Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I doubt life with the Samsung is so much better than the iPhone. Battery still stinks on both. But whatever anyone does to create a battery war is most welcomed....if that can create some invention in the battery department.

Apple has innovated on a lot of things on the iPhone but battery has been completely forgotten. If you look back, getting the first iPhone it was a shocker, to go from the old dumb phones with a week of battery, but it was worth it because of the great new experience of using an iPhone. Now, many have forgotten, I guess, but going back to an iPhone 3GS for example would probably triple the battery life compared to the 5s. Apple has always bragged about the battery in their presentations, but in the latest releases they just found ways of hiding bad battery life in silly "facts". Like I thought for the last years, if apple made a new phone without any innovation except a 3x or 4x battery increase I'd buy it in a heartbeat.
 
::beautiful music plays, serene Austrian rugged scenery::

Apple: what would your verse be?


Samedung appears with a smug face:

:: screech music stop, busy airport misery in view::

'You are an ignorant iPhone user wall huger'

Really?
 
Clearly you guys have never take the iPhone into a subway. A few stops underground can drain my battery life by 30% and I'm just playing candy crush.
 
Funny how Samsung chooses the right words and images to maximize the emotional impact and that is "comparison", while MR is engaging in hyperbole when doing the same. It seems to me that MR is using the word "bashing" to "compare" a comparison ad to the actual ad. As you say, it does not matter if it's true or not.

I'd say both are hyperbole. It's irrelevant that one is an ad and the other is misunderstood as news. Whether hyperbole is actually hyperbole is not dependent upon who is using it. You could argue that one is generally accepted while the other is not - but hyperbole is hyperbole.

Funny how MR claims to be a "news" site, but comes off as a fanzine. I don't expect advertising to be neutral, and I also don't expect editorials to be framed as news. So there's your difference.
 
Hope Battery Improves in the 6

My number 1 gripe about the iPhone/iPad is that the minute I activate the camera, the phone pretty much dies within 60 - 90 minutes - even if I'm not taking photos and just have it in "standby" mode.
 
Seems in their bid to copy everything Apple, Samsung is now copying their Lemmings advertisement.

Are they trying to make their own customers feel smug and self righteous, or merely alienate the iPhone users they are hoping to convert?
 
"In power saving mode, users only have access to basic phone functions, such as making and receiving calls, accessing email, and browsing the web. It limits cellular connectivity to 3G, turning off LTE, and it also disables WiFi and Bluetooth. According to Samsung, this provides an additional 24 hours of standby time with less than 10 percent of battery left."

So it becomes an old flip type phone in battery saving mode? No longer a smart phone?
 
They choose to put the USERS down instead of the device. That's the problem.

At their own peril, of course. The tone of the ad is quite smug, but then so are a lot of Apple's ads. The problem I have is MR editorializing instead just reporting. I don't need to be told what I should think.
 
All Samsung is able to say here is "hey look, we let you change batteries". Sorry, I don't want to carry around another battery. Their power saving mode is terrible as all it does is underclock the CPU/GPU to make the phone as choppy as can be (or is that just Touchwiz?).

The fact is, Samsung is in the same boat as everyone else. Battery life isn't great on phones unless you never turn the screen on.

Most Samsung phones use amoled screens. They use no power to display blacks. The new samsung s5's ultra power saving mode makes the screen black and white (no colors). Can you see now how it works?
 
This as does tap into something but not the truth. iPhone was the first single, big smartphone platform so everyone has seen people sitting by outlets with iPhones. Thing is, if any Samsung or other competitors models were nearly as big we would see the same thing with them. Just illustrates how being the market leader means you take the good with the bad.

Very good point. Can't remember being in a room and seeing maybe more than a few Samsung phones in the bunch. More than you saw 2-3 years ago, but still not close overall.

Most Samsung phones use amoled screens. They use no power to display blacks. The new samsung s5's ultra power saving mode makes the screen black and white (no colors). Can you see now how it works?

Cool, I've been looking for a $600 phone that can make my screen look like it did on my Nokia 5190. If only power saving mode also included Snake.
 
