What I love most about Samsung commercials is Apple enthusiasts reaction to them.
Why, because women in a spa are too stupid to know what having "a better picture because it has more pixels" means ???
On the contrary, both my 35 year old daughter and 11 year old daughter do know about both pixels and retina. (Lord knows I hear my youngest constantly asking for a retina iPad!)
The ad didn't show a technical debate. It was a simple "your screen looks better because it has more pixels", which anyone can understand. Even the women you seem to think don't have brains to discuss it even at that high level.
Remember the Mac vs PC ads? Same thing.
not quite the same thing, (a) they were made in much better taste, and they were usually much funnier, (b) they were aimed at the actual computers, not the end users, whereas all such Samsung ads are trying to put down anyone that is not using their devices, (c) they were mainly trying to show that a Mac can actually do the things a PC can do, and more, as 99% of people at the time would not buy a Mac because of the things they thought it could not do, and (d) the Mac vs. PC adds did not mention any company by name (PC refers to Microsoft Windows computers, but still is not a company name)
so no, not quite the same thing
Funny you mention this. My Samsung fridge is the biggest pile of POS fridge I've ever owned - requiring at least two repairs per year over the last eight years. It is one of the primary reasons I won't buy a Samsung phone, tablet or any other device. Honestly terrible product. Never again.
That's a lot of Samsung products. I own zero Samsung products unless their components are used in them and I don't really have any control over that. There are a lot of alternatives to Samsung in those electronic and appliance segments that are just as good if not better.
Why give Samsung your hard earned money so they can bully everyone else with misleading marketing? With that said, you can buy whatever you want, but Samsung is an ugly corporation that will do whatever it takes to be #1 and push everyone else out.
not quite the same thing, (a) they were made in much better taste, and they were usually much funnier, (b) they were aimed at the actual computers, not the end users, whereas all such Samsung ads are trying to put down anyone that is not using their devices, (c) they were mainly trying to show that a Mac can actually do the things a PC can do, and more, as 99% of people at the time would not buy a Mac because of the things they thought it could not do, and (d) the Mac vs. PC adds did not mention any company by name (PC refers to Microsoft Windows computers, but still is not a company name)
so no, not quite the same thing
a) seems like you never ever watched one of those ads.
b) windows vista was a product that was heavily mentioned. and when you have around 5% of the market you really dont care where you get those extra % from.
c) why focus on a particular pc maker when they all shared a common denominator which was windows os which was made fun of in the ads.
d) the ads rather showed the advantages of macs over windows pc ie lack of virues, how easy it was making home videos etc
e) what non samsung users were put down in this particular ad and how exactly?
I haven't seen MS shove full screen apps down anyones throat.
Talk about being delusional... The quote below illustrates this quite well.
btw, to anyone reading this, I'm not putting down Samsung's product, I have had Apple, Samsung, LG and Nokia devices, and I can say I have been almost equally satisfied by all of them.
and I'm not really trying to defend a corporation against another, I'm only talking about the ads, I really do think the Mac vs. PC ads were made in much better taste than these ones
So wait, Surface having an optional dock, mouse and keyboard is now bad somehow?
I guess if you guys like Samsung too much, or if you enjoy this kind of bashing ads, you will never see any truth in the points I made, no matter what I say.
I have watched all of the Mac vs. PC ads. Windows Vista was not 'heavily mentioned' (I guess it depends on how you understand the word 'heavily').
I'm not interested in discussing market shares (I think you just wanted a little extra something to put in your points, but this is not really a contest between me and you guys, I was just expressing an opinion).
Also, your fourth point should be something that I should be using (e.g. "Apple's ads were also pointing out some really important advantages - how difficult it is to get viruses, how much more stable their system was, how much easier to use, etc - as opposed to just stressing some unimportant features like 'true multitasking', having slightly more pixels, a slightly larger screen, etc.").
And as for your last point, I really don't know how you can say that you don't see how some Samsung ads put non-Samsung users down. But I'll buy that you really have not thought about this and offer you a few examples:
- ads which show Apple fan boys waiting in line like idiots
- ads which try to show that people that buy Apple products are actually clueless old men and old ladies
- the Samsung Watch ad which shows the non-Samsung Watch guy like a really clumsy, uncool guy
- this ad that we are commenting under, which tries to show that Samsung users are cooler, quicker to respond, and generally smarter (please don't tell me you don't see it)
of course, this is not to say that all Samsung ads are bashful (some of them just show their products), but too many of them are
btw, to anyone reading this, I'm not putting down Samsung's product, I have had Apple, Samsung, LG and Nokia devices, and I can say I have been almost equally satisfied by all of them.
and I'm not really trying to defend a corporation against another, I'm only talking about the ads, I really do think the Mac vs. PC ads were made in much better taste than these ones
what is metro/modern but shoving full screen apps down users throats? Yes--there is usable multipaning in 8.1--but the destop--the home of real mutitasking--is labled ad "legacy". MS may have it backward--as the desktop will probrably long out last their mobile initative--assuming they havent fatally undermined the franchise. Certainly osx has emphasized full screen apps in the last 3-4 years. Whenever I watch some on a Mac "screen tear" between applications to cut and paste I want to throw up. Its so visually fatigueing
I guess if you guys like Samsung too much, or if you enjoy this kind of bashing ads, you will never see any truth in the points I made, no matter what I say.
