Isn't 1.8 Inches Pretty Thick??
Isn't 1.8 Inches Pretty Thick??
it would be pretty thick. fortunately, we've got two other dimensions that 1.8" could be.![]()
I think Apple would be stupid to go down the track of putting a 160gb drive in an ipod. I would prefer to see more functionality like there is in the iriver products (built in radio tuner for starters) and longer battery life. Apple have gotten away with ipod hype for a long time now and i think the wave is starting to break.
Personally I find ipods boring now and can't wait to sell mine and get an iphone.
in fact, three.
Isn't 1.8 Inches Pretty Thick??
Next Gen AVC-Intra 3CCD HD Video Camcorders need this ASAP.
id kinda drop to your feet if you had that, and the fact that your computer would be powerful enuf to handle the bandwidth..It would also be nice if those camcorders did 1080p60 too (and by that I mean 1920x1080P @ 60 fps).
omg no way, the next gen nano will have 16GB of nand flash... all i want is the feel of a full sized ipod without the feeling if i once drop this, the harddrive could be toast. im also remembering some rumors awhile back of apple going all flash in the near future.... please dont rain on my parade
i don't care about capacity (very few people have 160GB of iPod-playable media, and i doubt any of those people will want to have it all available to them all the time). I just want the drives to become more durable. In my experience, the HDD is usually the second component to die (very shortly after the battery). I think get the iPods up to 120GB, but make the drives more stable.
I think Apple would be stupid to go down the track of putting a 160gb drive in an ipod. I would prefer to see more functionality like there is in the iriver products (built in radio tuner for starters) and longer battery life. Apple have gotten away with ipod hype for a long time now and i think the wave is starting to break.
Personally I find ipods boring now and can't wait to sell mine and get an iphone.
Hmmm...not really. When the first-gen 5GB iPod came out I already owned a 20GB Creative Nomad Jukebox and had 11GB of music on it. It was almost exactly the same size and shape as a portable CD player (how uninventive), with a klunky but usable interface, which sync'ed (s..l..o..w..l..y over USB) to Soundjam and early versions of iTunes. It had a laptop hard drive inside, which accounted for the size and weight!Apple really needs to update, there was a time when the iPod music player was a leader in storage space with a whopping 5 gigs of space. That left all other mp3 players in the dust (especially with battery life!), and it's about time Apple reclaimed the throne.
Sorry to burst your bubble guys, but hard drives are old school and Apple knows it. The failure rates are higher, they limit the device size, and they use too much power.
With the amount of flash that Apple is picking up, one can only conclude that there will be no more hdds in future iPods. Don't forget the flash based laptops that they are working on.
If you do the math, I think the next gen high-end nano will sport 16G flash and the next gen video will sport 16G and 32G of flash.
I stinks that the users used to the 60/80G configurations will have to take a hit to keep up with technology.
In any case, I think 160 GB would only be nice for a small sub-set of the market: those that have insanely large collections, probably illegally acquired, ...