I'm not saying its good or bad, right or wrong. Attacking the consumer is not smart.

The goal of an ad is to attract attention and it's certainly done that. Whether you agree or disagree doesn't matter as much as there will be a percentage that do.

I don't really see how this ad is actually attacking Apple users at all. It's just showing that they have to resort to plugging their phone in constantly.
 
Just a fact check

c9gZ1RG.png
 
"In power saving mode, users only have access to basic phone functions, such as making and receiving calls, accessing email, and browsing the web. It limits cellular connectivity to 3G, turning off LTE, and it also disables WiFi and Bluetooth. According to Samsung, this provides an additional 24 hours of standby time with less than 10 percent of battery left."

So it becomes an old flip type phone in battery saving mode? No longer a smart phone?

How useful is the phone when the battery is dead? Disabling power-hungry features when the battery is near to die is pretty smart imo
 
Well, it’s true. I was at the airport last week, tethered to the wall even though the batter was 87% full, afraid id have to manually go on power saving mode by rationing the use of gaming or limiting usage to just music listening 3 hours in to my upcoming flight. I do hate I cant just pop in a new fully charged battery but, Apple is already working on that and Samsung is sure to copy – faster than they did, the finger print thing. In cell display integration with solar charging on the iphone 8s

Ahh, external battery pack? Mine can charge my phone 4-6 full times.
 
Good observation. If I were one of Samsung's ad exec, I would fire the idiot who green light this ad. The last thing I would want is to alienate potential customers by insulting them. iPhone users are potential future customers. All bets are off now.:rolleyes:

This "wall hugger" (an ancient Galaxy S 4G) will pass on any Galaxy machines now. This ad pushes me more and more towards the Nexus.

I love me a Nexus phone but battery life is not the top feature. But for $350 I could live with it.
 
Samsung Bashes iPhone Battery Life, Calls Users 'Wall Huggers' in New Galaxy ...

Haha. Love the ad!

--------------

Sad part is, the iPhone battery life isn't that bad. Who needs promotion when Samsung does Apple's promotion for them? :p


How's this ad a (positive) promo for Apple's iPhone?
 
The one most used maybe?

I know for a fact that the iPhone battery life is not bad considering the size of the device and the demand we place on it.

All this advertisement tells me is, iPhones are used more than any other device, and almost *constantly*, and so commonly need to be charged 'on the fly'. The 'wall huggers' are common because there are so damned many iPhones in the wild (well over 50% of the US smartphone population is comprised of iPhones), most of those heavily used.

It simply says Samsung has to stick with "battery swapping" to make the grade. I remember those days. Keeping a spare battery charged and carried with me all the time, and I'm happy to NEVER return to those days. I visit cafes all the time. I recharge there if/when possible and needed... no big deal!

It makes me wonder... in the not too distant future, when the Tesla Electric Car goes mainstream (they're on the verge of releasing a couple of 'consumer priced' family models), and people have to pull into a Supercharging Station from time to time to take a break and recharge their car, will Samsung also 'poo poo' these 'wall huggers', while promoting their better 'internal combustion' alternative?

Because seriously. Battery life will ALWAYS be an issue (until we have a fundamental breakthrough in the technology). Until then, we're barely keeping up.

Well, actually, Apple is doing a great job with battery tech. My MBA lasts 12 hours, my Retina iPad Mini well over ten, and my iPhone usually gets through the day without any recharging (probably because I use the other two instead of the phone for many tasks, but such is the trade off for 'all day telephony').

Someday we'll have 24-hour batteries in our phones. Apple doesn't have that now, nor does Samsung... Again, the only reason you see so many iPhone 'wall huggers' is because there are so many iPhones, most being used to death all day.

Samsung can only dream of having so many wall huggers! :p
 
Except for the end where they alienate potential customers by calling them names.:rolleyes: It would have been 100x better if they had replaced, "Don't be a wall hugger" with "Free yourself from the wall." It's the same message except one is mildly offensive, the other isn't.

I have two words for you; chicken fat.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.