarter way is with engineering effort on the image processor and associated software.

But I'm just going by the reviews, I own neither an iPhone X/XS or a Pixel.

No, it's not. Adding lenses is not to improve the "quality" of photos that can be taken with a single lens. Indeed, Apple's multi-lens phones still use only a single lens in most situations. Rather, adding multiple lenses adds a feature: being able to use a longer focal length, for example, when required by the situation. No matter how good image processing is, it can't substitute for a different focal length in situations where a different focal length is appropriate.

Of course, Apple can and should find a way to implement this feature without ruining the aesthetics of iPhone.
 
I actually am pretty OK with these new renders.

The report also suggests the triple camera system could only be offered on higher storage capacity models. If Apple can’t offer the new camera system on a £1099 64GB Max variant then quite frankly I’m done with Apple. Price gouging at it’s finest. 64GB has been more than sufficient as I’m heavily invested in iCloud/Apple Music and I’m sure many others feel the same

I don't feel the same. 64gb wasn't enough for me when it was the top tier option. I've got the 512gb now and frankly... I'd opt for a 1tb if it were available. And yes, I use iCloud, but I store my music locally. There's no sense in burning through your battery if you don't have to.

I actually kinda wish they'd do what Samsung did with the S10 phones and do a horizontal arrangement centered in the middle. Tired of my iPhones always wobbling when I use them on flat services!

Dear god no. Samedung's new 'visor' is hideous. If your phone wobbles, maybe you ought to get a case.
 
No
The report also suggests the triple camera system could only be offered on higher storage capacity models. If Apple can’t offer the new camera system on a £1099 64GB Max variant then quite frankly I’m done with Apple. Price gouging at it’s finest. 64GB has been more than sufficient as I’m heavily invested in iCloud/Apple Music and I’m sure many others feel the same
For sure
not me, I travel a lot and cloud services are a real problem
 
  • Like
Reactions: jezbd1997
Wow, I'm not quite sure why there's such an obsession w/ cameras on phones? I guess I missed the boat over the last few years...? Give me a dependable phone w/ good battery, wifi, signal, and solid OS and I'm happy. Seems like we're buying cameras w/ phone features instead of a phone w/ some camera features.

I guess I'm old... :p
 
  • Like
Reactions: bevsb2 and 5105973
The cancer growth on the back of the phone keeps increasing. Frickin fugly.

Worst of all this could actually be true ... another good reason to keep my 6s with it's tiny camera lens & bump for as long as it lasts.
 
No, it's not. Adding lenses is not to improve the "quality" of photos that can be taken with a single lens. Indeed, Apple's multi-lens phones still use only a single lens in most situations. Rather, adding multiple lenses adds a feature: being able to use a longer focal length, for example, when required by the situation. No matter how good image processing is, it can't substitute for a different focal length in situations where a different focal length is appropriate.

Of course, Apple can and should find a way to implement this feature without ruining the aesthetics of iPhone.

The reviews I've seen of the Pixel 2/3 are claiming it does the bokeh effect better than Apple does with two cameras though. And it has better low light performance.

I would say that having one camera with an adjustable aperture would be more useful. For low light scenarios etc - Also I've read rumours that one of the cameras may be monochrome thus used in conjunction with the other camera that does colour to give better photographs. If they end up doing that and the pictures still look worse than the Pixel 2 from years ago by the point this phone releases that would be embarrassing.

In-fact it's embarrassing that the Pixel 2 still beats the iPhone XS in photos. I don't want to downplay the importance in photography of having different focal lengths. But lets be real, most people 90% are just using the standard focal length and not really using the wider or telephoto capability present on some phones. They need to get the core usage better than the competition before experimenting with expensive additions like more and more cameras in my opinion.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.