I have watched all of the Mac vs. PC ads. Windows Vista was not 'heavily mentioned' (I guess it depends on how you understand the word 'heavily').
I'm not interested in discussing market shares (I think you just wanted a little extra something to put in your points, but this is not really a contest between me and you guys, I was just expressing an opinion).
Also, your fourth point should be something that I should be using (e.g. "Apple's ads were also pointing out some really important advantages - how difficult it is to get viruses, how much more stable their system was, how much easier to use, etc - as opposed to just stressing some unimportant features like 'true multitasking', having slightly more pixels, a slightly larger screen, etc.").
And as for your last point, I really don't know how you can say that you don't see how some Samsung ads put non-Samsung users down. But I'll buy that you really have not thought about this and offer you a few examples:
- ads which show Apple fan boys waiting in line like idiots
- ads which try to show that people that buy Apple products are actually clueless old men and old ladies
- the Samsung Watch ad which shows the non-Samsung Watch guy like a really clumsy, uncool guy
- this ad that we are commenting under, which tries to show that Samsung users are cooler, quicker to respond, and generally smarter (please don't tell me you don't see it)
of course, this is not to say that all Samsung ads are bashful (some of them just show their products), but too many of them are
btw, to anyone reading this, I'm not putting down Samsung's product, I have had Apple, Samsung, LG and Nokia devices, and I can say I have been almost equally satisfied by all of them.
and I'm not really trying to defend a corporation against another, I'm only talking about the ads, I really do think the Mac vs. PC ads were made in much better taste than these ones
One point only...
Please explain then why PC was a business man but Mac was dressed as a cool hipster.
Are you really suggesting they weren't making fun of the end user and/or positioning their users as cool vs PC users?
Just to clarify this statement I wanted to add a bit to it:
Please explain then why PC was a chubby, doddering, older, unhip business man but Mac was dressed as a cool, young, slim, smart hipster.
It's kind of odd that something so obvious is being denied by a few people.
I guess if you guys like Samsung too much, or if you enjoy this kind of bashing ads, you will never see any truth in the points I made, no matter what I say.
I have watched all of the Mac vs. PC ads. Windows Vista was not 'heavily mentioned' (I guess it depends on how you understand the word 'heavily').
I'm not interested in discussing market shares (I think you just wanted a little extra something to put in your points, but this is not really a contest between me and you guys, I was just expressing an opinion).
Also, your fourth point should be something that I should be using (e.g. "Apple's ads were also pointing out some really important advantages - how difficult it is to get viruses, how much more stable their system was, how much easier to use, etc - as opposed to just stressing some unimportant features like 'true multitasking', having slightly more pixels, a slightly larger screen, etc.").
And as for your last point, I really don't know how you can say that you don't see how some Samsung ads put non-Samsung users down. But I'll buy that you really have not thought about this and offer you a few examples:
- ads which show Apple fan boys waiting in line like idiots
- ads which try to show that people that buy Apple products are actually clueless old men and old ladies
- the Samsung Watch ad which shows the non-Samsung Watch guy like a really clumsy, uncool guy
- this ad that we are commenting under, which tries to show that Samsung users are cooler, quicker to respond, and generally smarter (please don't tell me you don't see it)
of course, this is not to say that all Samsung ads are bashful (some of them just show their products), but too many of them are
btw, to anyone reading this, I'm not putting down Samsung's product, I have had Apple, Samsung, LG and Nokia devices, and I can say I have been almost equally satisfied by all of them.
and I'm not really trying to defend a corporation against another, I'm only talking about the ads, I really do think the Mac vs. PC ads were made in much better taste than these ones
“These seem kind of mean." - AdWeek, 15 May 2006
"My problem with these ads begins with the casting. "
...
"The final straw, for me, is that the spots make unconvincing claims."
- "Apple's mean-spirited ad campaign" -Slate magazine ad report card, 2006
"Insightful commentators have noticed the negative aspects of Apple’s comparative campaign"
...
"Since some humans see computers as extensions of themselves, PC users are predictably prickly about the campaign. The actor Justin Long reported: “I had a guy come up to me, in my face, saying, 'You think you're so cool? You're not cool' and I'm saying to him, 'Dude, it's a commercial.'"
- "Analysis of the Get A Mac campaign" -Working Psychology
IMHO, if you cannot laugh about both sets of ads, then you need to take a deep look at where your personal identity comes from.
- the Samsung Watch ad which shows the non-Samsung Watch guy like a really clumsy, uncool guy
I really do think the Mac vs. PC ads were made in much better taste than these ones